LTS

I sat here for 15 minutes trying to think of a way to respond to this and all I came up with was... WOW. Now I'm going to get Advil because it hurts from shaking my head so much while I was sitting here.

Do you have any idea what this would do to @MODO Hockey? He'd likely test the board's ability to embed Peter Griffin GIFs in a single post.

Can we just be happy Cozens is back and use another of the 72 billion threads to debate GMs? 🙂 Cozens is back yo. Cozens is back. This is good news. Let's just bask in this for a bit. We need it.

Well for those who wanted Adams to do something. He's now done two things in a week. I hope that's enough.

My son was telling me about this. It's awful. It brought back memories of watching Chris Pronger take a slapshot in the chest, taking one step and collapsing on the ice. Between that and the Malarchuk incident... man.. bad memories.

Thanks for clarifying your mindset.

I want to know what automaton Brawndo has that scours the Internet for information and posts it here for us. There's no way a human can live a life and be that responsive. 🙂 Awesome stuff as always Brawndo, "You got what SabreSpace needs."

Yeah, he was in Pittsburgh in then. Then went to Carolina and got wonders from McIlhenney and such. But here the goaltending has been awful... sometimes it doesn't translate. Perhaps Ullmark is better because of him, but Hutton and JJ not so much. Always hard to say. Sometimes a player just excels or fails despite the coach and other times I am sure there's a connection and a benefit... and sometimes I bet a coach can destroy a player.

And Bales supposedly worked wonders with their goaltending right? It's not an easy answer. If it were just Dahlin I would give a lot less crap to Steve Smith but it really isn't just Dahlin. He's not playing well, his confidence is way down and I think that plays a huge amount into how he performs. he needs to get an upward cycle and build on it.

There it is. Not a fan of the 1-2-2, especially if your D are giving up the line. No quick passing support. And the cheating.. ugh.. you play with 1 person on the ice who doesn't do their job and you might as well be short handed. Hmm.. go figure. 🙂 Everything about them said, play defensive first, don't give up a goal. If you get the puck try and counter on a long pass. Puck possession is not important. The worst formula you can use. Thanks for digging that up.

Totally. I think many said it all along. You see a team spread out over the ice, one guy on the forecheck most of the time or guys backing out of the battle for the puck. Dumping the puck in and hoping one guy can beat two to the puck. Long passes. That's not how you win in this game. You need two to three guys near the puck. It's not a big area game. That might work somewhat on international rinks but not in the North American rink. Looking forward to excerpts if you get them.

You can take 5 of the most talented people and put them together to play. It doesn't mean they will play together. When player A believes he should go left and player B expected him to cross the line, that ends up in off-side. The point being, the coach is the one who brings them together to play as a team and not a group of individuals. If your group of individuals is going off-side in practice then they are not working as hard as they should, paying attention to detail, etc. It might be that he was the least tied to what the team had been doing and so provided the best choice for an interim coach to smooth transition.

No, you're right. I wouldn't mind that atoll. Perhaps we hang him upside down and send him acrost the Falls on a wire and see what happens?

To a certain degree I think this is accurate, but the output on the ice is a reflection of the preparation and attention to detail that occurs in practice. The clear lack of discipline in the defensive zone, the lack of puck possession, etc. are all reflections of what the coaching staff are teaching. I don't disregard the article from the former captains of the Sabres or the input of others who have coached and played because their experience gives them an awareness that others simply don't have.

I will hope to find time to listen. I wonder how much insight he has into things from people talking to him. Certainly lots of it is obvious from the outside, but I would bet he's been able to discuss some things with people who have direct knowledge too. One can only hope that all this negative attention they are receiving finally smacks them upside the head to operate better and make the changes necessary. Right now I don't have faith until I see the owners change. The "we know best" schtick is tiring, irksome, and condescending.

Well... at first I was excited because I remember now that the Sabres actually play one of the teams normally in their division. Boston, it's been too long. And now... it would seem more waiting is in order. By the end of this the Sabres and Boston will have to play 8 games in 8 days to get the season in. Or the league just gives the wins to the Bruins and calls it a day.

listening on WGR for now.. but if there is a link I'm all in!

That's just straight fire boys.

When I start getting paid to post I'll focus on the detail... or is it details?

The share matters on viewership. 10% of 1 million and 1% of 10 million still equate to the same number of eyeballs.

Yes, and yet here are all these players having trouble with the basics of the game. It's not coaching onsides so much as coaching the details in the game. You allow the players to cut corners and they will adapt to that level of play. The overall play deteriorates because opponents don't allow those corners to be cut. The team being held to the precision required to push the line but NOT be offsides is one example of demanding focus and precision across all aspects of the game.

Which Granato? 🙂

Maybe I need to change my avatar? It's a good day. Now we can all debate what comes next. I think the bigger message here is that Steve Smith is gone. Ralph was admittedly just the motivator... Smith has persisted behind the scenes and our D coverage has been awful.

That's true, but I think the Pegulas eventually sell if they can't get it right. At some point they will care enough to not be tied to what they've created. The team will eventually get better. But potentially not for awhile. I agree with your last statement, but the love for hockey in Buffalo is not solely seeded by the Sabres. I think having a team, in market, that can win back hearts will do so. By no means am I saying this ideal, it's anything but. I just give a lot of credit to the fans of hockey in Buffalo and surrounding areas.

I would imagine that the stuff you see in the games is accepted in practice and that's the problem. There is clearly no attention paid to the little things and those little things make a difference. Everything about how they play, to me, indicates poor coaching. A team that is not sharp and not required to be sharp.