Jump to content

Bjork-Eakin-Hayden 2nd Worst Line in NHL (now 437 out of 438)


JoeSchmoe

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

Eakin line was constantly hemmed in their own zone. At one point it took Dahlin saying f it, and willing the puck up ice to get a change because Eakin was inept at winning a single battle. It's amazing how many plays die on his stick,  even simple ones. Hinostroza was so fortunate to get away from him and poor Hayden, just dragging an anchor around all night. 

Every time Eakin is near the puck post faceoff, terrible things happen for the Sabres.  He can’t pass, shoot, clear the zone, or do anything required of an NHL hockey player.  If he somehow is on the team next season, I will have no hope for this team as they have brought in an all star team of statisticians. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, inkman said:

Every time Eakin is near the puck post faceoff, terrible things happen for the Sabres.  He can’t pass, shoot, clear the zone, or do anything required of an NHL hockey player.  If he somehow is on the team next season, I will have no hope for this team as they have brought in an all star team of statisticians. 

If he's is re signed, it's clear the analytics department isn't part of anything. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, inkman said:

Every time Eakin is near the puck post faceoff, terrible things happen for the Sabres.  He can’t pass, shoot, clear the zone, or do anything required of an NHL hockey player.  If he somehow is on the team next season, I will have no hope for this team as they have brought in an all star team of statisticians. 

Yeah, he wins a few draws but he struggles with basic tasks as you say. Even on the PK, he gets in lanes but he lacks quickness to pressure opponents and he cannot win a puck battle. He makes me wonder if he is capable of icing the puck let alone clearing the zone.

He is one of the worst players I have seen that gets a regular shift. I don’t know what DG sees. Jankowski brings more in my opinion.

We have had whipping boys in the past like Stafford, but he produced a lot more than Eakin.

Edited by French Collection
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't one of the ESPN announcers call him an *established face off guy* ? They went on about the Sabres center spin is so young and it takes years to become proficient at face offs that the Sabres rely on him heavily.

Which is all fine and dandy, but I want my young guys taking faceoffs this year when wins don't matter. 

Edited by woods-racer
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I view this line as a positive. Once the unofficial Tank is done (next season) it will be an immediate upgrade to replace these turds with replacement level players or better. Guys like Okposo and Asplund will be taking their ice time as they are bumped down by Quinn and Peterka. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
33 minutes ago, bob_sauve28 said:

 

I had no idea this was going on, for some reason.  Glad he's well.

19 minutes ago, woods-racer said:

Glad he is doing good. Has to be the most depressing thing in the world being locked up like that.

I had to do it three times for five days each and I was clawing at the walls.  I can't imagine doing it for weeks on end.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • JoeSchmoe changed the title to Bjork-Eakin-Hayden Worst Line in NHL (now 412 out of 412)
54 minutes ago, JoeSchmoe said:

It's been a while since I looked at this since Bjork has been benched, and I was unaware of Hayden being quarantined, but with a bunch more line combos playing together for 100min or more they're now 412 of 412 in expected goal % for.

How about Eakin Girgs Okposo?

May not have reached 100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marvin, Sabres Fan said:

Wow.  Eakin drops the two most defencively sound forwards the Sabres have that far.  He's this season's Vladimir Sobotka.

Even if you're defensively sound, you still have to get more scoring opportunities that your opposition. Girgs usually fails in this department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
12 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

How is the VO, Z and Eakin line ranked.

I assume you mean KO?  According to Money Puck, using 150 minutes as the minimum minutes played, that line ranks 31st best in Expected goals against per 60 minutes out of 89 qualifying lines with 2.23.  So top third. Unfortunately their Expected GF/60 ranking is 86 out of 89.  I wouldn’t have guessed that bad.  They have had good possession numbers the last 8 games but maybe not out chancing the opponent according to the fancy stats. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Broken Ankles said:

I assume you mean KO?  According to Money Puck, using 150 minutes as the minimum minutes played, that line ranks 31st best in Expected goals against per 60 minutes out of 89 qualifying lines with 2.23.  So top third. Unfortunately their Expected GF/60 ranking is 86 out of 89.  I wouldn’t have guessed that bad.  They have had good possession numbers the last 8 games but maybe not out chancing the opponent according to the fancy stats. 

 

This also probably has a good bit to do with matchups, that line matches up against the other team’s top 6 pretty frequently.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

How is the KO, Z and Eakin line ranked.

Using the same 100 minute scale as used with the steaming garbage line, they're 369 out of 438. Not good.

However... The bigger news is the steaming garbage line is out of the cellar!!!! They are now a respectable 437 out of 438.

Crouse-Galchenyuk-Kessel now hold down last spot. By a fair margin too. They're 25% vs 30.8% for Bjork and friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • JoeSchmoe changed the title to Bjork-Eakin-Hayden 2nd Worst Line in NHL (now 437 out of 438)
15 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

He still needs to go.

Nobody needs to go unless they have an upgrade ready. Team chemistry might seem like a new thing around here but it's important. idk if Eakin has any role in that but if he does I don't get rid of him just to get rid of him. If you can sign Andrew Copp or somebody for reasonable money sure, ditch him, but we need to retain leadership and chemistry. Again, not sure he brings any of that, but the RJ thing makes me think maybe he does. and he did help us win an OT 🙂

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoeSchmoe said:

Krebs, Cozens, Mittelstadt,  Thompson, Girgensens, and a moist towelette are all upgrades at C over Eakin. I think we're good. 

Disagree. Krebs and Girgs are both wingers in this line up and nobody on the team can win a face off. An upgrade would be a role player with a similar (but better) skill set. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

but the RJ thing makes me think maybe he does. and he did help us win an OT 🙂

He also came up with the Flint Tropics thing.  I think he's a "leader" in the room much the same way John Scott was.  You need your serious leaders (Follow me, boys!!) but you also need people in the room to keep things light.  I think Eakin falls in the second category.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, The Ghost of Yuri said:

He also came up with the Flint Tropics thing.  I think he's a "leader" in the room much the same way John Scott was.  You need your serious leaders (Follow me, boys!!) but you also need people in the room to keep things light.  I think Eakin falls in the second category.

There are a lot of "good guys" out there.  We need one that is better at faceoffs and doesn't need Girgs and KO flanking him every night to be effective. 

The major issue with signing a new JAG over an old JAG is how they do in the teams system, and this is why we might see another year of Eakin.  I'm hoping they are able to bring in a 30-something center with some battle wounds that can play up and down the lineup.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...