Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
WildCard

GDT: Buffalo @ LA Kings, 10-17-2019, 10:30 pm EDT

Recommended Posts

Well, Carter earned that one.

Great stuff for him. Two point for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Quantum Mechanics II a couple semesters ago, I had safely padded my grades with a second midterm exam score that was well above the class average. I still did the homework and studied for the final, and thought I did pretty well, and somehow wound up getting a 32%. The score was so bad it was funny, and was harmless in the grand scheme of things, I still safely passed the class. 

That's what this game was. The Sabres have played enough good hockey this season that I don't care about the last two periods and can simply laugh at how goofy the numbers wound up looking.

6-1-1, two more points banked baby! We're now behind the vaunted 08-09 team's pace to start though ?

Get some rest and BEAT THE SHARKS 

And put Skinner back with Jack because at this point I just miss my smiley friend Jeff pumping in goals from his pal 

Edited by Randall Flagg
  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

I would prefer he shoots on a goalie that is stone cold.  

With a 1 or 2 goal lead I agree.  But with a 3 goal lead, I like it.

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They played pretty well the first half of the game and Hutton was very good.  That was enough tonight vs these LA Kong’s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone help me out?

Who is in first place in the National Hockey League?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Doohickie said:

With a 1 or 2 goal lead I agree.  But with a 3 goal lead, I like it.

I'd love to see the percentage of time each of these leads is lost in the third period. I'd put money on there being a MASSIVE drop between 2 and 3. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

That's what this game was.

This game may or may not have been quantum physics.  We can't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Doohickie said:

This game may or may not have been quantum physics.  We can't know for sure.

Deep man, deep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Marty has a mancrush on Hutts.

Just now, inkman said:

Good teams win games

fify

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...