LGR4GM Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 it's been mentioned in several threads so mods can merge everything into one. Forbort and #11 Kempe and #11 What does it take to get Kane to LA and should we expect in return? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-90 W Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Forbort and #11. 25 year old lhd, former #15 overall. Took a long time to crack LA due to blue line depth. Played top munutes last year. Versatile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 I don't really want to trade Kane to that team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 I don't really want to trade Kane to that team If we're trading Kane, the best place to trade him is to the WC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 If we're trading Kane, the best place to trade him is to the WC. Soooo let's pick a western team with better defensemen :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 If we're trading Kane, the best place to trade him is to the WC. There's just not a ton to like coming back our way. Soooo let's pick a western team with better defensemen :P Yes, this. Down year and all, I'd be interested in Muzzin...but for some reason I don't see that happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-90 W Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 LA is in a position that we can deal Kane to and get a handsome return all things considered. Imagine getting an additional early first rounder, and a proven 25 yo dman for someone who will most likely walk at the end of next season? We could have Forbort and draft two more dmen at #8 and #11. Our d would be looking legit long term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 LA is in a position that we can deal Kane to and get a handsome return all things considered. Imagine getting an additional early first rounder, and a proven 25 yo dman for someone who will most likely walk at the end of next season? We could have Forbort and draft two more dmen at #8 and #11. Our d would be looking legit long term. I think you're way too excited about one okay season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-90 W Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 I think you're way too excited about one okay season. A trade with LA for him and #11 would literally transform our defense for a decade. Why wouldn't I be psyched? Hes a gem and hes cheap. Kind of guy JB will want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 A trade with LA for him and #11 would literally transform our defense for a decade. Why wouldn't I be psyched? Hes a gem and hes cheap. Kind of guy JB will want. I'm curious, if you were to define a tier for Forbort relative to other NHL defensemen, where would you put him? No need to give a number, it's way too hard to try and remember all the defensemen, but who are some other defensemen you'd be equally as excited to have on the Sabres? I'm just a little confused by who you think this guy is haha. As for the bolded, I don't see how he could have this big of an impact. He's decent at shot suppression and horrendous at shot generation. His CA/60 relative to the Kings is fine, but his CF/60 relative to the Kings is something like -9% which is ludicrously low. This team's primary need is not a pre-death Josh Gorges at the moment. We allowed fewer shots than average from the area in front of the net where the defensemen are responsible for this past year, and may well have been the worst team in the NHL at moving the puck up the ice as a cohesive unit, something that is driven by defensemen. Derek has shown to be bad at that. Furthermore, Botterill's old team acquired guys like Daley and Schultz, who don't suppress shots or even know how to play defense half the time, but who can relentlessly make correct, precise decisions to get the puck in the right direction. I don't see how he's a Botterill kind of player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winston Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Proposal from twitter: Kane + 8 for Muzzin + 11 Muzzin is signed through 19-20 season at $4M per. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-90 W Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 I'm curious, if you were to define a tier for Forbort relative to other NHL defensemen, where would you put him? No need to give a number, it's way too hard to try and remember all the defensemen, but who are some other defensemen you'd be equally as excited to have on the Sabres? I'm just a little confused by who you think this guy is haha. As for the bolded, I don't see how he could have this big of an impact. He's decent at shot suppression and horrendous at shot generation. His CA/60 relative to the Kings is fine, but his CF/60 relative to the Kings is something like -9% which is ludicrously low. This team's primary need is not a pre-death Josh Gorges at the moment. We allowed fewer shots than average from the area in front of the net where the defensemen are responsible for this past year, and may well have been the worst team in the NHL at moving the puck up the ice as a cohesive unit, something that is driven by defensemen. Derek has shown to be bad at that. Furthermore, Botterill's old team acquired guys like Daley and Schultz, who don't suppress shots or even know how to play defense half the time, but who can relentlessly make correct, precise decisions to get the puck in the right direction. I don't see how he's a Botterill kind of player. I admit that I don't know hockey as much as you and some of the other guys on here, and some of the stats you just talked about are things that I don't follow on a league wide level. I just know what I have read about him that he's a shutdown defender, I like his size, and am impressed how he stepped into a top minutes role last year. I say he's a JB kind of guy in that the Pitt model is pay the stars, get creative with supporting cast. Forbort would come cheap. Wasn't referring to puck moving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Proposal from twitter: Kane + 8 for Muzzin + 11 Muzzin is signed through 19-20 season at $4M per. I'm unwilling to trade down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 I admit that I don't know hockey as much as you and some of the other guys on here, and some of the stats you just talked about are things that I don't follow on a league wide level. I just know what I have read about him that he's a shutdown defender, I like his size, and am impressed how he stepped into a top minutes role last year. I say he's a JB kind of guy in that the Pitt model is pay the stars, get creative with supporting cast. Forbort would come cheap. Wasn't referring to puck moving. Then we should pay Kane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Proposal from twitter: Kane + 8 for Muzzin + 11 Muzzin is signed through 19-20 season at $4M per. That's awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallawaySabres Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Did I miss the part of why people want to trade Kane from a team that has a terrible offense to begin with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Did I miss the part of why people want to trade Kane from a team that has a terrible offense to begin with? Listen, this is Buffalo. Where there is no room for 50 goal scorers, where everyone hates the last guy to score 80 points, and where you always wish to trade your leading goal scorer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Listen, this is Buffalo. Where there is no room for 50 goal scorers, where everyone hates the last guy to score 80 points, and where you always wish to trade your leading goal scorer. because we prefer Rob Ray, Brad May, Matthew Barnaby as opposed to players with talent who can actually play. I guess watching Kane on Eichel's left wing wasn't good enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted June 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 No love for Adrian Kempe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Did I miss the part of why people want to trade Kane from a team that has a terrible offense to begin with?We don't have a terrible offense, we have a bad defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 That's awful. Why? We get the better player at a position of greater need, and on a cheaper contract to boot. Did I miss the part of why people want to trade Kane from a team that has a terrible offense to begin with? I don't want to give 7 years to a guy with Kane's injury history who will be 28 when the contract kicks in, and I don't want to invest $6 million in cap space in a non-elite winger who isn't a great fit with our best players. No love for Adrian Kempe? I just don't know much about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Keeping forwards the same and fixing the defense and system will make our offense one of the best out there. These guys could barely enter the zone on the power play and yet were 26% in Jack's 61 games. There's a ton of skill up there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Keeping forwards the same and fixing the defense and system will make our offense one of the best out there. These guys could barely enter the zone on the power play and yet were 26% in Jack's 61 games. There's a ton of skill up there. Yep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Then we should pay Kane Unless he has no plans on re-signing, which he most certainly seems like he won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Unless he has no plans on re-signing, which he most certainly seems like he won't. How do we know anything about this? I may have missed something in the last week or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.