dudacek Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 The team looks mostly set Is this the forum consensus going into this year? (Not my take, but my take on your takes) Eichel: ready to put up first line numbers O'Reilly: more of the same Okposo: good first line winger Reinhart: should stay at wing, improve numbers Kane: douche and trade bait, but not for pennies on the dollar Ennis: could surprise, but don't count on him, an accident waiting happen Girgensons: he'll score more, but may not be a top six guy Gionta: OK 3rd liner, good fourth Foligno: see Gionta Larsson: see Foligno Moulson: done Deslauriers: good guy for his role COR: hope he's in the minors Ristolainen: first pair, ready to emerge as a legit #1 Kulikov: upgrade on Gorges, not good enough to play on the first pair Bogosian: overpaid, adequate 2nd pair guy Gorges: can't wait until he's on the third pair McCabe: raw, but has a good future Franson: don't want him around Nelson: please beat out Franson Lehner: big question mark Nilsson: terrified that he might have to start Ullmark: OK with him in Rochester, but really want him to become our number one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 The goaltending situation makes me worried we might be in the running for number one overall next year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 Nailed it, though I'd add detail to Eichel. I want 70-75 points from him. I'd call 60 points "first line production" and I expect a bigger jump than that. I'm hoping that Foligno-Larsson-Gionta can continue to be more than the sum of their parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 The goaltending situation makes me worried we might be in the running for number one overall next year WHAT ?? I just spit out coffee reading this one.. You think we might be drafting #1 overall cause of our goaltending situation... That's a knee slapper... Tis team is better than that even if we didn't play a goalie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 WHAT ?? I just spit out coffee reading this one.. You think we might be drafting #1 overall cause of our goaltending situation... That's a knee slapper... Tis team is better than that even if we didn't play a goalie That's a bold strategy, Cotton. We'll see if it pays off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 The goaltending situation makes me worried we might be in the running for number one overall next yearWe won't even be close to top 5 barring catastrophic injury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 We should be bubble team.... Stay healthy and we make it in..... Major injury (eichel, Samson, risto) and we could be top 10 in draft picks.... This is predicated on the rooks and newbies not stepping in well (bailey, Nylander, Fasching) could all possibly come in and surprise a little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 I agree that these generally reflect the consensus around here, although I might add a few tweaks: Kulikov -- expected to be Risto's partner (and thus top-pairing); this feels like it's above his natural station. Regret in some quarters about giving up on Pysyk. Lehner -- yes, a question mark, but most love the fire and are looking forward to seeing him play a full season without starting off hampered by injury. That's all I've got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 A couple of my personal disagreements: I consider Larsson an excellent third liner. And I expect Girgensons will be a complimentary top 6 winger. Good enough to hold his spot, but not at all the driving force of the line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 Pretty good list overall, but my differences would be: Not writing Kane off completely I think Larsson, Gionta, and even Foligno are pretty good 3rd line guys, and as a 4th line would be great, not good In my estimation, Kulikov can manage a first pairing placement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 I just want to watch hockey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsb Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 I sometimes think the consensus opinion has an issue with selective memory. Item #1 Defense hasn't improved over last season Fact...... The 6 Dmen to start the year was Risto-Gorges-Franson-Pysyk-Weber and Colaiacovo, plus believe it or not the oh so awesome Pysyk was getting the least amount of TOI, if I'm not mistaken...... Yes Bogosian was injured Projected Dmen to start next season.... Risto-Kulikov-Bogosian-McCabe-Gorges-Franson/Nelson A gigantic improvement in my opinion in skill-speed and the young guys have some experience to boot,a Major Upgrade Item #2 Kane can't play with Eichel Fact..... when these 2 were paired together to start the year, Eichel was a peached fuzz rookie and Kane was coming off an injury, when paired later in the year with Samson, this line clicked big time and Kane came to their defense often enough to protect them, personal opinion is the Jack-Samson line needs a little physicality as their 3rd linemate and if it isn't Kane, it won't be Ennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtDart Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 I agree that these generally reflect the consensus around here, although I might add a few tweaks: Kulikov -- expected to be Risto's partner (and thus top-pairing); this feels like it's above his natural station. Regret in some quarters about giving up on Pysyk. Lehner -- yes, a question mark, but most love the fire and are looking forward to seeing him play a full season without starting off hampered by injury. That's all I've got. If Lehner can play a full season, he is easily a top 5 goaltender. I hope he does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 If Lehner can play a full season, he is easily a top 5 goaltender. I hope he does.In the NHL?? Easily?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 If Lehner can play a full season, he is easily a top 5 goaltender. I hope he does. In the NHL?? Easily?? Yeah, that might be a little strong, DirtDart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted August 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 When we acquired Lehner, I was excited. In my mind, he, Gibson, Allen and Vasilevsky were the best goalie prospects in the league. His play last year did nothing to change my mind. But I understand now that the majority of the board did not consider him a prospect, just a guy who had failed to grab the number one spot in Ottawa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 When we acquired Lehner, I was excited. In my mind, he, Gibson, Allen and Vasilevsky were the best goalie prospects in the league. His play last year did nothing to change my mind. But I understand now that the majority of the board did not consider him a prospect, just a guy who had failed to grab the number one spot in Ottawa. I feel like I have turned around on Lehner. I hated the trade but after seeing him play I think he has the potential and skill to be the #1. I think his concussion was the reason he got the high ankle sprain, he simply wasn't in good enough shape. I will give him another season before I worry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 My biggest complaint,if you will, with your list is saying Moulson is done. He isn't done. He may be done as a top 6 player, but with the right center (Larsson?) with decent passing skills, i think he can be a very effective 3rd line LW and 2nd line PP player. If we got 15 goals and 20 assists from a 3rd line winger, I think we'd all consider that a success. I'm also not real worried about the goaltending. Lehner was very effective with a 80% ankle last season when he played. The ankle is now 100%. This bodes very well for the season. If he does get injured again, Ullmark, not Nilsson is the answer and Ullmark played well in Buffalo last year. I'm not worried about Ullmark's Roch numbers as he was playing behind a horrible D group. My biggest concern is a potential D pairing of Gorges and Franson and like you I'm praying Nelson makes the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Moulson is done, and won't sniff 15 goals or 35 points ever again, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 My biggest complaint,if you will, with your list is saying Moulson is done. He isn't done. He may be done as a top 6 player, but with the right center (Larsson?) with decent passing skills, i think he can be a very effective 3rd line LW and 2nd line PP player. If we got 15 goals and 20 assists from a 3rd line winger, I think we'd all consider that a success. I'm also not real worried about the goaltending. Lehner was very effective with a 80% ankle last season when he played. The ankle is now 100%. This bodes very well for the season. If he does get injured again, Ullmark, not Nilsson is the answer and Ullmark played well in Buffalo last year. I'm not worried about Ullmark's Roch numbers as he was playing behind a horrible D group. My biggest concern is a potential D pairing of Gorges and Franson and like you I'm praying Nelson makes the team. What did Moulson show you last year to make you think he's not done? Bylsma's usage and Murray's comments point to them thinking he's done. And if he's not a top-6 scorer, then he's finished. He doesn't play a lick of defense or bring anything to the table you'd want out of somebody farther down the lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonHextallsShoulderPads Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Calling it now: Moulson makes a case for himself this year as a solid 2nd/3rd line contributor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Calling it now: Moulson makes a case for himself this year as a solid 2nd/3rd line contributor. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted August 25, 2016 Report Share Posted August 25, 2016 Unless Moulson finds the correct combo of undetectable steroids, he is not resurrecting from the basement. Or the fountain of youth.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 Unless Moulson finds the correct combo of undetectable steroids, he is not resurrecting from the basement. Or the fountain of youth.... I don't think that's very hard to find Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 I have 3 things: I think Larsson will have a career year, looking to break the bank in free agency next year. I think Gorges will play 3rd line minutes and mentor Nelson this year. I think the best place for Girgensons is 4th line center, 1st PK, and can slide up as needed for injury or whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.