Jump to content

GDT Sabres at Detroit 2/22/18 7:30 pm GR MSG


Brawndo

Recommended Posts

Right, but the Red Wings were a pretty sad franchise for the first half of his career.  Kind of where the Sabres were prior to the tank- playoff purgatory- often a playoff team, rarely a real contender.  He didn't win a Cup until his 14th year in the league.


Red Wings attendance was so bad in the early Yzerman era that they gave away a car at EVERY game to boost attendance.

Edited by Anordning
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but the Red Wings were a pretty sad franchise for the first half of his career.  Kind of where the Sabres were prior to the tank- playoff purgatory- often a playoff team, rarely a real contender.  He didn't win a Cup until his 14th year in the league.

Red Wings attendance was so bad in the early Yzerman era that they gave away a car at EVERY game to boost attendance.

 

They went to the conference finals in years 4 and 5 of his career.  And playoffs in the 6th as well.  the bottom dropped out again for awhile afterward, but they were a playoff team when Y was 22-24 yrs old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They went to the conference finals in years 4 and 5 of his career.  And playoffs in the 6th as well.  the bottom dropped out again for awhile afterward, but they were a playoff team when Y was 22-24 yrs old.

From the f###ing Norris division. At a time when teams played the 1st 2 rounds in division, they got to play in the f###ing Norris. Even friggin' SI which could not care less about hockey (Gretzky mildly excepted) ran an article about how awful the division was.

 

That 1st year, not even ONE SINGLE TEAM played 0.500 hockey out of 5.

 

The next year, Detroit's record looked reasonable (41-28-11 - 93 for 5th best in the NHL) but they played THIRTY TWO of 80 against teams that finished with 76, 68, 52, & 51 points. The team that only accumulated 52 points took Detroit to 7 games that 1st round. Yes, it took them SEVEN games to win 4 against the 2nd worst team in the league.

 

They followed those seasons with a 1st place 0.500 season & a 1st round exit to a 66 point Blackhawk team & then missed the playoffs the next year w/ 70 points.

 

They weren't called the Dead Things for nothing.

 

IMHO, they weren't "good" until '91-'92 & weren't even considered a contender until '92-'93. Those were Yzerman's 9th & 10th years.

 

When 16 of 21 make the playoffs, AND your division ALWAYS has at least 1 of the 3 worst teams, it's not a huge accomplishment to make the playoffs, again, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the f###ing Norris division. At a time when teams played the 1st 2 rounds in division, they got to play in the f###ing Norris. Even friggin' SI which could not care less about hockey (Gretzky mildly excepted) ran an article about how awful the division was.

 

That 1st year, not even ONE SINGLE TEAM played 0.500 hockey out of 5.

 

The next year, Detroit's record looked reasonable (41-28-11 - 93 for 5th best in the NHL) but they played THIRTY TWO of 80 against teams that finished with 76, 68, 52, & 51 points. The team that only accumulated 52 points took Detroit to 7 games that 1st round. Yes, it took them SEVEN games to win 4 against the 2nd worst team in the league.

 

They followed those seasons with a 1st place 0.500 season & a 1st round exit to a 66 point Blackhawk team & then missed the playoffs the next year w/ 70 points.

 

They weren't called the Dead Things for nothing.

 

IMHO, they weren't "good" until '91-'92 & weren't even considered a contender until '92-'93. Those were Yzerman's 9th & 10th years.

 

When 16 of 21 make the playoffs, AND your division ALWAYS has at least 1 of the 3 worst teams, it's not a huge accomplishment to make the playoffs, again, IMHO.

 

Just get me to the damned playoffs.  I don't give a rats azz about how easy the path was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really stupid to play Kane tonight.

Agree. Can't imagine why they would. Other than it's the Sabres. Frankly surprised that Botterill is having him play. First occasion I've had to question him as our GM.These are meaningless games. Sorry seems stupid.

Edited by Radar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the sound of what is coming out of this organization right now. It seems like they are preparing the fan-base for another couple years of pain. It stinks that Eichel will probably waste on this team for another couple years before his talents even mean anything. 

 

I would not bring up any of the young talent next year because chances are, this team is preparing for another step back before moving forward. At least the royal blues will be back in time for what may be the first run at a playoff spot in a while.

 

 

This, at the end of the day, is far and away the most sad and disappointing thing about the state of the Sabres.

 

It was eloquently stated on hfboards that there is only one outcome in which this game will be remembered by a single fan any time later than three months from now, and that outcome is if Evander Kane gets hurt.

 

This is what it has come to.

Thanks, Terry.

The Rangers aren’t playing Nash. Mind boggling decision from Botterill, here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...