Jump to content

Kessel and Phaunef for Reinhart, Hodgson and Gionta?


Tolstoy

Recommended Posts

no thanks. Don't see the value here as our team is built to grow together. We already have O'Reilly and Kane don't see the need to toss away Reinhart who should have a better career then both of those players early in his career and should blow them both away when he hits their ages

Edited by ddaryl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL! NO!  There is no reason you give that team any breathe.  Phaneuf is a good player, but that contract is completely attrocious.  You're telling me you want to add 15.25M on the cap while we have RFA's of Mark Pysyk, Johan Larsson, and a few others.  O'Reilly is not signed.  Next season:  Lehner, Ristolainen, Girgensons and a few others are again RFA's.  This makes literally 0 sense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This possible trade is proposed on the Hockey Writers site: http://thehockeywriters.com/the-leafs-most-logical-trade-partner-the-sabres/

 

Would you make the trade? I don't think I would, mainly because I would have a hard time parting with Reinhart. The kid is billed to be a future #1 center. 

Hell no...two players with Zero work ethic and huge contracts you can't get rid of...no thanks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the only way Reinhart gets traded is if someone outrageous becomes available, like Toews, Kane, etc. And even then maybe not. He was Tim Murray's first selection as a GM, when he basically had the pick of the litter of forwards. He believes in Reinhart, and isn't going to trade him for underachievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the only way Reinhart gets traded is if someone outrageous becomes available, like Toews, Kane, etc. And even then maybe not. He was Tim Murray's first selection as a GM, when he basically had the pick of the litter of forwards. He believes in Reinhart, and isn't going to trade him for underachievers.

 

Or an extremely valuable #1 defensemen.  On another site there were names like Seth Jones thrown out there.  I'd rather keep Sam.  As he "WILL", be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...