ubkev Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Ugh, we protected Ennis and Girgensons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyK Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Except for Ennis over Carrier it seems good! (IMO) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) First reaction is that Carrier will be on his way out. Only reason I can think we didn't protect him over Ennis is that we worked something out with LV. Paul Hamilton is stealing my ideas: Paul Hamilton Verified account @pham1717 1m1 minute agoMore Ennis and Carrier makes no sense to me unless Botterill has a deal in place with that says Vegas lays off Ullmark if they can have Carrier. Get out of my brain, Hamilton!! Edited June 18, 2017 by Robviously Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 I liked Carrier, surprised to see him unprotected over Larsson/Foligno. Was right about Ennis tho :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyK Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Will Ennis be better in the new fast paced system? (no where to go but up) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Unpopular opinion incoming: I think I'd rather lose Ullmark than Carrier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 McNabb not protected in LA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radar Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Carrier over Ennis the only mild surprise. A healthy Ennis I can understand. Carrier just doesn't have the offense Ennis has but I still would have picked him and exposed Ennis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Does JB see Ennis as a Sheary/Geuntzel type? Sigh, I like Carrier better at this point in their careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Does JB see Ennis as a Sheary/Geuntzel type? Sigh, I like Carrier better at this point in their careers. Ennis right now is the ultimate fool's gold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Surprised to see Carrier left open over Ennis, however, I'm inclined to think Jbotz has a deal in place with Vegas to take Molson so I'm not too worried. Perhaps that move comes down to locker room politicshope its Moulson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radar Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Unpopular opinion incoming: I think I'd rather lose Ullmark than Carrier. You're right! I definitely don't agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Ennis right now is the ultimate fool's gold.no guarantee he returns to form Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustache of God Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Confirmed: Jbotz loves Enzo sauce, wants the good times and good taste to continue rolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Ennis, is shocking. What a scrub. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthEbriate Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) The "Translate from Danish" thing is the only reason I'm posting this. #HammySpeak? Does JB see Ennis as a Sheary/Geuntzel type? Sigh, I like Carrier better at this point in their careers. I see Carrier as the relentless Sheary type (plus some physicality if less scoring). I thought for sure we'd keep him protected. I really have to believe there's something in place for a Moulson/Bogosian contract offload. Ennis as the reclamation project? (JBot does come from Pittsburgh-land; Crosby has spoiled him in return to form post-concussions). Edited June 18, 2017 by DarthEbriate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 Unpopular opinion incoming: I think I'd rather lose Ullmark than Carrier. I would much rather lose Carrier than MODO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 I would much rather lose Carrier than MODO. Bah, Ullmark may have brought MODO here, but he's one of us now regardless! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyK Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 The Oilers protected Kassian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 no guarantee he returns to form I think it's far likelier that he doesn't than he does. But he's the type that GMs always talk themselves into as a reclamation project, only to have said project never get off the proverbial ground. I'll be annoyed if I have to watch him sabotage our top-6 again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ct fab Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 About what I thought. When housley talked up Ennis, figured they'd protect him. Remember Ennis and girgs were really good before being stifled by dckhead Dan. I liked carrier's size and speed but he has shown he can be even a semi decent scorer in the NHL. The one reason I think that LV won't take moulsen in a side deal is moulsen and his family really love buffalo and mcphee wouldn't have any to uproot them. My guess of a deal is, "if you don't want us to take ullmark, then expose carrier." Ideally they'd take BOGO or moulsen but I don't see that happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 So are all the lists out? What do we think Vegas looks like if we're working purely from a BPA perspective? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) Fleury Mrazek Niemi Campbell Miller Luongo Lehtonen Grubauer If I'm Vegas, I want Fleury, Mrazek, Campbell, I think. Edited June 18, 2017 by Eleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom webster Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 So are all the lists out? What do we think Vegas looks like if we're working purely from a BPA perspective? Unless they know they can flip them, they have to fill out a roster first. They are targeting three years from now but they have to have 7 defenseman, 13 forwards and 2 goalies this year. Fleury Mrazek Niemi Campbell Miller Luongo Lehtonen Grubauer If I'm Vegas, I want Fleury, Mrazek, Campbell, I think. McPhee drafted Grubauer so he may have a leaning toward that although he also knows if he isn't what he thought so.....,I guess I have no idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 No real surprises here. Carrier is a 3/4 line guy. More upside in an Ennis, if he can stay healthy. I think we lose Bogo or Moulson. Maybe swing a deal for one of the D men available to them. Were probably going to eat the last year of Gorges contract, can't see Vegas taking him. But, all in all nothing to be concerned over. In any event, Vegas has a decent amount of ammo to select from. Should be fun seeing what they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.