Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 You don't build your team at the trade deadline. If you are a contender you try to rent your way over the top and if you are tearing it down to rebuild then you sell whatever you can for picks. The Sabres are neither right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Could replace Gionta next year at half the price. I'm interested. You don't build your team at the trade deadline. If you are a contender you try to rent your way over the top and if you are tearing it down to rebuild then you sell whatever you can for picks. The Sabres are neither right now. You can definitely build with Teuvo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3putt Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Be wary of Teuvo. Second team that sees him as expendable. Skilled but hasn't adapted to NA physicality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 You can definitely build with Teuvo Cup winner, so he must be good, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Josh Manson in play per SN. Anaheim D Man, Foligno or Zemgus? Foligno please. You don't build your team at the trade deadline. If you are a contender you try to rent your way over the top and if you are tearing it down to rebuild then you sell whatever you can for picks. The Sabres are neither right now. You build your team as opportunities present themselves. Shouldn't get locked into a rigid structure of when doing something is appropriate. Be wary of Teuvo. Second team that sees him as expendable. Skilled but hasn't adapted to NA physicality. I'm not giving up a ton for him, but he can play a role next year at the right price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Foligno please. You build your team as opportunities present themselves. Shouldn't get locked into a rigid structure of when doing something is appropriate. Yep. Sounds about right. Although, I've been watching Anaheim since the start of the new year, Joshua benefits from his pairing partner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 (edited) Cup winner, so he must be good, right? Well, people do keep telling me than winning has intrinsic value... :p Edited March 1, 2017 by TrueBlueGED Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 The New York Islanders are talking with teams about Joshua Ho-Sang, according to a league source. The... espn.com/espn/now?nowId… Trash, damaged goods, punk. When you have attitude problems the size of this kid, pass! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Boston in talks for Kulikov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Trash, damaged goods, punk. When you have attitude problems the size of this kid, pass! Looks good in the A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thwomp! Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Lack of rumors is typically a good thing. And lack of moves corresponding with those lack of rumors? You don't build your team at the trade deadline. If you are a contender you try to rent your way over the top and if you are tearing it down to rebuild then you sell whatever you can for picks. The Sabres are neither right now. Something needs to change somewhere. The status quo is unacceptable. I agree with you that the Sabres defy description right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Looks good in the A He's very talented, but he's had attitude problems going back to junior. I'm sorry we don't need this kind of kid, regardless of how good he is. More Swedes/Finns, less arrogant punks ty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Boston in talks for Kulikov I'd give him to the Bruins for a bag o' pucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Boston in talks for Kulikov Straight up for Marchand. Then we can bury that little in the canal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 And lack of moves corresponding with those lack of rumors? Are you implying a casual relationship between rumors and actual moves? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Boston in talks for Kulikov I would not trade with those ###############, ########## out of spite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 I would not trade with those ###############, ########## out of spite. If the offer is good, and its for a rental, who gives a . We're not trading them Evander. Kulikov by metrics, in terms of on ice play has been terrible here. Anything of Forsbacka Karlsson, 2nd round pick, Lindgren....I'd be all about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 He's very talented, but he's had attitude problems going back to junior. I'm sorry we don't need this kind of kid, regardless of how good he is. More Swedes/Finns, less arrogant punks ty! This mindset is always bogus. You always take talented kids even if they have attitude problems. The team that trades those kids always misses out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 You build your team as opportunities present themselves. Shouldn't get locked into a rigid structure of when doing something is appropriate. Sure, but I am just pointing out the reality of most deadline trades. I can't remember a 'hockey trade' happening on any trade deadline day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thwomp! Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Are you implying a casual relationship between rumors and actual moves? Why yes, yes I am. There are several instances in this thread alone where rumor turns to completed deal soon thereafter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Sure, but I am just pointing out the reality of most deadline trades. I can't remember a 'hockey trade' happening on any trade deadline day. Kane and Bogosian Hodgson and Kassian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 This mindset is always bogus. You always take talented kids even if they have attitude problems. The team that trades those kids always misses out. At the same time, distractions are distractions. He's just a headcase. I like the talent, and he does some nifty things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Sure, but I am just pointing out the reality of most deadline trades. I can't remember a 'hockey trade' happening on any trade deadline day. Ah gotcha. I thought you were making a philosophical statement. My bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Kane and Bogosian Hodgson and Kassian The Kane ... deal happened a few weeks prior to the deadline and I would not count it as a deadline deal. As for the second trade you mentioned ... :w00t: ... that's all I have to say on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 The Kane ... deal happened a few weeks prior to the deadline and I would not count it as a deadline deal. As for the second trade you mentioned ... :w00t: ... that's all I have to say on that one. the Kane deal was definitely a deadline deal. just because it didn't happen the day of doesn't mean it wasn't deadline influenced Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.