JohnC Posted Sunday at 06:15 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:15 PM 27 minutes ago, Thorny said: Can reporters be waived by the team they are covering? 🙂 1 1 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted Sunday at 06:45 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:45 PM 57 minutes ago, Thorny said: He's correct in that there doesn't seem to be any semblance of a plan in mind 2 4 Quote
Pimlach Posted Sunday at 07:35 PM Report Posted Sunday at 07:35 PM 3 hours ago, JohnC said: Why would Dallas want a Byram knowing that in a year he will pursuing a long term bonanza contract? And let’s not forget that Dallas is a serious Cup contending team that will likely make the required adjustments to keep him. I do like Zucker a lot and how he plays. But I consider him a good third line player on a rugged line on a good team. However, when you have a dearth of talent you have to adjust to that reality, at least for the time being. I would let Dallas decide that on Byram. If they’re not interested so be it. Move on. Dallas has a big cap problem and Robertson could be available. The fear that Byram is pursuing a long term bonanza contract is a bit wild. He really has not proven he is worth that, and in Buffalo he doesn’t get the opportunity to prove he is worth a big contract, in Buffalo Dahlin is #1, and Power is being favored as the #2 power play defenseman. Leaving Byram out Byram may be happy to sign bridge with a contender like Dallas, or any other contender. Or he may like to join an up and coming team that needs his skills? We don't know what he wants, we only know he allegedly moved his stuff out of Buffalo, yet he says he is interested in re-signing. Quote
dudacek Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Probably premature because I don't expect Byram here, but aren't most people expecting: Byram Dahlin Power Kesselring Samuelsson Timmins Something Adams said about helping Power makes me wonder if we could see: Byram Dahlin Samuelsson Kesselring Power Timmins Four reasons: Adams says he wants a simple puck-touch, low-risk type playing with Power, that's Timmins game and he played his best hockey being that guy with Karlsson This set-up allows you to shelter Power somewhat at even-strength and rebuild his confidence against lesser opponents Kesselring's attitude may bring out some of that from Mule and help him play more like the concept of Mule The size/range of the second pair is such that maybe you can lean on them in defensive situations 1 1 Quote
Taro T Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 minute ago, dudacek said: Probably premature because I don't expect Byram here, but aren't most people expecting: Byram Dahlin Power Kesselring Samuelsson Timmins Something Adams said about helping Power makes me wonder if we could see: Byram Dahlin Samuelsson Kesselring Power Timmins Four reasons: Adams says he wants a simple puck-touch, low-risk type playing with Power, that's Timmins game and he played his best hockey being that guy with Karlsson This set-up allows you to shelter Power somewhat at even-strength and rebuild his confidence against lesser opponents Kesselring's attitude may bring out some of that from Mule and help him play more like the concept of Mule The size/range of the second pair is such that maybe you can lean on them in defensive situations Thought there's a possibility Timmons would be Power's partner, but saw Kesselring as Dahlin's partner in that scenario. Your combos are interesting. Quote
inkman Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, dudacek said: Probably premature because I don't expect Byram here, but aren't most people expecting: Byram Dahlin Power Kesselring Samuelsson Timmins Something Adams said about helping Power makes me wonder if we could see: Byram Dahlin Samuelsson Kesselring Power Timmins Four reasons: Adams says he wants a simple puck-touch, low-risk type playing with Power, that's Timmins game and he played his best hockey being that guy with Karlsson This set-up allows you to shelter Power somewhat at even-strength and rebuild his confidence against lesser opponents Kesselring's attitude may bring out some of that from Mule and help him play more like the concept of Mule The size/range of the second pair is such that maybe you can lean on them in defensive situations If Samuelsson gets top 4 minutes, just fold the franchise. Clifton was better FFS. JBD was better. Kale freaking Clague may have been better. Everyone who has played D for the Sabres since Samuelsson’s arrival has been better minus Jacob Bryson. Edited 13 hours ago by inkman Quote
LGR4GM Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 6 minutes ago, inkman said: If Samuelsson gets top 4 minutes, just fold the franchise. Clifton was better FFS. JBD was better. Kale freaking Clague may have been better. Everyone who has played D for the Sabres since Samuelsson’s arrival has been better minus Jacob Bryson. Samuelsson: 14pts... 14 entire points. -12.3relCF%, -11.6xgf% and yet they start him in the defense zone 73% of the time, even though he's not good at defense. He might be average or so but woof. 1 Quote
darksabre Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago On 6/29/2025 at 2:45 PM, Turbo44 said: He's correct in that there doesn't seem to be any semblance of a plan in mind Two things can be correct at once. The team is incompetent and Chad is obnoxious. Quote
shrader Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, inkman said: If Samuelsson gets top 4 minutes, just fold the franchise. Clifton was better FFS. JBD was better. Kale freaking Clague may have been better. Everyone who has played D for the Sabres since Samuelsson’s arrival has been better minus Jacob Bryson. I do wonder how different he could look if he's consistently getting 3rd pair minutes. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.