Derrico Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Trade proposal on GR this AM. Shatternkirk (dependent on him signing a contract extension) for Pysyk and Girgensons. Thoughts? Love the player. However, two things concern me a bit. First he is a righty and if he shot left I would be more anxious to pull the trigger. Second it looks like he only has one year remaining on his deal. If the trade is similar to ROR and an extension could be signed immediately then yes I would really consider this deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Love the player. However, two things concern me a bit. First he is a righty and if he shot left I would be more anxious to pull the trigger. Second it looks like he only has one year remaining on his deal. If the trade is similar to ROR and an extension could be signed immediately then yes I would really consider this deal. Solution: trade Bogosian :D :D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Plus he would be the PP QB they have been searching for. He is a BU Alum, only if the Sabres had another to play with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 (edited) Probably need a pick to sweeten the pot, not sure a 3rd would do but who knows. Definitely going to need to sweeten that pot. They are under a cap crunch, and do have Parayko who they're very high on to replace Shattenkirk, so he is definitely available Plus he would be the PP QB they have been searching for. He is a BU Alum, only if the Sabres had another to play with him. Is he cheaper, or more easy to get, than Goligoski though? Edited May 3, 2016 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I would do that instantly, which makes me think it's definitely not enough value from our end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I would do that instantly, which makes me think it's definitely not enough value from our end. I imagine they would love Evander Kane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I would do that instantly, which makes me think it's definitely not enough value from our end. Agreed. They'd need to send more than what was floated above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3putt Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Jaden Schwartz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmus_ Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Jaden Schwartz? Drool, love his game. I would say they are more likely to let Backes walk and trade Shattenkirk before letting Schwartz go in a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Drool, love his game. I would say they are more likely to let Backes walk and trade Shattenkirk before letting Schwartz go in a trade. If they win the cup do you think they let Backes walk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 If they win the cup do you think they let Backes walk? Yup. He's not that good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Definitely going to need to sweeten that pot. They are under a cap crunch, and do have Parayko who they're very high on to replace Shattenkirk, so he is definitely available Is he cheaper, or more easy to get, than Goligoski though? Goligoski is an UFA, so he would be free. One of the differences is age however. Shattenkirk is 27, where Goligoski is 30, but he is a lefty something the Sabres are severely lacking. The question is does Dallas let him get to free agency? They are 17 million under the cap with only four NHL D signed for next season Here Goligoski compared to Yandle . Here is Goligoski compared to Shattenkirk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Nice charts Brawndo, thanks for those. Yeah I meant Goligoski price wise compared to Shattenkirk, should have clarified. After watching him in the postseason, he's my dream defender this offseason. Though a younger Shattenkirk, who seems a little more defensively minded while having the offensive tough, would also be very nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Solution: all of the above. Goligoski-Ristolainen Yandle-Shattenkirk McCabe-Pysyk I'll hang up and listen ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Solution: all of the above. Goligoski-Ristolainen Yandle-Shattenkirk McCabe-Pysyk I'll hang up and listen ;) Back to Kashyyyk with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 (edited) Back to Kashyyyk with you. :lol: Edited May 3, 2016 by BRAWNDO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I went to the trade speculation board on hf and made a thread asking what Blues fans thought was fair for Shattenkirk. One proposed Reinhart for Shattenkirk+ a little, one asked for 8th overall by itself, others wanted 8+ other things. Seems like they want 8 and/or next year's first to be the base of a package, and don't seem interested at all in any roster players that we'd be looking to include. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I went to the trade speculation board on hf and made a thread asking what Blues fans thought was fair for Shattenkirk. One proposed Reinhart for Shattenkirk+ a little, one asked for 8th overall by itself, others wanted 8+ other things. Seems like they want 8 and/or next year's first to be the base of a package, and don't seem interested at all in any roster players that we'd be looking to include. I think Girgensons would be a great fit on their roster. Girgensons + 8. is that fair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I think Girgensons would be a great fit on their roster. Girgensons + 8. is that fair? I feel like that's too steep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I feel like that's too steep. That's when you know you have a deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I think Girgensons would be a great fit on their roster. Girgensons + 8. is that fair?I think they might do that. I think I might do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 That's when you know you have a deal. I know. I think they might do that. I think I might do that. If he was a Lefty I probably would but I donno...... Great Dman. I guess at 27 we should still expect 6 more good and productive years..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsb Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I feel like that's too steep. I agree with you, I need more than him for that #8 and Girgs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 I know. If he was a Lefty I probably would but I donno...... Great Dman. I guess at 27 we should still expect 6 more good and productive years..... Trade Bogo soon after, and sign Goligoski. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.