LGR4GM Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 sorry, goalie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 That’s early 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 First goalie in the draft. That much is interesting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted July 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 (edited) 20 hours ago, Brawndo said: That’s early 100% agree. they could have taken him in the 3rd, this is a reach. I very reachy reach. They might have got him in round 4 to be honest. Edit: with the way the draft played out, they probably had to take him here to get him so the initial reaction is probably wrong. Wanted to edit it in so in 3 years somebody doesn't dig this up and yell at me about it. Edited July 9, 2022 by LGR4GM Being Wrong 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr632 Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 All I know is he's big Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted July 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 (edited) I don't like it at all honestly. Well don't have to think about him again until 2027. Edited July 9, 2022 by LGR4GM 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 Just now, Kr632 said: All I know is he's big That’s what she said. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: 100% agree. they could have taken him in the 3rd, this is a reach. I very reachy reach. They might have got him in round 4 to be Could be a steal too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 With the talent that was available, this pick is seems bad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted July 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 minute ago, Brawndo said: With the talent that was available, this pick is seems bad Yea, I want to like it but 74 would have been far better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contempt Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 Another excuse not to sign a competent NHL goalie now. Another kid to not block. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, Contempt said: Another excuse not to sign a competent NHL goalie now. Another kid to not block. Nah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted July 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, Contempt said: Another excuse not to sign a competent NHL goalie now. Another kid to not block. lol, this is nonsensical. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 He was ranked the number 1 euro goalie by central scouting 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 We will just have to play like the Avs, and not give up many shots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MISabresFan Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 I believe he is the largest (height and weight) draft pick for the Sabres in 2022. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 (edited) FWIW, TSN only had one G listed in their remaining top 50 prospects starting the day and it wasn't Leinonen (Tyler Brennan, #44). Edited July 8, 2022 by ExWNYer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 Disappointing, but he was considered the top goalie of this class. Guess they felt it was better to take him now then lose him before 71 if that were possible. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contempt Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: lol, this is nonsensical. When they acquire a goaltender to play at least the next two years let me know 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irregularly irregular Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 (edited) Speaks to how desperate teams are to find good tenders. KA wanted to make sure he got the best option available this year. Edited July 8, 2022 by irregularly irregular 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 Drafting for need vs. drafting BPA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 8 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: I don't like it at all honestly. This was a major reach, dude should have gone 70 something. Well don't have to think about him again until 2027. "Reach" is something invented by draft nerds to discuss. (Remember when Shane Wright was a slam dunk #1 pick?) If he's good, no one will care where he was drafted. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 minute ago, Weave said: Drafting for need vs. drafting BPA If a team drafts for need at this point I feel like it’s gotta be pipeline need, especially considering how long goalies take. Considering our G prospect pipeline is loaded, my guess is Adams had this dude ranked highly for one reason or another 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcal Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: Disappointing, but he was considered the top goalie of this class. Guess they felt it was better to take him now then lose him before 71 if that were possible. I thought the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.