Jump to content

GDT: Buffalo at Montreal 3-25-14 at 7:30 PM EDT


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

I only caught the last two; the bright spots:

 

1. Hodgson. Nice moves tonight, even though there wasn't a goal at the end of them. Smooth play all game.

 

2. Hackett. The fact that he took a shutout as long as he did was, in itself, amazing. Yeah, the first goal, and all that. But he did play a nice game. And that means that if one of Enroth/Neuvirth can emerge as a legit no. 1, and if Hackett remains solid, there's a trade to be made.

 

3. Foligno. How much abuse did he take in the corner while freezing the puck for :20 of the last :45 of that four minute power play? Nice job, my man. Nice job.

 

I effin hate that idiotic Ole song

 

I think it's obsolete even in Europe. I think it's only the Habs now. So wait about twenty years, and it will be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hacket was awesome.

 

But we really need some FAs this summer to improve.

 

Yeah I know we are tanking, but we are currently not a team, which is worthy to play in the NHL.

 

I would like to see some nice Buffalo hockey, not the endless tank parade we are seeing now and the next games until end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only caught the last two; the bright spots:

 

1. Hodgson. Nice moves tonight, even though there wasn't a goal at the end of them. Smooth play all game.

 

Hodgson's taken a lot of flack lately (I given a lot myself), but last night he looked like the kind of player he can be, not just because of the one play, but he was carrying the puck, something he abandoned doing for the last month or more and it was good to see. Maybe something Nolan said to him struck a chord and he starts playing like he's capable of. I do hope that it isn't just a 1 or 2 game thing though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PK Subban takes his hand off of his stick to play the man more than any other player I can think of. I just don't know how he doesn't get called for holding more than he does.

 

Yes, that is the only thing I took away from that game.

 

 

 

Remember a couple of weeks ago when we had 800+ people on here.

 

This sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and pretty soon we're gonna clinch last place. We're 11 points behind Edmonton with 10 games left to play. Sabres would have to average 1.1 points earned per game just to tie, and Edmonton not make a point in their remaining games. In the last 12 games the Sabres have earned a whopping 4 points, or 0.3 points per game on average. If we stay true to average, we'll earn 3 or 4 more points in the remainder of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and pretty soon we're gonna clinch last place. We're 11 points behind Edmonton with 10 games left to play. Sabres would have to average 1.1 points earned per game just to tie, and Edmonton not make a point in their remaining games. In the last 12 games the Sabres have earned a whopping 4 points, or 0.3 points per game on average. If we stay true to average, we'll earn 3 or 4 more points in the remainder of the season.

 

This season can't end soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season can't end soon enough.

 

Next season will be much better to see some of the future on the ice but as far as the record, I would get used to the point total you see right now. It is going to SUCK sending off that burning pile of dollar bills to pay for seasons again........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next season will be much better to see some of the future on the ice but as far as the record, I would get used to the point total you see right now. It is going to SUCK sending off that burning pile of dollar bills to pay for seasons again........

 

Oh, I'm not expecting much, if anything, to change next year.

 

At least the heroics runs to 9th spot have come to an end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least the heroics runs to 9th spot have come to an end.

 

Seriously. The strive to mediocrity just to be ousted in the first round was the definition of false hope. But this crash and burn is really hard to take because there's no guarantee we'll ever get out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously. The strive to mediocrity just to be ousted in the first round was the definition of false hope. But this crash and burn is really hard to take because there's no guarantee we'll ever get out of it.

 

Exactly. But there are no guarantees to anything in life except...yada yada. Taking everything else out of the equation, I'm ok with the crash and burn or tank approach for no other reason than it's a shift from the false hope / mediocrity approach. Yes, there's a risk that we become Edmonton or the Islanders, but I'm willing to take that risk for a shot at becoming the Pens or Blackhawks, especially since the long term suckitude of a team like the Oilers to me is not really different than the long term sub-mediocrity that has defined the Sabres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take the "False Hope/mediocrity approach" any day over the cluster###### tire fire that we see out there now

 

Atleast there was entertaining games being played in a run to try and make the playoffs and just as much of a chance that they could get hot and have some things fall in their favour in the playoffs as there is a chance that this team will suddenly become a "Dynasty" franchise because they sucked BAD for a couple of years.

 

If its so easy to go from no talent to cup contender compared to middle of the pact and getting better, why doesn't every team do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take the "False Hope/mediocrity approach" any day over the cluster###### tire fire that we see out there now

 

Atleast there was entertaining games being played in a run to try and make the playoffs and just as much of a chance that they could get hot and have some things fall in their favour in the playoffs as there is a chance that this team will suddenly become a "Dynasty" franchise because they sucked BAD for a couple of years.

 

If its so easy to go from no talent to cup contender compared to middle of the pact and getting better, why doesn't every team do it?

 

TBH, I feel pretty convinced the current front office are wishing Regier hadn't declared "tank on" last season, but they're most likely smart enough to try and make the best of it, now that the tank is in effect.

 

I'm willing to bet good money that if Pegula had used his brains and fired Darcy and Lindy two years ago, no way we're in tank mode today.

 

The only reason Darcy embraced the tank in the first place, was that he wasn't able to attract quality free agents, largely due to the reputation of the franchise.

 

In no small part, that reputation was based on the actions of the front office, and the owner who kept said front office around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FA's don't want to sign here for one main reason:

 

The city of Buffalo and all the stereotypes and stigmas that go with it, however misguided they may be.

 

Struggling to ever ice a legit cup contender certainly contributes, but even when/if the Sabres manage to be among the elite teams in the league the recruiting problem will remain as compared to other top markets who also are competitive.

 

The recruiting problem is very real, and will only ever abate to the extent that winning hockey allows, but it will always be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH, I feel pretty convinced the current front office are wishing Regier hadn't declared "tank on" last season, but they're most likely smart enough to try and make the best of it, now that the tank is in effect.

 

I'm willing to bet good money that if Pegula had used his brains and fired Darcy and Lindy two years ago, no way we're in tank mode today.

 

The only reason Darcy embraced the tank in the first place, was that he wasn't able to attract quality free agents, largely due to the reputation of the franchise.

 

In no small part, that reputation was based on the actions of the front office, and the owner who kept said front office around.

Well, a good GM would have been able to take what the Sabres currently had and turned this team around much quicker then Darcys plan to gut the franchise and start from sub-rock bottom.......

He left them in a bad spot by starting the gut, which led to making it necessary to get rid of guys like Miller and Vanek before they walked for nothing cause they didn't want anything to do with a long gut rebuild

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...