shrader Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 "I just didn't close off cross-body," Miller said. "It was rising up and I didn't have a step on it, so I just looked stupid." :sick: Can't he just say "I screwed up" or "My bad"? Insecure and overanalytical, terrible combination for a goalie. Where does overanalytical fall in the character traits of message board posters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Where does overanalytical fall in the character traits of message board posters? Oh, cruel, sweet irony... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 "I just didn't close off cross-body," Miller said. "It was rising up and I didn't have a step on it, so I just looked stupid." :sick: Can't he just say "I screwed up" or "My bad"? Insecure and overanalytical, terrible combination for a goalie. So he is asked what happened on that goal, and instead of giving the generic "I screwed up" (which you would have undoubtedly jumped on him for as well), he gives a specific answer as to what happened which can be summarized as "I screwed up" and you still get on his case. Miller had a bad game and was the main reason why they lost yesterday and you don't like him. We get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdexchange Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Where does overanalytical fall in the character traits of message board posters? Irony is a beautiful thing.:lol: :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Did you hear what he said right before that? Something close to "I don't know how to say it without saying I screwed it up". Then just say that, Ryan! Edit: Here's the link to the audio U seem to think PA didn't hear that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assquatch Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 U seem to think PA didn't hear that. U seem to switch avatars when I switch to and from the mobile version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Nobody thought Darcy would get the endorsement he did. Everybody thought Pegula was this bad ass who was going to clean house, starting at the deadline. Connolly was going to be gone then. And, really, who would have predicted that he would use the Miller/Vanek injury excuse to explain missing the playoffs/getting bounced from the first round? Or that he would blame the News for the "quit" in the team, and expect the media to pull in their direction? Pegula -- anything's possible. Whatever floats his boat. but if he expects anyone in the league to buy into his "from now on Buffalo is hockey heaven" statement, he'd do himself a favor and drop Timmy in the off-season. Failure to dump a sufficient amount of passengers, both staff and players, will just turn the "Pegula Reign" in to "Golisano Part II". Doubt that'll attract anyone worth a mention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 "I just didn't close off cross-body," Miller said. "It was rising up and I didn't have a step on it, so I just looked stupid." :sick: Can't he just say "I screwed up" or "My bad"? Insecure and overanalytical, terrible combination for a goalie. So you've been begging all year for him to take personal responsibility, he does that and then some by explaining what he did wrong, and you still have a problem with it? Is there anything short of 98 shutouts that he can do to make you happy? Where does overanalytical fall in the character traits of message board posters? Oh... SNAP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 OK, not bad. Let's try it this way though. See how it feels: "There was a lot to hate. Another chance to choke tomorrow." Better, right? I'm looking for the right words to sincerely express that the application of your editorial voice to me isn't very much fun. I probably do it to you to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Insecure and overanalytical, terrible combination for a goalie. This is so comical it had to be on purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 I'm looking for the right words to sincerely express that the application of your editorial voice to me isn't very much fun. I probably do it to you to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHey6glPjF0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloFansR_Crazy Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHey6glPjF0 That is just plain funny. Which one in PA and which one is X.B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 No, satistical probabilities based on regression analysis. So you should bet if you believe your out of your butt predictions. I have to nitpick on this one a bit. It's not based on regression. It's a simulation. They simulate out the results of the remainder of the season a very large number of times and then they count how many times each team makes the playoffs. Only with you. I do stand corrected that the revised analysis is worse for the Sabres and better for the Canes-- it is 80% and 23% respectively. But it is the true probabilities as of right now. Whether you choose to believe it is the same as if you choose to believe the Earth is round. Just because you don't understand something does not make it scientifically untrue. Oh what the hell, another nitpick. I'm not so crazy about the phrase true probabilities there. They're assuming a probability of a win for each game based on previous results, which throws that word true right out the window. Personally, if there was anything we could label as "true", I'd go with all outcomes of a game being equally likely (although I don't know how an OTL would fit into that one). Maybe carp will chime in on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 U seem to switch avatars when I switch to and from the mobile version. In the mobile version of the board you see everyones personal pic, in the regular it is said avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 In the mobile version of the board you see everyones personal pic, in the regular it is said avatar. Both of your av's scare me. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 However I do not think they retain his services after this year unless it is for a greatly reduced price aka 1.5mil. Connolly is lockeroom cancer way more than roy in IMO but hey with Tpegs you never know if he loves connolly, however Black I think would persuade him otherwise. Rampant speculation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assquatch Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 In the mobile version of the board you see everyones personal pic, in the regular it is said avatar. And I only noticed hers changing? Oh, the power of bewbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Rampant speculation What else would you expect around here especially at this time of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 That is just plain funny. Which one in PA and which one is X.B? I'm the chick in the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 This is so comical it had to be on purpose. Me? Insecure? If I am insecure on this board, don't you think I have reason to be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Me? Insecure? If I am insecure on this board, don't you think I have reason to be? Lent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Lent. Whointhehell gives up innuendo on the internet for Lent anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Whointhehell gives up innuendo on the internet for Lent anyway? Easier than the real thing. Orisit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assquatch Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Whointhehell gives up innuendo on the internet for Lent anyway? Innuendo is innuendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Lent. When you become a mod, don't they take into a secure room and inform you about all the deep, dark, dirty secrets of SabreSpace? Like when they tell the president Jackie had Jack killed, and the secret recipe for Coke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.