Jump to content

GDT: Sabres @ Devils - April 11, 2023, 7pm, MSG 📺 WGR 📻


LGR4GM

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

I know he's hurt and probably wouldn't be playing if the games didn't matter but if Tage hadn't been dogshit the last 4 weeks we'd probably have made it in. 

 

Was Tage going to play goalie or defense in those games ??? 

  • dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder where the Sabres would be if Granato actually had them focus on a full 200 foot game instead of offense 100% of the time. Many players wouldn’t have had career years.  IF they focus on defense next season many fans will be greatly disappointed when you don’t have multiple players with sky high goal and point totals. 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Crusader1969 said:

Crazy night.  The puck just wouldn’t go in the net 

Hope you all enjoyed watching them battle to get into the playoffs. Won’t experience this again next year 


next season, they will making the playoffs easily and the only thing that we will have to think about by game 80 is - who we are playing in round 1

I can't imagine what'll happen if we don't make it next season somehow

This season has given everyone a lot of hope
and hope is a dangerous thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scottysabres said:

While it is disappointing, the future looks better now than it has in some years. I am optimistic they will make it next year. These players are oh so young, their bodies are still filling out frame wise. The future is brighter now.

Go Sabres!!!!!!!!!!

Go Sabres indeed!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pimlach said:

You happy with 2 ENGs ?  

Happy?  No.  I'd be happier if Granato understood how and when to pull a goalie and with 3 ENGs.  ENGs in a game like this do not matter.  You and I are a little older than some of the posters here, so do you remember when all the statistical literature came out about when NOT to punt in the NFL?  And how coaches ignored it for 15 years?  And how now, the well-coached teams follow those protocols?  Similar statistical analyses are now available for pulling a goalie in the NHL, and those analytics say "early and often."  The only coach whom I have noticed actually following those recommendations was on the winning bench tonight.

 

Granato is a ***** *****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sidc3000 said:

I wonder where the Sabres would be if Granato actually had them focus on a full 200 foot game instead of offense 100% of the time. Many players wouldn’t have had career years.  IF they focus on defense next season many fans will be greatly disappointed when you don’t have multiple players with sky high goal and point totals. 

IDK - I feel the D Corps and Goaltending have been our Achilles heel....that and special teams.  But I'd like to contend that our coaching could do much better having certain D-men like Joki focus on Defense first.  If he and others focused on d-zone coverage and neutralizing high danger threats, we would have won more games. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

Was Tage going to play goalie or defense in those games ??? 

The margin is just so slim that if we had replaced 20 games of injured Tage with 20 games of Hart Tage, it's hard to imagine not getting a couple more wins. To be clear, I'm not blaming Tage for being dogshit, he gutted through admirably. 

Edited by Randall Flagg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eleven said:

Happy?  No.  I'd be happier if Granato understood how and when to pull a goalie and with 3 ENGs.  ENGs in a game like this do not matter.  You and I are a little older than some of the posters here, so do you remember when all the statistical literature came out about when NOT to punt in the NFL?  And how coaches ignored it for 15 years?  And how now, the well-coached teams follow those protocols?  Similar statistical analyses are now available for pulling a goalie in the NHL, and those analytics say "early and often."  The only coach whom I have noticed actually following those recommendations was on the winning bench tonight.

 

Granato is a ***** *****.

I don’t think pulling the goalie was the problem.  We missed our opportunities tonight and they didn’t.  
 

The back to back was asking for  much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's plenty of time to debate ifs and buts.

For tonight I am going to just be happy that this time was not eliminated until game 80 of the season.

There's only one direction now.. the future.  I'll be looking forward to it.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sidc3000 said:

I wonder where the Sabres would be if Granato actually had them focus on a full 200 foot game instead of offense 100% of the time. Many players wouldn’t have had career years.  IF they focus on defense next season many fans will be greatly disappointed when you don’t have multiple players with sky high goal and point totals. 

It’s a process.  Maybe they would have been better off in the short run by a little but the long term is much more important to learn to score and play without fear 
they aren’t looking to be just good -they want to be great 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NJ is a tough team and had several motivations behind this game. Buffalo second of a back-to-back also with a lot to play for. 

A pity.

Anyway, was watching the NJ feed - if I hear the name "Hughes" again for several days I'm going to lose it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pimlach said:

I don’t think pulling the goalie was the problem.  We missed our opportunities tonight and they didn’t.  
 

The back to back was asking for  much.  

I think this game would have been out of hand early in the second with UPL or Comrie.

I agree with the missed opportunities part.

I do not agree w/ Granato's lineup nor do I agree w/ his late-game decision making (as usual).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eleven said:

He was going to score at will like usual.  The loss of him definitely hurt.

The loss of him hurt, as did Tuch and Dahlin and Samuelsson.  Why the poster singled out Tage is ridiculous and unfair.  He didn’t play like dog$hit either.  He played hurt.  
 

The goaltending and the defensive system are the reason we fell short. Not Tage and his injuries.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LTS said:

There's plenty of time to debate ifs and buts.

For tonight I am going to just be happy that this time was not eliminated until game 80 of the season.

There's only one direction now.. the future.  I'll be looking forward to it.

And there's actually a very good chance that had they gotten to play C-Bus back when they were supposed to have done so, they'd've actually made it to game 81 before getting eliminated.

Baby step.  

Now, win the next 2 games and get back into the 90's that is the minimum necessary to get into the conversation for the playoffs.  It's been too long since they've even been there. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...