thewookie1

Frankly, the lottery is what makes 1sts so much more valuable. When the Top 12 can give you #1, it inflates the value immensely versus 1sts from 13 on

La La La La John Jason Peterka has a shift His puck can be my puck too Whenever we skate out, our opponents always shout, there goes John Jason Peterka on a shift La La La La la

The best candidates for success would likely be Bennett or Karlsson. Stephenson would likely want Mitts money thus ending that option. I’d assume a good deal; once the lottery is over I’d be open to moving it.

That team hurts me constantly; they run counter to everything I love about hockey and its structures. Ironically my Armchair GM also ended up with issues for Quinn and Peterka only I used money on Matt Roy.

The trade for Karlsson is something I mostly like, I just feel it shouldn't require our Top C prospect to get since Vegas is going to have to move someone due to their absurd cap situation. (Plus I just really don't want to give Vegas another dynamic center) As for Toffoli, I do really like his experience and continued competence on the ice; however, even if I may want to push more for the present I really don't want to end up in a situation with Quinn, Peterka and Levi having great seasons but losing 1 because we need to retain a 33 year old winger. If Peterka or Quinn flame out it wouldn't be a problem but in the best case scenario I don't want all of our happiness to get stabbed viciously by losing a young star.

A random set of moves https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5038481

Expected Buffalo had Toffoli at 2x7mil which is where my concern came from. At 2x3.5 you can make it work with some maneuvering. With 2x7mil you have no real options besides losing 1 or hoping you can bridge all 3 at reasonable rates

What makes it funny @Thorny ?

He talked with double digits, truly interviewed 3/4 A good way to fight off a question regarding who he talked to as no one will pursue the read people until late in the offseason.

Toffoli is 2x3.5mil here right otherwise I can't imagine us doing this as it would effectively doom any hope of resigning Levi, Quinn and Peterka.

We lost due to injuries on our defense finally sinking us; had McKee came back for Finals we'd have been better than Carolina in theory. That being said we'd of lost if we had to field 3 AHL depth defenseman for the whole Finals.

Frankly this seems nothing short of petty by Friedman. Its far too absolute to be true and I highly doubt Adams was outright lying when he said he spoke with double digits of candidates. Its far more believable to say Adams is stretching the truth or using a technicality than it is for him to blatantly lie to the press and fans while doing little to nothing for the past week. Plus we know for a fact Friedman holds a grudge against Adams and the Sabres due to our rather tight lipped front office and the whole Eichel situation in which Friedman carried Eichel's agents viewpoint at every turn.

I don't think we would of had an issue with Edmonton that year no matter how tough they were; that Sabres team weren't wallflowers and could certainly punch back while having two incredibly clutch centers in Drury and Briere. Now injuries are something we can't exactly allude to know how they would go down but if McKee could come back for the Finals; we'd of been in a slightly better position than Carolina had been.

I don't think I make that trade for Karlsson, perhaps with Östlund or Wahlberg I do but not with Savoie. After all, Vegas has to gain cap space. Otherwise I'm ok with both moves. I doubt we buyout Skinner this offseason; its far more tolerable of numbers next year.

Something tells me even that is not set in stone.