PromoTheRobot Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, ... said: ERod, that was not good. You must take the puck in and do something with it. Erod looks overwhelmed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, bunomatic said: This whole idea of bringing in players because Jack went to school with them or is buddies is a bad way to build a team. Vessey, Erod. Hows has that worked out ? I think they earned a look based on they way they played in college. Both are boarderline NHL players but giving them a shot is not a problem. Remember just three years ago our farm system was in shambles. Edited November 9, 2019 by Pimlach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said: Smart players like Kucherov don't trip players because it's usually called Being annoyed at inconsistent officiating is not the same thing as blaming woes on the refs, just so we're all on the same page here. Just watched it again. Lucky it wasn't embellishment on Girgensons. As for Montour, also watched it again. I'd now call it a swipe and not a punch, but it was also the third time in the sequence that Montour roughed Johnson, so I'd guess that one was a matter of the ref saying, "OK, that's enough." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radar Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Just now, Randall Flagg said: That was probably the best period they've played in several weeks. Well played but Tampa just seems to have the speed edge on us. I figured Tampa was due to come around to it's game unfortunately it gets it together against us. Talented team and we're holding our own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said: Erod looks overwhelmed. There was a brief period last year when he looked like a decent 3rd liner. Not anymore. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 I'm still seeing Jack not engaging with his body, I need more from him in that department. Not a bad period, of course they wait until I cross the border to play well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 They are playing better. I like Johansson with Mitts. Sheary and Vesey seem to be rotating with that line and Skinns line. Erod still not up to snuff. Send him down call up either TT on wing or maybe Asplund to play center on the third line? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Cool segment of Leenus and Brian on the town! Food looked good 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveoath Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 (edited) Erod is out his depth. Vesey has actually surprised me. His defensive play is pretty decent. Needs a break in front of goal. Edit, I was wrong about Vesey Edited November 9, 2019 by steveoath 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Cool coverage of Stockholm, the town, the shops, the food. When do we get to see the Sweedish bikini team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHAAAUGHT!!! Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, Radar said: Actually Vessey I don't think has been bad just not scoring. Well, from what I've seen so far this season he's at his best when he's a warm body out there not making mistakes. I wouldn't call that good either... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Pimlach said: Cool coverage of Stockholm, the town, the shops, the food. When do we get to see the Sweedish bikini team? Mmmm. I wonder if the carpet is the same as the drapes ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tondas Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, Pimlach said: Cool coverage of Stockholm, the town, the shops, the food. When do we get to see the Sweedish bikini team? And here I thought IKEA provided the best racks in Sweden. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: Just watched it again. Lucky it wasn't embellishment on Girgensons. As for Montour, also watched it again. I'd now call it a swipe and not a punch, but it was also the third time in the sequence that Montour roughed Johnson, so I'd guess that one was a matter of the ref saying, "OK, that's enough." If this sequence ever deserves a penalty, it always deserves a penalty, and the result would be that the game would be 100% special teams. It is bush league to call things sometimes and not others for this reason. Otherwise you arbitrarily change the course of the game for no reason. I'm glad you at least agree it wasn't a punch How the actual ***** did we not score there. Edited November 9, 2019 by Randall Flagg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 You guys gonna bitch about that call too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 That's a weak interference call 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Come on guys, it’s Curtis ***** mcilhenny. Bury it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Randall Flagg said: If this sequence ever deserves a penalty, it always deserves a penalty, and the result would be that the game would be 100% special teams. I'm glad you at least agree it wasn't a punch Three times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SABRES 0311 Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Sabres drank some Jolt Cola. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Total BS that we are behind this game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torpedo Forecheck Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, PASabreFan said: You guys gonna bitch about that call too? Yeah it was a ***** call Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, PASabreFan said: You guys gonna bitch about that call too? No, because we're not caricatures, as much as this post indicates you'd like to think. We're capable of observing calls with nuance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skaught Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 Just now, PASabreFan said: You guys gonna bitch about that call too? Sure. That was incidental, shouldn't have been a penalty. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, darksabre said: That's a weak interference call I guess I don’t know the rule. I don’t understand the call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, PASabreFan said: Three times. Ah, I forgot section 3.1 - 07: Two face washes are acceptable, but three deemed an infraction. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.