Rasmus_ Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 Makarov was going to go back the KHL. There is literally no staying power in his game. He's never been consistent since his post junior play. He would have had to prove his way and doubters the entire way to earn a spot even as a back-up, ala Jonas Enroth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 Cmon man thats not even funny I'd take him in a heartbeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 I'd take him in a heartbeat. +1, he's a pain in the ass to play against, and if you add him to your top six in combination of Evander you have two players not afraid to go into the rough areas. He's not going to be worth his cap figure, but if you get him at around $6M, and he's willing to come to Buffalo you have to consider it. I have no love for him from his Bruins days of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 I don't know that he has lots of money, but Columbus would certainly have a lot of students and a lot of bars catering to the under-25 set. Winnipeg would be less fun, certainly. Probably Edmonton and Detroit, too. But the guy never really spent time here anyway, so whatever. Valid points sir, thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 Lucic is not the same player he was when he ran Miller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted June 6, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 Lucic is not the same player he was when he ran Miller. True. But he does seem to still be the same a-hole he always was. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 True. But he does seem to still be the same a-hole he always was. ;) Well that's never going to change. Risto showed him the future though last time the Kings came through Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 9, 2016 Report Share Posted June 9, 2016 Heard young Justin Bailey on WGR with Coller and Ree-vay today, and, man - the kid just sounds like the truth when he says every correct thing. I am really hoping he pans out. Or is valuable enough to be part of a deal that brings in a key piece. Whichever, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 I keep seeing in the other threads when we all show a line up, no one seems to mention Evan Rodriguez. I was pretty impressed with him. Nobody thinks he can make it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 I think he has a slightly better chance of starting in Buffalo next year than Fasching or Bailey, but my money is on all three starting the year in Rochester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 I keep seeing in the other threads when we all show a line up, no one seems to mention Evan Rodriguez. I was pretty impressed with him. Nobody thinks he can make it? It took him 2/3 of a season to get it in the AHL. I'd bet more on Carrier than Rodrigues at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 I think he has a slightly better chance of starting in Buffalo next year than Fasching or Bailey, but my money is on all three starting the year in Rochester. I don't think ERod has any chance of starting in Buffalo while Fasching and Bailey have slight-to-decent chances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 I don't think ERod has any chance of starting in Buffalo while Fasching and Bailey have slight-to-decent chances. Because of his style and his age, I can see him as an energy guy on the fourth with upward mobility in the right circumstances. The other two are far better prospects, that's why the Sabres won't bury them on the fourth, they will be feeding them plenty of ice in the AHL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 So this hasn't changed much since the draft completed. Coming out of the draft we're looking at: Ennis - O'Reilly - Kane Vesey - Eichel - Reinhart Foligno - Girgensons - Gionta Moulson - Larsson - Deslauriers Kulikov - Risto McCabe - Bogo Gorges - Franson Lehner - ??? Nothing too inspiring there. We still need a good upgrade on the wing for the top six (even if Vesey signs, ESPECIALLY if he doesn't). Obviously a Stamkos addition changes the whole look here. O'Reilly - Stamkos - Kane Vesey - Eichel - Reinhart Ennis - Girgensons - Gionta Foligno - Larsson - Deslauriers A certain upgrade and a legitimate top-six group there. It also makes it easier to ship out guys like Girgensons, Ennis and/or Folingo for another dman. It would have to be a cheaper dman because with Stamkos in the mix the cap management will start early and be tough going forward. Say we move Girgensons, Gorges and a 2017 pick for Marco Scandella (no idea if this is near value, just did it off the top of my head). O'Reilly - Stamkos - Kane Vesey - Eichel - Reinhart Foligno - Ennis - Gionta Moulson - Larsson - Deslauriers Scandella - Risto Kulikov - Bogo McCabe - Franson Lehner That's a lineup I'm feeling good about. Just a quick mockup and it'd be tough to pay all these players down the road. It'd also be tough to figure out the expansion draft (you'd obviously do 4-4-1 in this scenario). Protect: Stamkos, O'Reilly, Kane, Ennis/Foligno/Larsson, Risto, Scandella, Kulikov and McCabe/Bogo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 You know, looking at the lineup above made me think a bit. Why not get rid of Foligno already? The Sabs can get *something* for him, right? And Bailey can step in and do the job, possibly better, and definitely for less money. Granted, he's not going to fight, but that's Deslaurier's job anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 You know, looking at the lineup above made me think a bit. Why not get rid of Foligno already? The Sabs can get *something* for him, right? And Bailey can step in and do the job, possibly better, and definitely for less money. Granted, he's not going to fight, but that's Deslaurier's job anyway.I don't think Bailey is anywhere near the player that Foligno is. Foligno is a good physical presence, a punishing hitter, solid in his own end, and is a better scorer at the NHL level. Right now, Bailey is just faster. While I think it's likely that Bailey grows into a better player than Foligno, he's not even close right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 I don't think Bailey is anywhere near the player that Foligno is. Foligno is a good physical presence, a punishing hitter, solid in his own end, and is a better scorer at the NHL level. Right now, Bailey is just faster. While I think it's likely that Bailey grows into a better player than Foligno, he's not even close right now. Wow, we see different things. I look at Foligno and see a waste of a roster spot and (what is about to be) $2.5M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Wow, we see different things. I look at Foligno and see a waste of a roster spot and (what is about to be) $2.5M.He's nothing special, but he's a solid 3rd line banger. I'm hoping that his consistency issues are behing him, but if they aren't he'll still have value in a trade. Bailey isn't even a NHLer yet. Just a prospect with promise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 (edited) He's nothing special, but he's a solid 3rd line banger. I'm hoping that his consistency issues are behing him, but if they aren't he'll still have value in a trade. Bailey isn't even a NHLer yet. Just a prospect with promise. HE STILL COSTS $2.5M if the Sabres give him a qualifying offer. Edited June 26, 2016 by Eleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 HE STILL COSTS $2.5M if the Sabres give him a qualifying offer.And? Seems like a fair price to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 And? Seems like a fair price to me. We have a salary cap that is stagnant. Half of the posters, or more, on this board want the Sabres to give Steven Stamkos 7 x $12M. Just traded $1M for $4.5M on the blueline. Reinhart, Eichel, Risto, etc. will have to get paid someday. Might need a goaltender. Definitely will need some defensemen. Can't spend $2.5M on Marcus Foligno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 I could see Foligno becoming a cap casualty of the Sabres sign Stamkos. Murray mentioned role players making a few million per season would need to be replaced with players on ELCs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Even if we spend 2.5 on Foligno we can still trade him. Our cap number can change big time overnight with trades. It's not an issue right now, so I don't understand being concerned with Foligno's cap hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Even if we spend 2.5 on Foligno we can still trade him. Our cap number can change big time overnight with trades. It's not an issue right now, so I don't understand being concerned with Foligno's cap hit. How do I find the Western Air Temple? Because we're gonna fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 In a world where Trevor Lewis is worth $2M, Marcus Foligno is worth $2.5M and likely more. Now, I've got one foot in the camp of I don't want to be the team to pay him what he's worth, so I'm fine moving him depending on return and whether we need that cap space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.