WildCard Posted April 12, 2017 Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 So Murray promised Eichel this team will get better; that we will be a playoff team and a contender. Does that mean immediate changes? If so, where? Anyone else find it interesting that he had to promise Jack specifically that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted April 12, 2017 Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 So Murray promised Eichel this team will get better; that we will be a playoff team and a contender. Does that mean immediate changes? If so, where? Anyone else find it interesting that he had to promise Jack specifically that? Again, like my LeBron example in the press conference thread, Eichel is the type of player you need to prioritize keeping happy as that skill is impossible to replace. Tossing out a coach for another decent coach to appease your superstar player is far more preferable to losing your star in FA because he was displeased. The first is commonplace in sports (but kind of ), the second gets you immediately fired as GM and blacklisted from ever working again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 Basketball is a lot different though. That's a sport specifically designed where the coach is only there to manage egos and locker rooms. Hockey, not so much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted April 12, 2017 Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 I was pleased with the mix of "grow up, players" and "I'm doing what I can to keep Jack here forever" I heard in the PC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted April 12, 2017 Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 Basketball is a lot different though. That's a sport specifically designed where the coach is only there to manage egos and locker rooms. Hockey, not so much I readily admit that basketball is different - the size of the team (only having ~10 players that play) means having top end talent is that much more important, especially when your star can play 80% of the teams minutes. I do think the example is comparable in that the difference between an engaged, motivated, happy Eichel and a pissed off one who looks disinterested makes a huge difference in team morale and wins/losses at the end of the year. I really think there are only a handful of impact coaches in the league and then all the others fall into two buckets - decent (neutral win impact) and bad (negative win impact). Most of the NHL coaches are in the neutral category, with varying flavors of systems they all would get the same wins from equal talent. I don't mind swapping neutral coaches to appease a star player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabills Posted April 12, 2017 Report Share Posted April 12, 2017 Basketball is a lot different though. That's a sport specifically designed where the coach is only there to manage egos and locker rooms. Hockey, not so much I don't claim to know that much about basketball (hell, I don't know that much about hockey), but I think this idea that NBA coaches are just babysitters is in accurate. Look at the difference between the way Golden State plays versus the San Antonio Spurs. Sure, that's partially who you have on the team (Tim Duncan and Steph Curry might actually be from different planets), but just like any sport, coming up with how to effectively use those players is very important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 So Murray promised Eichel this team will get better; that we will be a playoff team and a contender. Does that mean immediate changes? If so, where? Anyone else find it interesting that he had to promise Jack specifically that? I posted in the trade speculation thread I expect a big, and extremely controversial, move for a defenseman. And you're totally wrong about basketball coaches :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 I posted in the trade speculation thread I expect a big, and extremely controversial, move for a defenseman. And you're totally wrong about basketball coaches :p True I hope you're right. Although our bait is few... I'll be sad if it's Sam. GMTM must cut the dead weight... Moulson, bogo, Franson have to go. I'll give Kuli one more year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Does anybody here honestly think this is GMTM's finished product? It's obvious to us and obvious to him what changes need to be made (defense, high energy/defensively aware bottom 6). He mentioned the shots against is a problem, as well as the PK. He knows, we know. I'm confident he'll make the necessary changes... but I'm not expecting everything to be fixed this offseason, it will probably take another offseason to purge the dead weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsixspd Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Tim never promised Eichel a rose garden though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 True I hope you're right. Although our bait is few... I'll be sad if it's Sam. GMTM must cut the dead weight... Moulson, bogo, Franson have to go. I'll give Kuli one more year. Kulikov's contract is up and I think Murray doesn't want Sam around anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Kulikov's contract is up and I think Murray doesn't want Sam around anymore. Last time someone was benched/suspended for being late to a meeting they were shipped out that summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Last time someone was benched/suspended for being late to a meeting they were shipped out that summer. Kane in Toronto, or was there a more recent one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Kane in Toronto, or was there a more recent one? I was thinking Zadorov. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 I thought Sam made an honest mistake, maybe there is more to the story. It's a shame if he does get shipped out IMO anyway. Does anyone know if Jack and Sam had a falling out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 I thought Sam made an honest mistake, maybe there is more to the story. It's a shame if he does get shipped out IMO anyway. Does anyone know if Jack and Sam had a falling out? Just the usual fighting over the remote kind of stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAud Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Tim never promised Eichel a rose garden though. I beg your pardon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 The NHL Network had a feature where Brian Lawton was talking about the state of the game and the impact of younger players. He said it's different times around the league now, players have more influence and are being asked their input on all things nowadays. He said without saying who that some coaches have been relieved of duties based on players concerns. This sounds like it falls in line with that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted April 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 The NHL Network had a feature where Brian Lawton was talking about the state of the game and the impact of younger players. He said it's different times around the league now, players have more influence and are being asked their input on all things nowadays. He said without saying who that some coaches have been relieved of duties based on players concerns. This sounds like it falls in line with that statement. And that would be Byslma in Pittsburgh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 The NHL Network had a feature where Brian Lawton was talking about the state of the game and the impact of younger players. He said it's different times around the league now, players have more influence and are being asked their input on all things nowadays. He said without saying who that some coaches have been relieved of duties based on players concerns. This sounds like it falls in line with that statement. This is what happens when "Participation Trophies" get handed out at a young age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 This is what happens when "Participation Trophies" get handed out at a young age. Nah. It's what happens when coaches don't change with the game. Kids are a lot better trained and smarter about systems and whatnot than they ever used to be. Gone are the days when the coach was a dictator. There's a lot more collaboration going on now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josie Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 This is what happens when "Participation Trophies" get handed out at a young age. Was I the only kid/millennial who felt extreme shame when given one of those? Everyone I knew who got a participation trophy/ribbon would hide/throw it away because it was concrete evidence you DIDN'T win. Like this awful, pitying reminder that you sucked/failed. No one ever congratulated you for getting the equivalent of this: Never gave anyone I knew this inflated sense of self worth. Always felt like a strawman for a generational "darn kids these days". Sorry, 2 cents derailment there, continue on haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 Nah. It's what happens when coaches don't change with the game. Kids are a lot better trained and smarter about systems and whatnot than they ever used to be. Gone are the days when the coach was a dictator. There's a lot more collaboration going on now.that and the young players are being counted on in today's game like never before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 This is what happens when "Participation Trophies" get handed out at a young age.You too, Chz?The participation trophy thing has always been . Just an expression of crusty old people digging in their heels and resisting progress. Much in the same way that social security is a right, while healthcare is an "entitlement." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted April 13, 2017 Report Share Posted April 13, 2017 that and the young players are being counted on in today's game like never before Yup. The game has changed. Kids are working their nuts off like never before, and at lower and lower levels of the sport. If people want to bandy around the "participation trophy" rhetoric then all I gotta say to that is: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.