LastPommerFan Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 After Foligno's hit last, Gunnarsson had a separated shoulder Done for the year. He WAS trying to hit his head, he was just trying to go THROUGH his body to get there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chileanseabass Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 As for that video, I really don't even care too much about the crease battle. The best part is the whole interaction on the faceoff. Komisarek and the other Leaf player (too lazy to figure out who it was) were constantly trying to make Foligno flinch and he never moved. Komisarek looked like an 8 year old bully trying to scare a kid with fake punches. Big bad Clarke McArthur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 If we didn't score, it should have been a 5 on 3. 2 for interference/roughing on Foligno and 2 for holding Leopold's stick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottnc Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 A shootout counts as a win for the purpose of adding 2 points to the victor. It makes some sense that they would exclude it from the tiebreaker since that's not how playoff games are decided. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing head-to-head as the first tiebreaker. Of course, I say that knowing we own that one over Washington. I still say the 3 point regulation win is the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 never..give...up...hope Loved seeing these reading the day after. :) Went with Yard's Brawler Pugilist Style Ale last night after watching the first few minutes. :) http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/450/46504 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Ahhh yes, that video reminds me of how awful that interference call was. Bozak played the puck! Indeed. That should not have been a penalty. Foligno really was a beast last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaFontaineToMogilny Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 The two assists by Vanek last night sends him past Mogilny and into 11th on the Sabres all time scorers list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dEnnis the Menace Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 The two assists by Vanek last night sends him past Mogilny and into 11th on the Sabres all time scorers list That's a cool fun fact! I had to look up the list to see who the top ten were! He's 7th in Goal scoring, with 230 Goals (8th place is Miro with 224 and 6th is Mike Foligno with 247), and he's only 11 points away from passing Miro for 10th on the scoring list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 The two assists by Vanek last night sends him past Mogilny and into 11th on the Sabres all time scorers list That's a cool fun fact! I had to look up the list to see who the top ten were! He's 7th in Goal scoring, with 230 Goals (8th place is Miro with 224 and 6th is Mike Foligno with 247), and he's only 11 points away from passing Miro for 10th on the scoring list. By this point next year, he should be the Sabres' 5th all-time goal scorer (assuming he's still here and healthy). Pretty impressive. I can't stop watching the replay of the game-tying goal from last night. The amount of abuse Foligno takes is a little tough to watch. He bangs his head on the ice pretty hard about 40 seconds in. I hope he's OK. Of course, the best part of the video is Foligno celebrating *at* Komisarek 55 seconds in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastPommerFan Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 By this point next year, he should be the Sabres' 5th all-time goal scorer (assuming he's still here and healthy). Pretty impressive. I can't stop watching the replay of the game-tying goal from last night. The amount of abuse Foligno takes is a little tough to watch. He bangs his head on the ice pretty hard about 40 seconds in. I hope he's OK. Of course, the best part of the video is Foligno celebrating *at* Komisarek 55 seconds in. I'm sure the ice will be fine, they'll have till next weekend to get it ready for game 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I love the "give Komisarek a little cross check... oh wait, we scored!" move from Ennis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dEnnis the Menace Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I'm sure the ice will be fine, they'll have till next weekend to get it ready for game 3. :w00t: well played sir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I hate cats. cats hate you..try and stay out of the tiger cage when at the zoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 cats hate you..try and stay out of the tiger cage when at the zoo LOL... Got a genuine chuckle out of that one.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Has Brian Burke held his presser about the sad state of officiating yet in regards to the Sabres tying goal ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Has Brian Burke held his presser about the sad state of officiating yet in regards to the Sabres tying goal ? He's afraid if he does it might bring attention to the fact that Komisarek was using Foligno's head as a medicine ball for 1 armed squat thrusts for about 10 seconds, so he's still debating whether to hold it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChimp Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 He's afraid if he does it might bring attention to the fact that Komisarek was using Foligno's head as a medicine ball for 1 armed squat thrusts for about 10 seconds, so he's still debating whether to hold it. And besides, the replay is quite clear. The goalie was searching for the puck under his teammate right in front of him. Neck all craned and trying to look over the dude's back and then under him, making it blatantly obvious that he didn't have the puck covered. For once, the referee's angle was the best in the house, too. Keep your eyes on his eyes. He's watching the puck the whole time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assquatch Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Anyone read any comments from Komisarek after the game? Or know which Toronto radio station might have audio of an interview he might have given? I'd love to hear/read what he had to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofiba Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 And besides, the replay is quite clear. The goalie was searching for the puck under his teammate right in front of him. Neck all craned and trying to look over the dude's back and then under him, making it blatantly obvious that he didn't have the puck covered. For once, the referee's angle was the best in the house, too. Keep your eyes on his eyes. He's watching the puck the whole time. The goalie searching is a great point. It's obvious from that the he didn't have the punk, but there's no way you'll convince me the ref saw the puck the whole time. Watch him when the goal is actually scored. He's about the 5th person to realize it's in the net. I would think a guy watching the puck would be the first to know when it's in the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 And besides, the replay is quite clear. The goalie was searching for the puck under his teammate right in front of him. Neck all craned and trying to look over the dude's back and then under him, making it blatantly obvious that he didn't have the puck covered. For once, the referee's angle was the best in the house, too. Keep your eyes on his eyes. He's watching the puck the whole time. The goalie searching is a great point. It's obvious from that the he didn't have the punk, but there's no way you'll convince me the ref saw the puck the whole time. Watch him when the goal is actually scored. He's about the 5th person to realize it's in the net. I would think a guy watching the puck would be the first to know when it's in the net. I thought I heard Miller mention in his post-game interview that if that play were in his crease he would've faked that he had the puck covered. Or something like that. The way he said it suggested to me that it may be a common ploy for goalies to fake they've covered the puck when they can't find it in a crease scrum. Had the Toronto goalie faked that he had it covered, if there was any question in the ref's mind there likely would have been a whistle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Swannie_House Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Obviously, Toronto is short on COWBELL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 hehehe :w00t: My favorite part of Komisarek grinding Foligno's head into the ice was what Foligno did after the goal... pushed Komi off stood up and raised his hands to the sky! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9tUF3NkZ4Y But was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FolignosJock Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Anyone hear on WGR this morning why they were talking about how one of the goals shouldnt have counted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Hey Eleven, I had to do some reading for work and walked away. Loved the result. Thanks for the suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadCap Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 Anyone hear on WGR this morning why they were talking about how one of the goals shouldnt have counted? There is an article on TSN.ca about it. You cannot push the goalie into the net after a save, which is exactly what happened with the 4th goal by Sulzer. Apparently, the ref did not see Sulzer push the Scriven's pad into the net, he only saw the puck come out of the net. The replay can only determine if the puck crossed the line, they cannot inform the guys on the ice if it was a "good goal", that is decided on ice at the time of the apparent goal. It appears they messed up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.