Jump to content

Ullmark Signed to Two Year Extension


Brawndo

Recommended Posts

Good news.

Anyone see a tie-in to expansion?

Does this mean Lehner is on his way out?

 

#desperateforjbottodosomething

Definitely a tie-in to expansion, but not that Lehner is out. More of a "here's the price tag" announcement to LV and McPhee. It's either going to warn LV off, or serve as an enticement.

 

Does anyone who knows more about AHL contract requirements know how much that might be if he's in AHL full-time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lehner to Calgary for a something exempt and the rights to Chad Johnson, flip the prospects and picks for a defenceman.

We protect Ullmark, expose Johnson and Bogo (who won't get picked) to comply with the rules and sign the best free agent goalie available. Played for Vancouver, Ryan something or other.

Edited by dudacek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

 

Let's say Lehner's agent told JBott that Lehner wants $5MM x 5 years, and JBott thinks he can probably get a deal done for $4.5MM x 4 years, but not much less.

 

Would JBott rather pay that price for Lehner, or expose him in the expansion draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lehner to Calgary for a something exempt and the rights to Chad Johnson, flip the prospects and picks for a defenceman.

We protect Ullmark, expose Johnson and Bogo (who won't get picked) to comply with the rules and sign the best free agent goalie available. Played for Vancouver, Ryan something or other.

Are you proposing Miller time? I like Lehner, but I love Miller. I'd freak out if we brought him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you proposing Miller time? I like Lehner, but I love Miller. I'd freak out if we brought him back.

 

If we trade Lehner and are looking for a short-term back-up while Ullmark and Peterson (hopefully) mature, he is the best candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this is a sign that Lehner will be exposed.

 

In 20 games in 15-16 Ullmarks GAA was actually less than Lehners last year and his save % was a fraction more. Both are 6'4" and Ullmark is a steal at his AAV.

 

Especially with Cal Peterson a year or two away, this gives them more room to make Peterson an offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this is a sign that Lehner will be exposed.

 

In 20 games in 15-16 Ullmarks GAA was actually less than Lehners last year and his save % was a fraction more. Both are 6'4" and Ullmark is a steal at his AAV.

 

Especially with Cal Peterson a year or two away, in another teams farm system, this gives them more room to make Peterson an offer.

 

Yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or it means that a deal is in place for both to stay in Buffalo and for LV to take someone else in expansion.

 

Yeah i'd imagine this is the case.

 

Also, what is the harm in exposing Lehner? If LV has a deal for MA Fluery, they wouldn't take Lehner and pay goalies around $10 million for next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i'd imagine this is the case.

 

Also, what is the harm in exposing Lehner? If LV has a deal for MA Fluery, they wouldn't take Lehner and pay goalies around $10 million for next season.

 

LV could flip him, I suppose, but you make a good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...