Jump to content

Let's Trade for Dougie Hamilton


WildCard

Recommended Posts

Nylander, Reinhart and Ristolainen for Hamilton and Gaudreau.  

Value is off here. The difference between Risto and Hamilton is very similar to the difference between Gaudreau and Reinhart, and then there's a Nylander on our side for no reason. 

 

You'd need to add that Tkachuk kid and then a small piece on our side, probably. And that's just to get the value equal, I definitely want no part of this deal even though I looooooooooooooooove Johnny hockey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only because of injuries, ill luck, & Muckler's stubbornness. Even w/ ALL that working against them they still took the eventual SC champs to OT 3 times and lost all 4 games 4-3. :censored:

 

Yup.  Injuries to the two most dynamic players in the league at the worst time possible kept that trade from being the next step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is not enough, so be it. He has another 5 years at 5.75. He won't be a top pairing here.

 

Frankly, I think our best chance to get a potential top 4 guy is at the deadline. Anaheim is going to need cheap scoring help at the deadline and is bursting to the seams with D and top D prospects. They also have cap issues, and expansion issues. We an help.

We trade them Kane, eat 1/2 of Kane's deal this season for Theodore and Bieksa. We can afford the extra year on Bieksa's deal because we get rid of Kane's salary, plus Franson comes off the books. I'd even do the deal for Montour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is not enough, so be it. He has another 5 years at 5.75. He won't be a top pairing here.

 

Frankly, I think our best chance to get a potential top 4 guy is at the deadline. Anaheim is going to need cheap scoring help at the deadline and is bursting to the seams with D and top D prospects. They also have cap issues, and expansion issues. We an help.

We trade them Kane, eat 1/2 of Kane's deal this season for Theodore and Bieksa. We can afford the extra year on Bieksa's deal because we get rid of Kane's salary, plus Franson comes off the books. I'd even do the deal for Montour.

 

I want no part of Bieksa, but I do like Montour and Theodore.   I'd even go Kane for Montour and a pick.   

 

That said, Kane's been playing well but how long can he stay out of trouble and healthy.

Edited by pi2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want no part of Bieksa, but I do like Montour and Theodore.   I'd even go Kane for Montour and a pick.   

 

That said, Kane's been playing well but how long can he stay out of trouble and healthy.

They can't afford to take Kane off our hands without giving us a contract back and that is the reason for Bieksa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...