Brawndo Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 (edited) Edited February 29 by Brawndo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted February 29 Author Report Share Posted February 29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalonill Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 Buffalo 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carmel Corn Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Buffalonill said: Buffalo Just one issue with your gif....the tumbleweeds are moving which might suggest some sort of activity. Unfortunately, we know that GMKA is doing absolutely nothing. No way anything is moving that fast in his world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Brawndo said: Don't know enough about the prospect to make a comment on him Actually its a 3-way trade '24 2nd, Artem Grushnikov and the Conditional '26 3rd (transfers if Dallas makes the Playoffs) goes to CGY NJD retained 50% of the remaining 50% of Tanev's contract and got a '26 4th from DAL for the trouble DAL got Tanev at 25% and some guy named Cole Brady 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
French Collection Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 7 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: NJD retained 50% of the remaining 50% of Tanev's contract and got a '26 4th from DAL for the trouble This happens on so many deals, it amazes me how KA loves draft picks and stocking prospects yet never brokers a deal for picks. TP should drill another well just for this purpose. Cap space for picks, no brainer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, French Collection said: This happens on so many deals, it amazes me how KA loves draft picks and stocking prospects yet never brokers a deal for picks. TP should drill another well just for this purpose. Cap space for picks, no brainer. Maybe the math is too hard for him or TP has a mandate that he is only going to pay players who actually play for his organization. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 I personally am interested to see what happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoPuckYourself Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 Will goalies Jacob Markstrom or John Gibson finally be traded? It seems like they've been on the rumor mill for the past 4 seasons at least. Is Saros still available? Seems unlikely now that the Preds are in playoff contention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 3 hours ago, French Collection said: This happens on so many deals, it amazes me how KA loves draft picks and stocking prospects yet never brokers a deal for picks. TP should drill another well just for this purpose. Cap space for picks, no brainer. We are in perfect position to do this, or take a veteran for free plus that somebody needs to jettison to create space but we are CHEAP. POnly serious teams spend their money. 1 hour ago, GoPuckYourself said: Will goalies Jacob Markstrom or John Gibson finally be traded? It seems like they've been on the rumor mill for the past 4 seasons at least. Is Saros still available? Seems unlikely now that the Preds are in playoff contention. Saros is unlikely according to Trotts. Unless he's lying to up the bids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFinn Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, GoPuckYourself said: Will goalies Jacob Markstrom or John Gibson finally be traded? It seems like they've been on the rumor mill for the past 4 seasons at least. Is Saros still available? Seems unlikely now that the Preds are in playoff contention. Devils is the team in most need of a goalie but if they took on some of Tanevs salary, does that mean they changed to sell mode? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Lee Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 4 hours ago, SabreFinn said: Devils is the team in most need of a goalie but if they took on some of Tanevs salary, does that mean they changed to sell mode? I was wondering the same. Per CapFriendly though, with Dougie Hamilton on LTIR, they still have around 8 million in deadline space. We have 35 million in deadline space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 Is (Non Sabres) really necessary? 1 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 54 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: Is (Non Sabres) really necessary? Sure. We are likely to see each of Girgensons, Okposo, Olofsson, and Erik Johnson traded for late picks which we can then use to, uh, um, (trying to type "as trade chips" but never getting there) on high character, high motor projects who probably end up in Europe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 13 hours ago, French Collection said: This happens on so many deals, it amazes me how KA loves draft picks and stocking prospects yet never brokers a deal for picks. TP should drill another well just for this purpose. Cap space for picks, no brainer. As much as I wish to agree with you, we may need all 3 retention slots for our own player trades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 3 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: As much as I wish to agree with you, we may need all 3 retention slots for our own player trades. We have potentially 4 players who could use retention.ll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
French Collection Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, thewookie1 said: As much as I wish to agree with you, we may need all 3 retention slots for our own player trades. I guess that is possible. He could turn VO for a 5th into a 3rd by retaining 50%. I just don’t like that he hasn’t used this tool since he started. The retention slots have been blank for 4 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoPuckYourself Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 15 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Saros is unlikely according to Trotts. Unless he's lying to up the bids. Yeah that's what I heard also but you never know. 15 hours ago, SabreFinn said: Devils is the team in most need of a goalie but if they took on some of Tanevs salary, does that mean they changed to sell mode? Mercer has been talked about as a player they could move on from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted March 1 Author Report Share Posted March 1 From LeBrun As for Calgary, a dozen teams had shown interest in Tanev over the past two months, including some non-contenders like the Ottawa Senators (seeking Tanev’s leadership) and Buffalo Sabres, both of which would have wanted to extend him as part of a trade. But Tanev had some measure of control over things with his modified no-trade clause, and in the end, Dallas was a destination that was alluring to Tanev — where he can go chase the Stanley Cup. 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted March 1 Author Report Share Posted March 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 2 hours ago, Brawndo said: From LeBrun As for Calgary, a dozen teams had shown interest in Tanev over the past two months, including some non-contenders like the Ottawa Senators (seeking Tanev’s leadership) and Buffalo Sabres, both of which would have wanted to extend him as part of a trade. But Tanev had some measure of control over things with his modified no-trade clause, and in the end, Dallas was a destination that was alluring to Tanev — where he can go chase the Stanley Cup. This makes sense. There is a reality that we will never get a veteran who still wants to chase a cup. We can only woo guys who are young enough that they can be convinced this team can build to that, or old guys who have already won one or more and just want a payday. Or I guess guys who don't care about winning but I'd think we don't want them anyway. Or at least we shouldn't want them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted March 1 Author Report Share Posted March 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted March 1 Author Report Share Posted March 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 8 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Well at very least this wasn't another Scandella situation. We got a '25 4th for full price Bush Anaheim gets a 3rd for a 50% off Bush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 (edited) They can go up to 75% now? edit: Ah, one takes 50% and then the next takes 50% of what remains. Edited March 1 by shrader 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.