LGR4GM Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidc3000 Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Why? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cityo'Rasmii Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 They improve on a different roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashsabre Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Because he said he was going back to Sweden. Most likely because he felt he want getting a shot with the Sabres. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msw2112 Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 I don't see how this helps the Sabres, but maybe there was a backlog of players in Rochester and Cederqvist wasn't getting any playing time, so they did the guy a favor. Obviously (or at least I'd like to think) the Sabres didn't see him in their future plans. I'm not sure what the "future considerations" would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthEbriate Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 It's bringing balance to The Concept Of. You get Robinson for future considerations, you pass the considerations on to someone else. Also, don't forget this move saves money on the remaining half season of his contract. I reserve the right to laugh when Cederqvist becomes a revelatory bottom 6 grinder and is traded for a 4th at the deadline as this year's Scandella Experience. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shoot da Puck Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 This is huge 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Haha 24 minutes ago, Weave said: Why? We want guys who want to be here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Finally! The shake-up they most desperately needed! PREPARE THE BANNER 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 27 minutes ago, Weave said: Why? I’m almost certain this is a nothing move but for the love of the hockey gods, can the Sabres stop ridding themselves of every player in the org that has size and grit. Borgen Delauries Carrier McNabb Montour Hagel Lyubushkin Foligno Fasching Cederqvist 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabresVet Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 34 minutes ago, pi2000 said: Finally! The shake-up they most desperately needed! PREPARE THE BANNER And it only took losing to the Kraken at home to do it. Now, if they lose to Ottawa tonight does Cale Klague get moved for future considerations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 54 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: It's bringing balance to The Concept Of. You get Robinson for future considerations, you pass the considerations on to someone else. Also, don't forget this move saves money on the remaining half season of his contract. I reserve the right to laugh when Cederqvist becomes a revelatory bottom 6 grinder and is traded for a 4th at the deadline as this year's Scandella Experience. Take a penny, leave a penny. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashsabre Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 36 minutes ago, inkman said: I’m almost certain this is a nothing move but for the love of the hockey gods, can the Sabres stop ridding themselves of every player in the org that has size and grit. Borgen Delauries Carrier McNabb Montour Hagel Lyubushkin Foligno Fasching Cederqvist They definitely have a type they like and don’t like and if the past 13 years have shown anything it should be that they need to keep more of these “compete” guys around. And you can add Kane and Bogosian to the list too😃 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contempt Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Weave said: Why? Because we demoted Jost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 3 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Because we demoted Jost Offhand comment? If not, explain. We have plenty of contract space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 1 hour ago, Weave said: Offhand comment? If not, explain. We have plenty of contract space. Yes an off handed comment, but he was buried on the prospect depth chart playing in only 19 of the Amerks 31 games. He was never making the Sabres. He needed a fresh start elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SABRES 0311 Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 2 hours ago, SabresVet said: And it only took losing to the Kraken at home to do it. Now, if they lose to Ottawa tonight does Cale Klague get moved for future considerations? Are we at that point? I mean it would be a blockbuster deal for KA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 6 hours ago, DarthEbriate said: It's bringing balance to The Concept Of. You get Robinson for future considerations, you pass the considerations on to someone else. Also, don't forget this move saves money on the remaining half season of his contract. I reserve the right to laugh when Cederqvist becomes a revelatory bottom 6 grinder and is traded for a 4th at the deadline as this year's Scandella Experience. Robinson was traded for a CONDITIONAL 7TH ROUND PICK, thank you very much. 4 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Because we demoted Jost 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalonill Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 Does that mean he's going to become a star like ever X buffalo player 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Lee Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 I’m not close to bent out of shape over this. But it does perhaps speak to the issue of having too many bodies within a certain age-range. Without trading an established forward, there is little room for our high-end prospects in Buffalo. And the sheer # of prospects that we have, means there is insufficient oxygen for the b and c level players to grow and develop. This not only means that few will make it to Buffalo but also that they will have diminished to no value. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 This is clearing out of a player that wasn’t getting a shot. Yes, he was bigger than the average forward, but at 23 is he standing out in his two years in Rochester? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhenWillItEnd66 Posted January 12 Report Share Posted January 12 I am not going to say that i know every prospect we have and how good they are. I do know that we have way more prospects with abilities to play in the NHL then we will have room on the roster for. Not to mention that almost all of them seem to be from the same mold. Skilled offensive players with little or no forechecking ability/defensive ability, and grit. Sabres have a long history of getting rid of players that a "Heavier" game. Our current roster although "Slightly" heavier, still needs a bit more. Time for KA to move some capital for a "Heavy" power forward, and a "Heavy" defensive dman. That is 100% what this team needs. If they got both of those, the difference would be huge in the team playing ability. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.