Taro T Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Thorny said: He's not wrong. 1 3 Quote
sabremike Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Clearly the solution is to bring in a guy who recently handed Pierre Engvall a 7 year contract... Quote
Pimlach Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 4 hours ago, Flashsabre said: His tenure in NJ was one of the longest and most successful of any GM in his time. 27 seasons, 5 Cup appearances and 3 Cup wins. Given the past 14 seasons, if he advises Adams I just can’t see it hurting. Not sure this is real though. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Lou certainly fits the "senior" part of the equation. I'm actually all for that. Why not have a cranky old man in there to not take any crap and tell Kevyn when he's being an idiot (so like, every day). We need a contrarian and Lou could be that. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago Lou’s first piece of advice to Terry will be to fire Adams and bring in a real GM. 1 Quote
thewookie1 Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 21 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Lou’s first piece of advice to Terry will be to fire Adams and bring in a real GM. My fear would be he'd want himself as that GM and I want nothing to do with 0 info and anti-beard mn Quote
Flashsabre Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) I doubt it happens but god forbid Lou came in as Senior Advisor and ruined the 15 year dynasty that Pegula has put together here. Edited 5 hours ago by Flashsabre 2 2 3 Quote
JohnC Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Lou’s first piece of advice to Terry will be to fire Adams and bring in a real GM. The recommendation for the replacement GM would be his son , Chris. Our owner has given his franchise an identity i.e. peculiar and laughable. It’s so sad and enraging what this silent owner with the big boat has done to this infected franchise. He should be arrested for felonious stupidity. 1 Quote
inkman Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, thewookie1 said: My fear would be he'd want himself as that GM and I want nothing to do with 0 info and anti-beard mn To be fair, Alex Tuch is the only player whose beard is an asset. All the other peach fuzz growers can rejoice. Quote
Pimlach Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, thewookie1 said: My fear would be he'd want himself as that GM and I want nothing to do with 0 info and anti-beard mn The New York Yankees had a tradition of no facial hair and it didn’t hurt a thing. Quote
JohnC Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, thewookie1 said: My fear would be he'd want himself as that GM and I want nothing to do with 0 info and anti-beard mn What's even more obvious and worrisome is that credible candidates have little interest in joining a Pegula owned team. It's widely known that the owner's overhanging presence has made this a pariah franchise to be avoided. Lou L has had an impressive career as a hockey executive. His era is over with. The most impactful change that has to be made is how the owner presides over the franchise. Until there is a change there, this franchise will be unappealing to qualified people who can put this flailing franchise on the right road. Quote
JohnC Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Pimlach said: The New York Yankees had a tradition of no facial hair and it didn’t hurt a thing. Do they still have the no facial rules? The era of dictating grooming standards to a 60s level is long past. How you play and how you conduct yourself are the more important issues. The hair issue on top and on your face are irrelevant and outmoded. Lou L was terrific hockey manager for his era. It's long past. Quote
Pimlach Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 17 minutes ago, JohnC said: Do they still have the no facial rules? The era of dictating grooming standards to a 60s level is long past. How you play and how you conduct yourself are the more important issues. The hair issue on top and on your face are irrelevant and outmoded. Lou L was terrific hockey manager for his era. It's long past. Steinbrenner’s kid, Hal, just recently changed the teams facial hair rule. 1 Quote
SwampD Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 11 hours ago, Pimlach said: His tenure in NJ was one of the longest and most successful of any GM in his time. 27 seasons, 5 Cup appearances and 3 Cup wins. Given the past 14 seasons, if he advises Adams I just can’t see it hurting. Not sure this is real though. He also had the one of the top goalies ever, during the no cap era. I’m sure that helped. The last year they won, his team had a salary that was $20 MM more than the Sabres, which back then was about a third more. (Iirc, the Sabres total salary was around $35MM and the Devils was around $55MM.) Edited 3 hours ago by SwampD Quote
Pimlach Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, SwampD said: He also had the one of the top goalies ever during the no cap era. The last year they won, his team had a salary that was 20 MM more than the Sabres, which back then was about a third more. (Iirc, the Sabres total salary was around $35MM and the Devils was around $55MM.) Every winning coach or GM has great players. Every winning coach or GM adapts to current league rules, salary cap constraints, etc. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago I bet Lou is the guy. It makes too much sense and he's unlikely to get a GM offer. 1 minute ago, Pimlach said: Every winning coach or GM has great players. Every winning coach or GM adapts to current league rules, salary cap constraints, etc. If Lou was so good adapting to the cap wouldn't his record reflect that? Quote
SwampD Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Pimlach said: Every winning coach or GM has great players. Every winning coach or GM adapts to current league rules, salary cap constraints, etc. And he hasn’t since the cap. That’s all I’m sayin. I don’t want him as a part of the Sabres. 1 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, SwampD said: And he hasn’t since the cap. That’s all I’m sayin. I don’t want him as a part of the Sabres. I'd take him over no one 1 1 Quote
SwampD Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: I'd take him over no one He’s also 82. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, SwampD said: He’s also 82. My God, just retire man. Enjoy your last years, take up fishing or pottery or spelunking. 2 2 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: My God, just retire man. Enjoy your last years, take up fishing or pottery or spelunking. At age 82? Quote
LGR4GM Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: At age 82? At that point you're hanging out on Death's doorstep anyways, might as well knock every once and awhile for funsies. 4 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago I'd like to see Lou get involved as a voice, but his recent teams aren't all that impressive. I do think it'd be fun for him to get Adams canned, then get upset one day and can Ruff and take over as the head coach for a game, then mid-game, fire all the assistant coaches. The Great Lamoriello Purge. The biggest anti-Lou sentiment I have though is that when he took over the Islanders, they changed the name of the Bridgeport Sound Tigers to the Bridgeport Islanders to "have a stronger sense of affiliation between the big team and the little team." BS. The Sound Tigers was a great name. Let your AHL team be its own brand with its own colors and civic pride and culture. Let it have a goofy name and live out silly minor-league antics. Can you imagine the depression if Rochester became known as the Baby Sabres? For that reason alone: no Lou for me. 2 Quote
Archie Lee Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago I like the idea of Lou as a senior advisor only slightly more than I like the idea of Kevyn Adams staying on as GM, which means I really hate it. But, this is who you get as senior advisors: Either a recent GM who wants to get back in, or a really old guy who is driven by nothing but hockey and who just wants to stay involved in some capacity. I guess my big concern with Lou is that he advises Adams to be more bold. I mean, maybe the one positive thing about Adams and his general state of reluctance to make big moves, is that it has actually prevented more bad than good. If Lou’s impact is for Adams to be more bold, is that a good thing? Maybe. But maybe the best we can hope for is to survive this season with minimal damage and then move on to a new regime. Quote
Archie Lee Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, JohnC said: What's even more obvious and worrisome is that credible candidates have little interest in joining a Pegula owned team. It's widely known that the owner's overhanging presence has made this a pariah franchise to be avoided. Lou L has had an impressive career as a hockey executive. His era is over with. The most impactful change that has to be made is how the owner presides over the franchise. Until there is a change there, this franchise will be unappealing to qualified people who can put this flailing franchise on the right road. What’s weird to me, is that you would think the Bills’ success would make it easy for Pegula to attract a good hockey man. Why can’t he approach someone like Rob Blake and just explain that he just hasn’t found a Beane or McDermott on the hockey side and that he thinks Blake could be that guy and the plan is to just stay out of the way. Give Blake a 4-5 year $20-$25 million contract and tell him to go out and find our young Montgomery or DeBoer or Cassidy. It should not be complicated. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.