PASabreFan Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Yes _____ No _____ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 wut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Da funk you talkin bout? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Hey PA, have you stopped beating your wife yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Hey PA, have you stopped beating your wife yet?What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) Is that a superfluous "when" and "first?" Edited March 13, 2017 by SwampD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woods-racer Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Hey PA, have you stopped beating your wife yet? What? It's a trick question that has no right answer and any answer given can be used against you. You youngins are more familiar with the term *troll* or *trolling*. Same basic principle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 It's a trick question that has no right answer and any answer given can be used against you. You youngins are more familiar with the term *troll* or *trolling*. Same basic principle. Which is what the original question was: trolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 I am curious as to whether this too will be claimed not to constitute trolling. It fortunately isn't a high percentage of PA's posts, but like herpes, there is an outbreak every so often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 When he skates out on the ice in a Patriots jersey after pissing on Rick Jeanneret's widow? It's going to take a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 I'm no English language wizard, but it appears that the question can't be answered with a simple yes, or no. Therefore, the only reasonable thing to do, PA, is to delete this thread immediately and it's like it never happened. OK? OK!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 I am curious as to whether this too will be claimed not to constitute trolling. It fortunately isn't a high percentage of PA's posts, but like herpes, there is an outbreak every so often. Ah, c'mon. This is a bit of fun. It's a transparent attempt at a nose tweak, of sorts. I chuckled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Which is what the original question was: trolling. You've biked too many miles on your brain. I'd suggest giving it some breathing room. Since when is a domestic violence accusation appropriate as a joke or snappy comeback on a hockey message board? I am curious as to whether this too will be claimed not to constitute trolling. It fortunately isn't a high percentage of PA's posts, but like herpes, there is an outbreak every so often. More top-notch moderating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKnowPhysics Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by PASabreFan. View it anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by PASabreFan. View it anyway? That blew my mind! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKnowPhysics Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Been like that for years, man. I only put up with you when I consciously and deliberately opt into your nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Been like that for years, man. I only put up with you when I consciously and deliberately opt into your nonsense. Outstanding. Glad you're ignoring me. And definitely not reading Sullivan or Gleason. I still like your avatar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoPre Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Only way that would ever happen is if Eichel chose to leave Buffalo the day he becomes a UFA. His return would be an ugly one. Eichel will not leave Buffalo. The Sabres are coming together. Murray and company are showing they are trying to build a contender. So can't believe I even wasted 2 seconds of my life thinking about it. And man, another 30 for typing this post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Since when is a domestic violence accusation appropriate as a joke or snappy comeback on a hockey message board? It was the logical equivalent of your original post. You're trolling for a fight. That blew my mind! Why? I've did the same during your last herpes outbreak. You're a decent enough fellow until you've had it with the team and you fly off the rails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoPre Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 It was the logical equivalent of your original post. You're trolling for a fight. And I think he has suckered you into one... ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) It was the logical equivalent of your original post. You're trolling for a fight. It's also used in law schools around the country as an example of a question so objectionable that the attorney asking it might be subject to discipline. (Albeit in a different form: "Mr. Smith, when did you stop beating your wife?") I got where you were going. It wasn't a joke about domestic violence. Edited March 13, 2017 by Eleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 And I think he has suckered you into one... ;) He'll find taking me on is like wrestling with a pig: We both get muddy, but I enjoy it. I got where you were going. It wasn't a joke about domestic violence. It's cliche. Of course it wasn't about domestic violence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 I am curious as to whether this too will be claimed not to constitute trolling. It fortunately isn't a high percentage of PA's posts, but like herpes, there is an outbreak every so often. Anybody have some PAltrex? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 It was the logical equivalent of your original post. You're trolling for a fight. The logical equivalent? Please explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.