darksabre Posted April 26, 2017 Report Share Posted April 26, 2017 Dave Davis RT'd something to the effect that this is essentially a done deal. Excellent. Will be interesting to see if he works out for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted April 27, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Friedman on NHL Network confirmed he will be signing here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 I'm glad we are honoring our commitments, but I wonder about a new GM's feeling about such a signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 I'm glad we are honoring our commitments, but I wonder about a new GM's feeling about such a signing. Why? New Gm's take over teams all the time with players who were just or recently signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Friedman on NHL Network confirmed he will be signing here Awesome. Glad this didn't fall through with the GM change. We need major turnover on our Defense core. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 (edited) I'm glad we are honoring our commitments, but I wonder about a new GM's feeling about such a signing. You're only allowed 50 signed players. Have a hard time believing that a GM would be upset about having a mid-20's NHL (in all likelihood) caliber D-man added as one of those 50. Even if the new guy "hates Russians," & if it turns out that he's only a 6 that would in a worst case be a tradable asset, unlike say a Chad Rhuwedel. Much better to have Antipin in the fold. Edited April 27, 2017 by Taro T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 You're only allowed 50 signed players. Have a hard time believing that a GM would be upset about having a mid-20's NHL (in all likelihood) caliber D-man added as one of those 50. Even if the new guy "hates Russians," & if it turns out that he's only a 6 that would in a worst case be a tradable asset, unlike say a Chad Rhuwedel. Much better to have Antipin in the fold. And on top of that, it's a depth chart that is very thin on the blue line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 And on top of that, it's a depth chart that is very thin on the blue line Yes, moar defenze pls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 If we get lucky and Antipin turns into a solid NHL-er, there may be a situation where the new GM conceivably needs only 1 major D acquisition this summer, a top 4 RHD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader1969 Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 If Taylor Hall is only getting you Larrson are we sure Samson would even fetch a legit top 4 dman at this time? To get Seth Jones the Hurricanes had trade a #1 centre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 (edited) Johansen was picked fourth overall Went back to junior and scored 92 points in 63 games. Added 21 points in 67 games as a rookie And then followed that with 12 points in in 40 games in the lockout year. Reinhart was picked second overall Went back to junior and scored 105 points in 60 games. Added 42 points in 69 games as a rookie And then followed that with 47 points in in 79 games as a sophomore. One could argue Reinhart is on a path to be better than Johansen Unless of course #Hammymath Edited April 27, 2017 by dudacek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted April 27, 2017 Report Share Posted April 27, 2017 Johansen was picked fourth overall Went back to junior and scored 92 points in 63 games. Added 21 points in 67 games as a rookie And then followed that with 12 points in in 40 games in the lockout year. Reinhart was picked second overall Went back to junior and scored 105 points in 60 games. Added 42 points in 69 games as a rookie And then followed that with 47 points in in 79 games as a sophomore. One could argue Reinhart is on a path to be better than Johansen Unless of course #Hammymath Very good points. I really don't want to see Sam go. But I also really don't want to watch that defence again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 Johansen was picked fourth overall Went back to junior and scored 92 points in 63 games. Added 21 points in 67 games as a rookie And then followed that with 12 points in in 40 games in the lockout year. and then was traded for a top defenseman :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) and then was traded for a top defenseman :P Exactly. The post was in response to Crusader wondering if Sam could return a top defenceman. Edited April 28, 2017 by dudacek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to let the next GM trade Kane for that D. For some reason, I have this gut feeling that Sam is going to blossom fully next season in a 65-70 pts guy. Reinhart kind of reminds me of Derek Roy, but more talented. Roy had 46 pts at 22 years old and then blossomed into a 60 pt player at 23 and an 81 player @ 24. Reinhart had 47 as a 21 year last season. Is it really unreasonable to think that he might similarly improve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to let the next GM trade Kane for that D. For some reason, I have this gut feeling that Sam is going to blossom fully next season in a 65-70 pts guy. Reinhart kind of reminds me of Derek Roy, but more talented. Roy had 46 pts at 22 years old and then blossomed into a 60 pt player at 23 and an 81 player @ 24. Reinhart had 47 as a 21 year last season. Is it really unreasonable to think that he might similarly improve? So friggin excited that the next coach will understand how to utilize the players on this team. That plus a couple additions and subtractions and I'm starting to feel pumped for the new season. Sam could break out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) I'm convinced Kane's gone at Pegulas order: not the kind of person he wants on his team. If so, he should be leverage for that D man. If NHL history is any indication, the third season is usually where talented forwards make a jump. I have very high expectations for Sam next year. Edited April 28, 2017 by dudacek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm convinced Kane's gone at Pegulas order: not the kind of person he wants on his team. If so, he should be leverage for that D man. If NHL history is any indication, the third season is usually where talented forwards make a jump. I have very high expectations for Sam next year. You are probably right that Kane is a goner. I'm ok with that. I almost came around to being a Kane supporter, but trading him now at max value makes the most sense. Vatanen? Almost a wash in cap $, (short-term). If we get a Vatanen, after signing Antipin plus Guhle, I might even be inclined to use our top pick on big winger (Vesalainen?) (and then get 2 D in the 2nd rd). The average age of our top 6 D at that point would be 24 at the start of next season (Bogo 27, Vatanen 26, Antipin 24, Guhle 20, Risto 23 and McCabe 24). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matter2003 Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) Interested? Sure. I'm just a little taken back by the unanimous opinion that we can just plug him into next year's lineup. Why can't we? Toronto did with a very similar player and he produced pretty well. The KHL is not the AHL, there are quite a few really good players there. Antipin played for team Russia in the World's, he definitely isn't some scrub. Edited April 28, 2017 by matter2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to predict that Kane is not a goner (assuming he stays out of trouble this summer). I think TP will not micromanage his new GM on something like this -- and that the new GM is going to want to keep Kane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to predict that Kane is not a goner (assuming he stays out of trouble this summer). I think TP will not micromanage his new GM on something like this -- and that the new GM is going to want to keep Kane. I hope this is right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to predict that Kane is not a goner (assuming he stays out of trouble this summer). I think TP will not micromanage his new GM on something like this -- and that the new GM is going to want to keep Kane. Didn't you see a lot of the subtext coming out of the year-enders - character, structure, standards, commitment - directed at Kane? I mean Kane's last two interviews were basically focused on him justifying - apropos of very little - how he is different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to predict that Kane is not a goner (assuming he stays out of trouble this summer). I think TP will not micromanage his new GM on something like this -- and that the new GM is going to want to keep Kane. I agree. I've been seeing the whole "Kane is a goner" thing flying around and I think it's bunk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 Didn't you see a lot of the subtext coming out of the year-enders - character, structure, standards, commitment - directed at Kane? I mean Kane's last two interviews were basically focused on him justifying - apropos of very little - how he is different. Well, i didn't watch those interviews with Kane. But my takeaway from TP's stressing of "character, communication, etc" was that it related more to failings in how the organization was run off the ice than to individual players. I.e. it seemed to me that TP came away from the exit interviews with players and staff with the impression that GMTM ran a disorganized snake pit of an organization, and that this inevitably had deleterious effects on the on-ice product. Also, my understanding is that Kane generally practices hard and doesn't present a team discipline problem. If I'm wrong about that, then I think your prediction becomes more likely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 28, 2017 Report Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm going to predict that Kane is not a goner (assuming he stays out of trouble this summer). I think TP will not micromanage his new GM on something like this -- and that the new GM is going to want to keep Kane. As long as we lock him up to an extension this summer, then. Can't risk losing him for nothing, or dumping him for near nothing at the deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.