rickshaw Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 I admit I don't get to watch of games out here on the West Coast but I do see lots of hi (low) lights. And it's very clear from my perch that Lehner is not a capable starter in the NHL. Backup, yes, but go to guy, no. Not by a long shot. Yes he's tough and has a fire in his belly but that doesn't stop shyte goals like Martin's goal against Toronto. That is the goal that breaks a team's back. The one that deflates them. The team also has too much dead weight. Too many slow, breaking down defencemen. I'd prefer the group get or use their best young D and let them get the experience. The team has 5 goals by defence this year. FIVE! 4 I believe are by #55 who is gonna be a beauty. The bottom 3 defence are old, slow and/or breaking down and that's not good. In Vancouver they have two young guys learning on the fly and they are not liabilities. Sure they make mistakes but they are dynamic players who are learning and will benefit from it. It's time for Buffalo to say goodbye to JG, who is a very nice guy but he isn't happy there and I know that from speaking with him. He didn't outright say it but his body language did and that's enough. Go with the younger kids and see what happens. Offensively, I believe the team should open it up more and go for goals, as opposed to trying not to get scored on. They have offensive talent and it's time to let them go a bit more. Maybe it's time for a top coach not one who inherited Sid, Malkin and Co. I know I'm rambling but something still isn't right there. But I'd start by looking for a true starter in net, or until then go with Nillson (although I didn't like the game winner) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) Lehner is tied for 15th in the league in save percentage. He's a starter. An average one, who is not worth a 1st round pick in a strong draft, but a starter nonetheless. One can be a starter without being a franchise goaltender. Edited January 18, 2017 by TrueBlueGED Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 I admit I don't get to watch of games out here on the West Coast but I do see lots of hi (low) lights. And it's very clear from my perch that Lehner is not a capable starter in the NHL. Backup, yes, but go to guy, no. Not by a long shot. Yes he's tough and has a fire in his belly but that doesn't stop shyte goals like Martin's goal against Toronto. That is the goal that breaks a team's back. The one that deflates them. The team also has too much dead weight. Too many slow, breaking down defencemen. I'd prefer the group get or use their best young D and let them get the experience. The team has 5 goals by defence this year. FIVE! 4 I believe are by #55 who is gonna be a beauty. The bottom 3 defence are old, slow and/or breaking down and that's not good. In Vancouver they have two young guys learning on the fly and they are not liabilities. Sure they make mistakes but they are dynamic players who are learning and will benefit from it. It's time for Buffalo to say goodbye to JG, who is a very nice guy but he isn't happy there and I know that from speaking with him. He didn't outright say it but his body language did and that's enough. Go with the younger kids and see what happens. Offensively, I believe the team should open it up more and go for goals, as opposed to trying not to get scored on. They have offensive talent and it's time to let them go a bit more. Maybe it's time for a top coach not one who inherited Sid, Malkin and Co. I know I'm rambling but something still isn't right there. But I'd start by looking for a true starter in net, or until then go with Nillson (although I didn't like the game winner) What kids do you want to play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 He lets in to many soft goals and can't stop a shootout to save his own life. I don't see him as our long term answer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Lehner is tied for 15th in the league in save percentage. He's a starter. An average one, who is not worth a 1st round pick in a strong draft, but a starter nonetheless. One can be a starter without being a franchise goaltender. His numbers have been just fine this year, if we're only looking at numbers. I think his actual gameplay has been below my standards. His numbers are good in spite of his actual performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 He's a starter, but we're not going to win a Stanley Cup with him as our no.1 goalie. So that was an awesome trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 His numbers have been just fine this year, if we're only looking at numbers. I think his actual gameplay has been below my standards. His numbers are good in spite of his actual performance. Oh, he's fugly to watch, that's for sure. And it may be that playing low event hockey protects some of his flaws. But if he keeps putting up league average numbers...don't we eventually have to let the numbers have their day? I remember watching Corey Crawford his first couple years as a starter, and every time I'd walk away thinking he was totally out of control, flopping all over the place, and would have to be replaced. Flunked my eye test entirely. Turns out not only didn't he have to be replaced, but he's actually good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Oh, he's fugly to watch, that's for sure. And it may be that playing low event hockey protects some of his flaws. But if he keeps putting up league average numbers...don't we eventually have to let the numbers have their day? I remember watching Corey Crawford his first couple years as a starter, and every time I'd walk away thinking he was totally out of control, flopping all over the place, and would have to be replaced. Flunked my eye test entirely. Turns out not only didn't he have to be replaced, but he's actually good. The numbers can have their day when I see how he looks under a competent coach and a system that actually works. But man is he ugly to watch. I won't like....be mad...if he disappears. I just have bigger fish to fry right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Lehner is tied for 15th in the league in save percentage. He's a starter. An average one, who is not worth a 1st round pick in a strong draft, but a starter nonetheless. One can be a starter without being a franchise goaltender. I'll concur with this, but only to the extent on his save %. Every starting goalie lets in a stinker now and then. The problem with Lehner is his are more than others and at game pivotal times. I have to agree with the UP here, he's not a starter we need and furthermore, a 1st for him and Legwand (a 1 year cap dump) was beyond over payment. It is my opinion Tim threw Uncle Bryan I real bone there. That in no way benefited Buffalo. The only saving grace is Petersen in the pipeline, and yet still a ? and years away. What a waste of assets. Just another testament to the gambling prowess of Tim Murray. To Tim: Tim, do yourself a favor, stay away from the casinos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 The numbers can have their day when I see how he looks under a competent coach and a system that actually works. But man is he ugly to watch. I won't like....be mad...if he disappears. I just have bigger fish to fry right now. Yea, I think there's a reasonable chance his flaws would be exposed in a different style of play. I'll concur with this, but only to the extent on his save %. Every starting goalie lets in a stinker now and then. The problem with Lehner is his are more than others and at game pivotal times. I have to agree with the UP here, he's not a starter we need and furthermore, a 1st for him and Legwand (a 1 year cap dump) was beyond over payment. It is my opinion Tim threw Uncle Bryan I real bone there. That in no way benefited Buffalo. The only saving grace is Petersen in the pipeline, and yet still a ? and years away. What a waste of assets. Just another testament to the gambling prowess of Tim Murray. To Tim: Tim, do yourself a favor, stay away from the casinos. Are they, though? Or do we just think they are because we see every one, and care about every one because it affects our team...whereas with other teams we neither see nor care about every weak goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Yea, I think there's a reasonable chance his flaws would be exposed in a different style of play. Are they, though? Or do we just think they are because we see every one, and care about every one because it affects our team...whereas with other teams we neither see nor care about every weak goal. Other teams play well enough to overcome the occasional weak goal. That's the difference. A weak goal against doesn't matter as much to those teams. Every weak goal against this team feels like an existential crisis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 Yea, I think there's a reasonable chance his flaws would be exposed in a different style of play. Are they, though? Or do we just think they are because we see every one, and care about every one because it affects our team...whereas with other teams we neither see nor care about every weak goal. True, as a team fan it is magnified to an extent beyond the other 29 clybs, I concede that. But I can think of a half dozen games (including a few shootouts but not limited to them) where Lehner had either killed the momentum or out right lost the game. I don't see him having success here in Buffalo given where the team is at this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAud Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 I'm always bewildered by the split discussion of whether he's a starter (of course he is, he's starting! I just saw it yesterday!), whether he's any good (15th in save % would indicate 'OK' with lots of opinions as to the quality of that performance) and whether the Sabres overpaid for him. As to the latter discussion...it's irrelevant in terms of assessing how good he is now or will be in the future. It's highly relevant in terms of assessing Tim Murray's performance. Both are fair topics of discussion but let's view his performance and future potential vs. other goaltenders real or imagined and not vs. whether he was traded along with Legwand for a late 1st round pick 1.5 years ago. At the time I felt like Murray slightly overpaid for Lehner but it wasn't outrageous. The guy had a great pedigree, size, had won a Calder Cup, and was only 24 years old. He was originally a 2nd round pick and had been progressing in his career so it's not like a late 1st rounder at that point was crazy. All goalies give up bad goals at times. I can't tell if his are any more frequent than other goalies. But if his overall save % is competitive, then so what? That would infer he makes a lot of tough saves as well to compensate. I'd rather bet on a guy reducing his soft goals through increased consistency and maturity than a guy who doesn't have top end skill. Nilsson played well last night but the 4th goal was somewhat soft too. Anderson won the game for the Leafs but completely blew the 1st goal to Okposo. It happens. The Sabres biggest problem is getting outshot and outchanced on a consistent basis, with one of the poorest goal scoring offenses in the league. In that environment every soft goal is doubly painful and emotionally stressful for fans as we know the team can't usually overcome it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsixspd Posted January 18, 2017 Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 He's ok - I don't see him as any real upgrade over other net minders we've had in the crease since Miller left. He's definitely not elite; just average (albeit shoot out and breakaways WAAAAY below average!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted January 19, 2017 Report Share Posted January 19, 2017 This is an article from Dave Davis with some other metrics to measure Lehner http://kuklaskorner.com/tso/comments/lehner-trade-hasnt-worked-out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBorn Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Lehner will be fine if he gets gts his sht together (particularly mentally). he actually could be a top 5 goalie one day eventually or very soon imo and i dont think he is very old...like 25? The goals that he does let in are garbage goals that can be corrected with positioning and better mental focus. basically saying the weak goals are correctable. first year as starter-young guy. be patient. also people need to respect his numbers more he is not bad. If a second round was traded for him i think consensus would be different. I will add, however, that if he continues to be relied on in shootouts and cant figure out how to stop the puck that is a MAJOR liability. In a way it almost invalidates from starter status, considering how precious pts are, especially for a team like the sabres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 yes he is our starter, Nilsson showed he isn't better. And unless Petersen or Ullmark show they are better, he'll be our starter for a while longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Lehner is not a starter, so your advocating having a starter like half of our D Bad trade of a pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) Is every anti-lehner poster required to mention GMTM overpaid 100 times in every thread. Yeah we get it. Find something else to bitch about. Edited January 20, 2017 by inkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) until he is off the team it is fair fodder and a number one goaltender is found. ps it is still thursday. Edited January 20, 2017 by North Buffalo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Is every anti-lehner poster required to mention GMTM overpaid 100 times in every thread. Yeah we ###### get it. Find something else to bitch about. Yes, we know, the truth hurts. Let it out, it's all going to be ok......there there now, let it out..... :O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppy22 Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Just one comment... The career of Devan Dubnyk Thanks everyone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Is every anti-lehner poster required to mention GMTM overpaid 100 times in every thread. Yeah we ###### get it. Find something else to bitch about.Horrible rebounds. The worst shootout goalie maybe in NHL history. Gets worse during a game with each goal he lets in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Is every anti-lehner poster required to mention GMTM overpaid 100 times in every thread. Yeah we ###### get it. Find something else to bitch about. Thank you, getting fed up to , you said it more nicely than I ever could :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted January 20, 2017 Report Share Posted January 20, 2017 Thank you, getting fed up to , you said it more nicely than I ever could :DBut But it was a Thursday... whhhyyyyyy???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.