shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I agree 100%. It's 4th down and 10 or whatever, you're down by 20 whatever points, there are only a few minutes left and you scramble out of bounds for 2 yards? Just take 3 steps and throw it up for grabs - what does it matter? He needed to preserve his stats? Yeah, I couldn't even finish that one without laughing uncontrollably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 He needed to preserve his stats? Yeah, I couldn't even finish that one without laughing uncontrollably. What was his rating? 30 something? One more INT wouldn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 What was his rating? 30 something? One more INT wouldn't matter. I'm still wondering if he made it to triple digit passing. I gave up after the 3rd quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I'm still wondering if he made it to triple digit passing. I gave up after the 3rd quarter. Think he ended up with 102 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 The 2 ints weren't his fault though - so he should have ended up with 120 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 The 2 ints weren't his fault though - so he should have ended up with 120 yards. And the PI against Evans would have been a TD. But still, his play is absolutely disgusting and I can't stomach it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 The 2 ints weren't his fault though - so he should have ended up with 120 yards. The INTs weren't his fault, but both of those passes were really stupid decisions. Johnson was still 5 yards shy of the first down with two defenders near him with, other receivers open. Parrish was 2 yards behind the LOS and there is no way Trent didn't see the defender right on him. He should have never thrown it. Trent sucks real bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 The INTs weren't his fault, but both of those passes were really stupid decisions. Johnson was still 5 yards shy of the first down with two defenders near him with, other receivers open. Parrish was 2 yards behind the LOS and there is no way Trent didn't see the defender right on him. He should have never thrown it. Trent sucks real bad. I'd like to know exactly what kind of miscommunication happened on that first pick because Johnson clearly was stopping his route right as Trent started to throw the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I'd like to know exactly what kind of miscommunication happened on that first pick because Johnson clearly was stopping his route right as Trent started to throw the ball. It would be nice to know if Johnson was supposed to stop or if he was supposed to continue his run. The blame would change I think if he was supposed to stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 The INTs weren't his fault, but both of those passes were really stupid decisions. Johnson was still 5 yards shy of the first down with two defenders near him with, other receivers open. Parrish was 2 yards behind the LOS and there is no way Trent didn't see the defender right on him. He should have never thrown it. Trent sucks real bad. It would be nice if some plays were called where the receivers were 2-3 yards past the first down marker and then could come back a few yards to make the catch if needed - like every other team in the league does. On the Parrish note - maybe Trent didn't see the defender! Maybe he needs glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 It would be nice if some plays were called where the receivers were 2-3 yards past the first down marker and then could come back a few yards to make the catch if needed - like every other team in the league does. On the Parrish note - maybe Trent didn't see the defender! Maybe he needs glasses. Maybe his eyes are slightly misalligned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpandean Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 If they go 0-3 and there is no sign of improvement, then I would like to see Brohm get a shot. It might not be fair to Fitzpatrick, but he's had more opportunities to show what he can do as a starter and hasn't demonstrated that he can be more than a serviceable backup. The only problem that I'd see with Brohm is that he's a stand-in-the-pocket quarterback and the Bills can't maintain a pocket. If they want to go with two tight ends that switch between blocking and running short routes, while the receivers focus on mid to long routes, then maybe it would work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling Archer Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Wishbone formation with a TE and Evans split out. That way Trent never has to throw more than 5 or 10 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Maybe his eyes are slightly misalligned. Doesn't matter now. Fitz is starting on Sunday per WGR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Edwards is benched and Fitzpatrick will be starting next game per WGR and Bills. I'd guess Edwards will still be the backup. I'd rather Brohm got the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Doesn't matter now. Fitz is starting on Sunday per WGR. oh - beat me to it. Guess I shouldn't have added the two extra lines of comment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I hung in there until 27-7.. I then bailed to a real game... They are unwatchable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 oh - beat me to it. Guess I shouldn't have added the two extra lines of comment! My first scoop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I hung in there until 27-7.. I then bailed to a real game... They are unwatchable. +1. I'd also add that they are completely irrelevant. As an organization, they have stopped trying. What did they think was going to happen with that offensive line? I still want them to win but I have no expectation of doing so and no desire to go out of my way to watch any more of their games. I'll consider paying for the Sunday ticket again once they demonstrate that they want to win -- which means more than just hiring retreads and drafting running backs in the 1st round. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Those teenagers at camp got to him eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Edwards is benched and Fitzpatrick will be starting next game per WGR and Bills. I'd guess Edwards will still be the backup. I'd rather Brohm got the start. I'm definitely in the "why not give Brohm his shot" camp, but I can live with this one. I walked out of that bar yesterday telling myself that I won't watch another Edwards start and I got my wish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I'm definitely in the "why not give Brohm his shot" camp, but I can live with this one. I walked out of that bar yesterday telling myself that I won't watch another Edwards start and I got my wish. Edwards is still the #2 though so you'll still get to see him on the sidelines. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Why don't they just do the wildcat the entire game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Edwards is still the #2 though so you'll still get to see him on the sidelines. :( Even worse, the haircut will be on display for all to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Even worse, the haircut will be on display for all to see. What? You don't like them sideburns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.