Jump to content

The Captain


Doohickie

Recommended Posts

It's almost impossible for us to predict this kind of thing. We may have a good idea of what kind of teammate someone like Ott might be but who's to say that a guy like Hodgson, who's the future of this time anyway, isn't a bit of a leader himself. I'm tired of rotating captains or a two-year wonder like Craig Rivet, let's anoint someone who'll keep that role for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll play devils advocate here in regards to Ott being captain. This is just me throwing it out there and not what I believe to be true or that contract situations should play a roll in who is selected captain. Having said that, apparently Ott and the Sabres are far apart regarding salary on a contract extension. By giving Ott the C you providing him with significantly more negotiating power which leads to the Sabres to overpaying for him or losing him come July. I say you give Vanek the C and hope the team plays well enough that he signs an extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll play devils advocate here in regards to Ott being captain. This is just me throwing it out there and not what I believe to be true or that contract situations should play a roll in who is selected captain. Having said that, apparently Ott and the Sabres are far apart regarding salary on a contract extension. By giving Ott the C you providing him with significantly more negotiating power which leads to the Sabres to overpaying for him or losing him come July. I say you give Vanek the C and hope the team plays well enough that he signs an extension.

 

The Clarkson contract F'd up negotiations IMO.

 

On captaincy, I think it's Vanek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll play devils advocate here in regards to Ott being captain. This is just me throwing it out there and not what I believe to be true or that contract situations should play a roll in who is selected captain. Having said that, apparently Ott and the Sabres are far apart regarding salary on a contract extension. By giving Ott the C you providing him with significantly more negotiating power which leads to the Sabres to overpaying for him or losing him come July. I say you give Vanek the C and hope the team plays well enough that he signs an extension.

 

But don't you think Ott is more likely to re-sign than Vanek is?

 

One of the reporters Twitter feed said something about how they're choosing someone based on the franchise's future, so, from that, I infer that Ott may not be in the mix (as he's not signed long-term). It makes me think there is something to the Hodgson theory.

 

Me too, but I don't like that outcome at all.

 

As I've said before, the captain needs to be someone who, in a Lucic-Miller situation, will immediately and forcefully deliver either a fist or a stick to the perp's face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...