pi2000 Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 http://thehockeypress.sportsblog.com/posts/3180304/nhl-trade-rumors--patrick-kane-to-buffalo-sabres.html Apparently Buffalo inquired, but who really knows. Would you give up Reinhart, Moulson and 2nd for him as the article suggests? IMO it takes much more than that to get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabills Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 No, I don't really want him near my team if this rape stuff is true. Obviously he hasn't been charged and we don't know the story, so I'll let it play out, but they won't trade him unless it happened (or at least appears to have happened), and if it happened I don't want him here. That cabbie thing was bad enough to make me not like the guy, but I was willing to pass it off as SUPER stupid drunk kid stuff, but rape is another level that I'll have nothing to do with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 Regardless of his off the ice issues, I didn't watch a tank for two years to part ways with Reinhart before he even plays 20 games. Last thing I want is to do that and have him become the next Thornton or Seguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabills Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 Regardless of his off the ice issues, I didn't watch a tank for two years to part ways with Reinhart before he even plays 20 games. Last thing I want is to do that and have him become the next Thornton or Seguin Add that to his cap number being prohibitive with what the rest of these guys will be making in 5 years, and it just doesn't make a lot of sense. Not that I mind GMTM asking I guess, if they tell him they'd take a 2nd rounder for him Murray could just take the deal and hope for the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 (edited) Add that to his cap number being prohibitive with what the rest of these guys will be making in 5 years, and it just doesn't make a lot of sense. Not that I mind GMTM asking I guess, if they tell him they'd take a 2nd rounder for him Murray could just take the deal and hope for the best. Well if you get rid of Samson the cap numbers no longer really become an issue; at worst they'll be the same problems Chicago had I.e. dumping complimentary players and replacing them Edited September 3, 2015 by WildCard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 No thanks. GO SABRES!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 Interesting. I'd dismiss this report out of hand, but it has some indicia of reliability. I agree that any of our young jewels is too much to pay for the guy. Especially with the legal matter still pending. Also: No thanks. I'd sooner bargain with the devil at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musichunch Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Imagine how awkward the marketing would be, considering the alleged rape happened around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Sure.. Let's give them Miller straight up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 On that trade: no. On that source: no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 On that trade: ###### no. On that source: ###### no. Never heard of that source before. If you don't mind me asking, how do you know they're unreliable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 No, I don't really want him near my team if this rape stuff is true. Obviously he hasn't been charged and we don't know the story, so I'll let it play out, but they won't trade him unless it happened (or at least appears to have happened), and if it happened I don't want him here. That cabbie thing was bad enough to make me not like the guy, but I was willing to pass it off as SUPER stupid drunk kid stuff, but rape is another level that I'll have nothing to do with. I don't want him anywhere near this team even if the rape stuff is false. This team has spent too much time to get to the point where they're at now. Just not worth what it would take to bring him here along with his ridiculous contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 On that trade: ###### no. On that source: ###### no. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BagBoy Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 I don't want him anywhere near this team even if the rape stuff is false. This team has spent too much time to get to the point where they're at now. Just not worth what it would take to bring him here along with his ridiculous contract. Exactly how I feel. There is no way he's worth it from a cap perspective, a PR perspective, a locker room perspective. He's about as desirable as Phil Kessel to me, only not as fat, and way dumber off the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Exactly how I feel. There is no way he's worth it from a cap perspective, a PR perspective, a locker room perspective. He's about as desirable as Phil Kessel to me, only not as fat, and way dumber off the ice. I would have taken Phil Kessel on this team, for a reasonable price. I want no part of acquiring Kane, as things stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Great hockey player. Apparently he needs work on the rest. Not so great person ? We all have faults but come on. This guys a train wreck. NO thanks. I'm jacked about what Samson will do for this team in 2 years when we are contending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 As Tank (sorry, but you're forever Tank to me) hinted, can we wait for this to come from someone reliable? This is a crap source. May or may not be correct, but still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Never heard of that source before. If you don't mind me asking, how do you know they're unreliable? Your first sentence answers your second. Hell, I've never heard of them. A quick google yields nothing. Bad source. Look at their home page. This is the blog equivalent to "hockeyyyyyinsideerrrrrrr." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Sure.. Let's give them Miller straight up I laughed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustache of God Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Reinhardt, Moulson & a 2nd Round pick so we can wear Chicago's dirty laundry? No thanks. I think #OneBuffalo has taken on enough "high-risk" players this past year. Reinhardt & Eichel will be the face of this franchise for a long time, the Toews/Kane combo for the Sabres (minus the allleged sexual assault hopefully). The only way I'd even consider considering that trade would be if Chicago retained 80% of Kane's salary/cap hit. Plus how can Murray trade Moulson when he's letting Eichel nest with him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 I didn't want Kane before the investigation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Eliminating the legal issues, why would you nor make this deal for reinhart? Your basically giving up Moulson and a pick tk get a local kid who already is what reinhart may become. And after seeing what his siblings have done so far, I would be leary in putting a big wager on Sam becoming anything big in the NHL. But of course that's only if the legal issues aren't true and he did nothing wrong. Otherwise that and the drunken partying would not be worth the headaches of even considering a deal....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeanbe Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 Eliminating the legal issues, why would you nor make this deal for reinhart? Your basically giving up Moulson and a pick tk get a local kid who already is what reinhart may become. And after seeing what his siblings have done so far, I would be leary in putting a big wager on Sam becoming anything big in the NHL. But of course that's only if the legal issues aren't true and he did nothing wrong. Otherwise that and the drunken partying would not be worth the headaches of even considering a deal....... Chicago doesn't trade him. Don't want him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted September 4, 2015 Report Share Posted September 4, 2015 http://thehockeypress.sportsblog.com/posts/3180304/nhl-trade-rumors--patrick-kane-to-buffalo-sabres.html Apparently Buffalo inquired, but who really knows. Would you give up Reinhart, Moulson and 2nd for him as the article suggests? IMO it takes much more than that to get it done. Not buying it. The Hockeypress with no byline or writers with names? hmmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts