WildCard Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 (edited) I like them just fine, but I'm ready for something new.I wouldn't mind the Stars or Sharks going to the Cup, but other than that, at least Chicago is fun to watch I'm going to go with "ignored" rather than "missed" ;)Incompetence or mallice? Edited April 22, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 I wouldn't mind the Stars or Sharks going to the Cup, but other than that, at least Chicago is fun to watch Incompetence or mallice? Oh, I don't think it's pro-Chicago bias, it's just typical NHL playoff officiating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 I wonder where Hitchcock would go if they lost this series Oh, I don't think it's pro-Chicago bias, it's just typical NHL playoff officiating.Thar icing call lends credence to this view. That was turrible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Jesus Kane, that's not even fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Jesus Kane, that's not even fair That was pretty crazy. That's also what a $10.5 million player looks like :angel:Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 That was pretty crazy. Â That's also what a $10.5 million player looks like :angel: Comes up big in the playoffs and manufactures his own goal ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Kane was great there and Toews....well he was just parked solidly in front as close to Crawford as legally allowed and ended up tying up 2 defenseman while Kane circled the net. Jack and Samson anyone? We can only hope they end up as clutch as these 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Maybe if Toews and Kane showed up the first four games of the series, they wouldn't be down 3-2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Maybe if Toews and Kane showed up the first four games of the series, they wouldn't be down 3-2.  Maybe the plan was to lose 3 of 4 to give the Blues a false sense of confidence so they can crush it all in a Game 7 comeback. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Easy on that stuff, my man. I gotta tough it out on ibuprofen until I drive home from my appt this morning. This ssssuuuuuucks. Â I fell asleep before overtime, bummed that the Blackhawks won. Â I love him, but Steve Ott isn't even as good as Legwand anymore. Â The guy that Kane punchiscized 3 times in the had a nice move to score the game winner for Florida last night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Kane's winner was ridiculous. Not many players in the league could do that. Of course, the Blues also couldn't have defended it much worse. I have no clue what Pietrangelo was doing, and you have Shattenkirk stepping on Elliott's stick. Downright Sabres-esque. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 In the crazy but potentially true category, does there come a point where the Pens realize they are better without Malkin, with how this team is constructed? Absolutely rolling without him, he comes back and they look pretty terrible. It's only been two games this playoffs, but, this regular season: Penguins Goals Per Game With Malkin: 2.69 Without Malkin: 3.54 It's a 26 game sample size, so not tiny. But their are some mitigating factors such as the coaching change taking place.  Doh!! :blush:  Tjey know they're done next round anyhowNot so sure about that, playing in the Atlantic.  I like them just fine, but I'm ready for something new. I am 100% ready for something new. I'm getting bored with Chicago being there time and time again.  Comes up big in the playoffs and manufactures his own goal ;)  Maybe if Toews and Kane showed up the first four games of the series, they wouldn't be down 3-2. Ya. I mean, they haven't been clutch, if that even exists (looking at you, True). They've been nearly invisible. Great play by Kane on the goal, and maybe they'll turn it around. But the two of them have been a disappointment thus far this series.  But I'm sure being down 2 to St. Louis will again mean nothing and they'll go on their usual march to the final. Not sarcasm, it's gonna happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 I've only seen game 5 of the series, but Toews looked dangerous. Â I saw him hit the post at least twice last night (I fell asleep after regulation). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 I've only seen game 5 of the series, but Toews looked dangerous. Â I saw him hit the post at least twice last night (I fell asleep after regulation). He's had moments where he's looked dangerous, particularly yesterday. But on the whole he's not been up to his usual antics. Rather in line with his regular season, this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted April 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 He's had moments where he's looked dangerous, particularly yesterday. But on the whole he's not been up to his usual antics. Rather in line with his regular season, this year. Â Â Toews? Â Antics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Toews? Â Antics? If they can't spell/pronounce their own last name, it's antics. :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 For the series they have been mostly held down but the play last night with their season on the line was clutch. Those two have a history of clutch plays in the playoffs. Kane is 3rd in NHL history with 5 ot goals in the playoffs. Is that not clutch? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 For the series they have been mostly held down but the play last night with their season on the line was clutch. Those two have a history of clutch plays in the playoffs. Kane is 3rd in NHL history with 5 ot goals in the playoffs. Is that not clutch? TrueBlue would say that's not clutch, that's just what Patrick Kane does all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 TrueBlue would say that's not clutch, that's just what Patrick Kane does all the time. Maybe other players are clutch because they win the game in regulation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 TrueBlue would say that's not clutch, that's just what Patrick Kane does all the time. Yup, and agreed. Maybe other players are clutch because they win the game in regulation A good point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Maybe other players are clutch because they win the game in regulation Maybe everybody's clutch. Maybe nobody is.  Maybe Drew Stafford is the only clutch player in the universe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Maybe everybody's clutch. Maybe nobody is.  Maybe Drew Stafford is the only clutch player in the universe. Maybe Drew Stafford, and all of us for that matter, are a projection of your consciousness and a figment of your imagination. Down the rabbit hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 TrueBlue would say that's not clutch, that's just what Patrick Kane does all the time. Â The best definition I've heard of clutch -- and it's one that's sort of been cobbled together from various sources (including from posters here) -- is that it refers to doing what you ordinarily and normally do under high-stakes and high-pressure situations. It's not elevating your game; it's maintaining your game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 (edited) Yup, and agreed.  A good point. You were just saying they had been held down the whole series so breaking free and scoring the game winner in OT of the Stanley Cup playoffs is indeed clutch and nobody else was clutch in regulation or OT or else Kane could not have been. Clutch or not he and Toews came through with their season on the line. I'm not banging the drum for the Hawks more so looking forward to that type of play from the Sabres in the future. The best definition I've heard of clutch -- and it's one that's sort of been cobbled together from various sources (including from posters here) -- is that it refers to doing what you ordinarily and normally do under high-stakes and high-pressure situations. It's not elevating your game; it's maintaining your game.This is a reasonable explanation of what i believe clutch to be as well, thank you Edited April 22, 2016 by Murray's Rats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 You were just saying they had been held down the whole series so breaking free and scoring the game winner in OT of the Stanley Cup playoffs is indeed clutch and nobody else was clutch in regulation or OT or else Kane could not have been. Clutch or not he and Toews came through with their season on the line. I'm not banging the drum for the Hawks more so looking forward to that type of play from the Sabres in the future. But if Kane was being held down all series, and finally came through for a goal, that's not clutch. That inadequate performance, followed by an eventual stroke of brilliance. I like Smell's definition. It's maintaining your great play. Not disappearing and occasionally reappearing. A player that talented is always eventually going to put something together, given enough time. That's not clutch, it's the law of averages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.