ubkev Posted February 21, 2015 Report Share Posted February 21, 2015 Stewart, Neuvirth, and 2nd for Ryan Miller. Boom! Goalie of the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 If you were TM, who would you target realistically? I've gotten the feeling that Murray would prefer NHL ready prospects over more picks. Me too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 Stewart, Neuvirth, and 2nd for Ryan Miller. Boom! Goalie of the future. Neuvirth? Miller .912 save % Neuvirth .914 save % Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 And just how long has Neurvirth been at it, eh? Eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K8prisoner Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 The tank is causing mass rationalization and insanity.. Like the ole us blues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLaLaFontaine Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 (edited) Stewart, Neuvirth, and 2nd for Ryan Miller.Miller is average ;) By the way why not swap Hodgson with Kassian. i believe both playes need a change of scenery :D Edited February 22, 2015 by LaLaLaFontaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 Friedman reports the Pens are interested in trading for Jordan Staal, more likely an offseason move. The Wings maybe looking for forward help as Frazen is out with a concussion and is not even skating at this point. The Bruins have no interest in trading Chara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
French Collection Posted February 22, 2015 Report Share Posted February 22, 2015 Both Staal's may be out of Carolina by 2016. Eric has lost a step and Jordan has not been effective since his days in Pittsburgh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Also, the Canucks Ryan Miller went down tonight, and I am hearing they made a call to Buffalo looking at Michal Neuvirth as a possible pickup...Neuvirth has shown he can perform in the playoffs previously... The early indications on the Miller injury are very hush-hush, but those close fear the worst. its from ecklund but guess it would make sense if miller is down for a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted February 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 (edited) Just going to retract what I said. Vancouver trading for Neuvirth doesn't make sense unless a few things are in play... If they're trading for Neuvirth it's because Miller is gone for the season. They already have Lack and Markstrom behind Miller. If Miller is out short-term they're not going to call up Markstrom because they'll have to waive Lack/Markstrom to send them down when Miller gets back. If Miller is out long-term then they could just call up Markstrom for the rest of the season and be safe... The only way they make a Neuvirth deal is if Miller is gone for the season and they're not confident in Lack/Markstrom as their starter while they push for the playoffs. Edited February 23, 2015 by Tank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabresBillsFan Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 RoR for grigorenko + mcCabe + 1st round pick. I wouldn't move McCabe at all just yet. He's going to be pretty solid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Just going to retract what I said. Vancouver trading for Neuvirth doesn't make sense unless a few things are in play... If they're trading for Neuvirth it's because Miller is gone for the season. They already have Lack and Markstrom behind Miller. If Miller is out short-term they're not going to call up Markstrom because they'll have to waive Lack/Markstrom to send them down when Miller gets back. If Miller is out long-term then they could just call up Markstrom for the rest of the season and be safe... The only way they make a Neuvirth deal is if Miller is gone for the season and they're not confident in Lack/Markstrom as their starter while they push for the playoffs.Trade dealine is in, what, 1-1/2 weeks? Only roster limit after the trade deadline is cap space. If 'Nucks don't have extremely tight cap, no need (from the NHL perspective, AHL perspective - they'd want him back) to send the goalie back down. Plus, a callup MIGHT fit under emergency rules (haven't looked at it in a looong time) which would also negate waiver requirement upon sending goalie back down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 (edited) Just going to retract what I said. Vancouver trading for Neuvirth doesn't make sense unless a few things are in play... If they're trading for Neuvirth it's because Miller is gone for the season. They already have Lack and Markstrom behind Miller. If Miller is out short-term they're not going to call up Markstrom because they'll have to waive Lack/Markstrom to send them down when Miller gets back. If Miller is out long-term then they could just call up Markstrom for the rest of the season and be safe... The only way they make a Neuvirth deal is if Miller is gone for the season and they're not confident in Lack/Markstrom as their starter while they push for the playoffs. They do have a window short term to call up Markstrom actually. He has to be dressed in 10 games before he would have to clear waivers again to be returned to the AHL. Then there's also the emergency recall they can use to avoid waivers. Remember a few years back when Scott Clemmensieve played most of the season for the Devils and then didn't have to be waived to return to the minors? edit: Ah, Taro beat me to it. Edited February 23, 2015 by shrader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 I wouldn't move McCabe at all just yet. He's going to be pretty solid. He's absolutely on the table if a top 6 forward is the return Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Leafs shopping Lupul http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/report-maple-leafs-shopping-joffrey-lupul/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted February 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Yea after I slept on it I realized that the Canucks can just bring up Markstrom in the short term... Doubtful they make a move for Neuvirth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted February 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Markstrom recalled by the Canucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 (edited) TM just said he has not spoken to the Avs in quite sometime re ROR. States he would probably take a chance on a player like ROR for a late first and prospect GMTM if you acquire a player with term left and give up a lot hopefully you have read him right about his desire to stay in Buffalo No calls on Neuvirth from other teams. Will approach him on re-signing if he is still here after trade deadline Not receiving many calls on UFAs Not expecting another hockey trade at the deadline GMTM also stated he may have to make some calls himself And most importantly GMTM used the term McEichel Edited February 23, 2015 by BRAWNDO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 But I want ROR :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 I wouldn't move McCabe at all just yet. He's going to be pretty solid. I like pysyk and McCabe to, but if it gets us RoR its adios amigo. But seems murray doesn't want to pay what colorado wants anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 This is fun, this Russian game. I am not allowed to change my screen name for about 35 more days so I cannot change it to одиннадцать. But I would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 And most importantly GMTM used the term McEichel Bahahaha! This is fun, this Russian game. I am not allowed to change my screen name for about 35 more days so I cannot change it to одиннадцать. But I would. What are the terms? I asked elsewhere, but can't recall where and therefore can't look into whether someone answered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 Bahahaha! What are the terms? I asked elsewhere, but can't recall where and therefore can't look into whether someone answered. 2 name changes in ninety days. Back to trade speculation. I don't want to see anything bad happen to Ryan Miller, but would it be horrible if Vancouver suddenly needed another goalie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 2 name changes in ninety days. Back to trade speculation. I don't want to see anything bad happen to Ryan Miller, but would it be horrible if Vancouver suddenly needed another goalie? No i want lindback as our new tankcommander :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted February 23, 2015 Report Share Posted February 23, 2015 2 name changes in ninety days. Thanks. I'm going to need more guidance than that, I think. :bag: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.