z-man Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Why is Babcock considered to be such a great coach? He won one cup with a good team. So did many others (including Bylsma, Torts, and others who were available last offseason). The wings still have the second best record in the NHL without him. The Leafs suck even worse with him. I don't get why he keeps getting cited for the Olympic Gold...I could coach the Canadians to a gold while blind drunk. Maybe I'm just saying this because he's arrogant, but I'm just not seeing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Why is Babcock considered to be such a great coach? He won one cup with a good team. So did many others (including Bylsma, Torts, and others who were available last offseason). The wings still have the second best record in the NHL without him. The Leafs suck even worse with him. I don't get why he keeps getting cited for the Olympic Gold...I could coach the Canadians to a gold while blind drunk. Maybe I'm just saying this because he's arrogant, but I'm just not seeing it. The Wings made the playoffs every single year he was there. They were a very consistent team, that is part of it. Someone else with more knowledge than me would have to answer the rest. I agree with you though. I think Bylsma can be just as effective as Babcock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 The Canadian media (mostly Toronto) have been talking about how his coaching is so good that he has the Leafs overachieving right now I never understood the hype even when the Sabres were pushing for him, his cup win came with Detroit at theirs of their prime. Since then they seem to be getting slowly worse each year (yet still a playoff team). If you listen to his former players, seems like none were sad to see him go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Crotch Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Bylsma has the same number of cups (one) and has a higher all-time winning percentage than Babcock. Each had great players, etc., etc., etc., but I'm not sure we "lost" by getting Bylsma instead of Babcock. Speaking of Babcock, I'll see him tonight. Will be at the Preds - Leafs game. Go Preds! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Also Byslma should probably have 2 cup rings. Marc Andre Fleury is a nightmare in the playoffs. These are MAF sv% from the cup win through Bylsma's firing: 09-10: .891% 10-11: .899% 11-12: .834% 12-13: .883% 13-14: .915% No team is winning anything with that GT mess around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Babcock is one of the game's most respected coaches by way of line combinations, match-ups and overall game strategy. The Red Wings won the Central 5 of his first 6 years with the team, putting up over 100 points in 8 of the 10 years he was with Detroit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 The Canadian media (mostly Toronto) have been talking about how his coaching is so good that he has the Leafs overachieving right now Wait, are they actually saying that about the Leafs? So where would the be without him, 0-15? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Crotch Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Babcock is one of the game's most respected coaches by way of line combinations, match-ups and overall game strategy. The Red Wings won the Central 5 of his first 6 years with the team, putting up over 100 points in 8 of the 10 years he was with Detroit. Went to Wikipedia, did ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I think it's the hair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 The Wings made the playoffs every single year he was there. They were a very consistent team, that is part of it. Through much of their 24(?) year playoff run, they could have made the playoffs with Nolan. In fact one could argue that Babs oversaw a general decline in the Wings competitiveness. They're my wife's favorite team and she couldn't wait for them to dump him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) It would be quite entertaining in the future if the Sabres lose the draft lottery end up With EIchle and lose out on Babcock and settle for Blysma only to see the EIchel having a better career than McDavid and Blysma more success behind the Sabres bench then Babcock in Toronto Basically we lose twice but both losses turn out to be difference making positives Edited November 12, 2015 by ddaryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I think the Red Wings have looked a lot worse, personally. Though I don't know how much of that to put on coaching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I really do think the Leafs are a well-coached team that is bad. Good coaching doesn't change the talent, it gets the most out of it. It's a bad team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Went to Wikipedia, did ya? Reminded me of buddy, who once had an argument with a teacher, after seeing he was wrong, he made a wiki page to prove his point. Thought it was epic , laughed my ass off :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Robi (Mike) was talking about Babcock during the Sabres' attempts to sign him, and he said some very specific things about how smart, hard-working, well-prepared, diligent, and creative the guy was with how he develops players, implements systems, game-plans for specific opponents, and then isolates good matchups on an in-game basis. Robi essentially said that Babcock was a guy who raised the bar on what a hockey coach can accomplish. I credit what Mike said. A few weeks ago, I heard a seasoned player -- someone still with DET -- say that there are now a number of imitators of Babcock out there in the league, and that the competitive advantage Babcock used to create isn't as great anymore because so many people have taken from what he's developed. Basically, it seems pretty well accepted in hockey circles that the guy is a terrific hockey coach, and an innovator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josie Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I think the Red Wings have looked a lot worse, personally. Though I don't know how much of that to put on coaching. Yep. Our superstars are retired or getting close, and are constantly injured (Lidstrom retired, Datsyuk's hurt more than he's not, Zetterberg has chronic back problems, Kronwall's getting up there). Our goalie situation isn't great. Currently Detroit is in a transitional period- the only reason we're barely hanging in our 24 year playoff streak is because the development system was set up so well. The new kids are mostly Blashill's Calder Cup winning (2013) Grand Rapids Griffins. They are talented, but growing pains/figuring out how to play at an NHL level has looked a bit... painful. Then there's Quincey getting stupid penalties and being a jerk. Oh well, he's out with an ankle injury for most the season. Hell, the new kids are fighting each other during practice (Pulkkinen and Smith reportedly, today). Keep in mind Blashill, the current coach, was/is pretty close to Babs, so he, like many other coaches now, is attempting to implement Bab style coaching. Babcock was stern, had that "lovable strict high school coach" thing going with his running around the arena before every game thing and respect for players. None of that Tortorella bombast or Roy insanity. As far as coaches go, he's good and fairly even keeled. I think it was time to move on though. I don't know about stagnant, but the glory years of his time were waning, time for someone new. I don't care what coach got Toronto, it's like squeezing water from a rock. If he can do it, my god, get that man a Jack Adams. Sorry for the homerism, I definitely suffer from it- Babs is still loved here, but damn do we enjoy watching his infamous stare when we beat Toronto in the JLA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I didn't understand the hype either. I was relieved when he took the Leaves job becuase I think Bylsma is a much better coach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) Thanks Josie. Heal up fast. I think it's because he's got a craggy, serious looking face. Edited November 12, 2015 by qwksndmonster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 I think the Red Wings have looked a lot worse, personally. Though I don't know how much of that to put on coaching. It's a transitional year. I bet they make the playoffs again. I think it was time to move on though. I don't know about stagnant, but the glory years of his time were waning, time for someone new. What do you think of Dylan Larkin? Looks like he's well on his way to being a star, almost like another Stevie Y. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josie Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 What do you think of Dylan Larkin? Looks like he's well on his way to being a star, almost like another Stevie Y. Larkin is pretty well loved by all the Red Wing fans I know. I'm personally pretty impressed. We'll see if it maintains, but he holds up well in the NHL thus far. He's got some p!ss n vinegar in him, which I like to see. I've heard the Yzerman comparison a few times, but I kinda stay away from making those judgements early on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) Yep. Our superstars are retired or getting close, and are constantly injured (Lidstrom retired, Datsyuk's hurt more than he's not, Zetterberg has chronic back problems, Kronwall's getting up there). Our goalie situation isn't great. Currently Detroit is in a transitional period- the only reason we're barely hanging in our 24 year playoff streak is because the development system was set up so well. The new kids are mostly Blashill's Calder Cup winning (2013) Grand Rapids Griffins. They are talented, but growing pains/figuring out how to play at an NHL level has looked a bit... painful. Then there's Quincey getting stupid penalties and being a jerk. Oh well, he's out with an ankle injury for most the season. Hell, the new kids are fighting each other during practice (Pulkkinen and Smith reportedly, today). Keep in mind Blashill, the current coach, was/is pretty close to Babs, so he, like many other coaches now, is attempting to implement Bab style coaching. Babcock was stern, had that "lovable strict high school coach" thing going with his running around the arena before every game thing and respect for players. None of that Tortorella bombast or Roy insanity. As far as coaches go, he's good and fairly even keeled. I think it was time to move on though. I don't know about stagnant, but the glory years of his time were waning, time for someone new. I don't care what coach got Toronto, it's like squeezing water from a rock. If he can do it, my god, get that man a Jack Adams. Sorry for the homerism, I definitely suffer from it- Babs is still loved here, but damn do we enjoy watching his infamous stare when we beat Toronto in the JLA. Thanks for the insight. I definitely am not down on their long-term outlook, and would agree it looks to be a transition year. And with the Atlantic looking to be so bad, they might be able to squeeze out home ice anyway. Edit: And feel better quick Josie, so sorry to hear about the injury! Edited November 12, 2015 by Randall Flagg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 Larkin is pretty well loved by all the Red Wing fans I know. I'm personally pretty impressed. We'll see if it maintains, but he holds up well in the NHL thus far. He's got some p!ss n vinegar in him, which I like to see. I've heard the Yzerman comparison a few times, but I kinda stay away from making those judgements early on... I've seen several of the Red Wing games, so I've seen Larkin play. To be honest, the Yzerman comparison jumped into my mind when I asked the question. I agree it's early to anoint him to such a high title, but he definitely looks promising. From what I've been seeing, this year's NHL rookie class (consisting of draft picks from this year and last year) could end up being being as influential on the NHL as the 1983 QB draft was on the NFL. There is just a boatload of new talent everywhere it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted November 12, 2015 Report Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) Robi (Mike) was talking about Babcock during the Sabres' attempts to sign him, and he said some very specific things about how smart, hard-working, well-prepared, diligent, and creative the guy was with how he develops players, implements systems, game-plans for specific opponents, and then isolates good matchups on an in-game basis. Robi essentially said that Babcock was a guy who raised the bar on what a hockey coach can accomplish. I credit what Mike said. A few weeks ago, I heard a seasoned player -- someone still with DET -- say that there are now a number of imitators of Babcock out there in the league, and that the competitive advantage Babcock used to create isn't as great anymore because so many people have taken from what he's developed. Basically, it seems pretty well accepted in hockey circles that the guy is a terrific hockey coach, and an innovator. the trick, as always, is to maintain the innovation so that others never catch up (Apple vs. Blackberry). Will be interesting to see if he can continue to innovate, or if what he brought to DET is all he's got (which apparently was substantial). Edited November 12, 2015 by We've Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
French Collection Posted November 13, 2015 Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 Babcock is a good coach but I lost all respect for him when he signs with the Leafs and says he likes to win. Wins most zeros after a digit contest at his local bank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted November 13, 2015 Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why is Babcock considered to be such a great coach? He won one cup with a good team. So did many others (including Bylsma, Torts, and others who were available last offseason). The wings still have the second best record in the NHL without him. The Leafs suck even worse with him. I don't get why he keeps getting cited for the Olympic Gold...I could coach the Canadians to a gold while blind drunk. Maybe I'm just saying this because he's arrogant, but I'm just not seeing it. Huh? The Wings have the 16th best record in the league. Did you mean division? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.