That Aud Smell Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 So much for sticks and stones can break my bones but words will never hurt me. Seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 I saw Shaw mouth that in real time last night, I wonder how often that word is used on the ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 I didn't catch the play, but Laughton was carried off on a stretcher. Really hope he's alright, sounds like it was an ugly collision with the boards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted April 20, 2016 Report Share Posted April 20, 2016 I didn't catch the play, but Laughton was carried off on a stretcher. Really hope he's alright, sounds like it was an ugly collision with the boards. It was pretty awkward. Hit the back of his head pretty hard. I would guess concussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Shaw gets a one game suspension for using a homophobic slur.so feelings > health. Got it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 (edited) Huberdeau just left the ice real gingerly after scoring a collision goal with Griess God this league just sucks so much Edited April 21, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 I don't hate that no goal call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 If you don't crash into the goalie skate-first your goal might be allowed and you won't get hurt. Huberdeau waited way too long to try to stop with a defender all over him. What did he think was going to happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 I've seen that goal called a dozen times Yay, more challenges! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 I don't understand what they're looking at. They already decided it was no goal. Are coaches allowed to challenge everything now? I'm pretty sure the refs just humored Florida by letting them waste their challenge on something they couldn't even challenge. Wtf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 And another review. At this pace I'll see the next pitch by 11pm. Oh wait, we're supposed to be watching a fast, flowing sport? Huh, my mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Wouldn't it be nice if the ref would communicate clearly with the fans? What. The. . Does. The. Bolded. Mean? (viii) The video review process shall be permitted to assist the Referees indetermining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure theyare “good hockey goals”). For example (but not limited to), pucks thatenter the net by going through the net meshing, pucks that enter thenet from underneath the net frame, pucks that hit the spectatornetting prior to being directed immediately into the goal, pucks thatenter the net undetected by the Referee, etc. This would also includesituations whereby the Referee stops play or is in the process ofstopping the play because he has lost sight of the puck and it issubsequently determined by video review that the puck crosses (orhas crossed) the goal line and enters the net as the culmination of acontinuous play where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e.,the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net atthe end of a continuous play). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 (edited) What. The. ######. Does. The. Bolded. Mean? I think it means the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor. Edited April 21, 2016 by LGR4GM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 I don't understand what they're looking at. They already decided it was no goal. Are coaches allowed to challenge everything now? I'm pretty sure the refs just humored Florida by letting them waste their challenge on something they couldn't even challenge. Wtf. The refs didn't know themselves. They're making a mockery of this game. They kept their timeout. so feelings > health. Got it In the meantime, Abdelkader still never got a suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Wouldn't it be nice if the ref would communicate clearly with the fans? What. The. ######. Does. The. Bolded. Mean? (viii) The video review process shall be permitted to assist the Referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are “good hockey goals”). For example (but not limited to), pucks that enter the net by going through the net meshing, pucks that enter the net from underneath the net frame, pucks that hit the spectator netting prior to being directed immediately into the goal, pucks that enter the net undetected by the Referee, etc. This would also include situations whereby the Referee stops play or is in the process of stopping the play because he has lost sight of the puck and it is subsequently determined by video review that the puck crosses (or has crossed) the goal line and enters the net as the culmination of a continuous play where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e., the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net at the end of a continuous play). Best guess is that on a play that the ref loses sight of the puck AFTER the last contact of the puck w/ a force (or perhaps any "thing"?) and the puck subsequently ends up in the net it "could" be a good goal. :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 It's quite apparent which team Napoleon wants to win in this Panthers game tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 What a goal by Coyle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 What a goal by Coyle. First thing I saw when I turned on the game was a replay of it. Holy, that was somethin else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 I'm fighting a supreme inner conflict. I hate Dallas, I still haven't gotten over '99, and the thought of them getting another championship makes me somewhat ill. However, I really want the closest approximation of fire wagon hockey we have to be a huge success so maybe, just maybe, teams realize offense, speed, and aggressiveness can win too and we get some better hockey as a result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Average goals per game in the regular season: 5.42 Average goals in the postseason up to this point: 4.82 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Man the sharks looking good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 (edited) Shaw gets a one game suspension for using a homophobic slur.He deserved it. Is anyone else tired of this "just the one guy" system being employed by the league/refs this postseason? I get why they do it, but it's such an extremely arbitrary way to potentially decide games, especially ones this important. LA and SJ were playing a great, tightly contested game, regular scrum ensues, Carter does absolutely nothing out of the ordinary in the scrum, and the ref does his "just the one" thing and awards SJ a PP. They score of course, grab the lead and all the momentum, and now it's 2-0. I know, "LA should stop them from scoring on the PP." No. They shouldn't have been put in that position by an arbitrary, undeserved call. The referee basically flipping a coin in his head probably decides the outcome in this game. Bleh. Edited April 21, 2016 by Thorny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Average goals per game in the regular season: 5.42 Average goals in the postseason up to this point: 4.82 Know what will drive up viewers and fans on a boring product? Ads, ticket pricing increases, challenges, and, wait for it....lockouts!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Getting interesting in SJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 21, 2016 Report Share Posted April 21, 2016 Looked like Jones tripped Brown there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.