sabredog Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Punch drunk Georges Laraque didn't he try to ruin Junior hockey a couple of years. As far as Kane goes if you don't get charged with anything you never done it but lets hang him anyway. And you wounder why you can't get ufa to go there. The meida is the problem. Hear say for makes a good story. When some hooker wants to take Jack for everything he's worth will we trade him to. Come on Buffalo prove him guilty of something first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Musichunch, there's your cue... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Eichel was indeed there that night. I don't believe Reinhart was. Eichel was in town for the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) They're both over 18 though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) FWIW Eichel was in Buffalo for The Bauer Draft Event held on the same day as the occurrence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Eichel was indeed there that night. Welp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Channeling my inner PA....it's also possible that Pegula is tired of off-ice incidents and would prefer to cut ties. Now, excuse me as I go shower with a flame thrower. Two SS Titans and struck me right in the funny bone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 They're both over 18 though? Sure. But how does one feel about the elite talent and future face of the franchise being at a nominally 18+ night with a DB like Kane on a night where a criminal complaint is lodged against said DB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) Sure. But how does one feel about the elite talent and future face of the franchise being at a nominally 18+ night with a DB like Kane on a night where a criminal complaint is lodged against said DB? I feel the Sabres are their employers not their nannies. Trading Kane won't stop them enjoying themselves and nothing would stop them seeing him in the offseason anyway. I bet they have both had a sip of beer too!! Eichel seems like a serious guy and Reinhart spent his year having extra practices of his own accord. I doubt going to a bar with Kane is going to derail their careers, and if it will then there is nothing the Sabres can do about it. Edited June 30, 2016 by ThirtyEight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) It's a comical image. The skeevy old degenerate bringing the two Boy Scouts through the front door, and the wide-eyed boys, changed and corrupted forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 It's a comical image. The skeevy old degenerate bringing the two Boy Scouts through the front door, and the wide-eyed boys, changed and corrupted forever. Just wait till one of them sees boobs for the first time!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Sure. But how does one feel about the elite talent and future face of the franchise being at a nominally 18+ night with a DB like Kane on a night where a criminal complaint is lodged against said DB? Yeaaaah. Normally, I wouldn't care if it's just one player doing what one player does, but if it turns out it's true that Kane brought Eichel and Reinhart along, I would stand behind any decision GMTM makes to jettison Kane. That's just not good for our young stars. Fortunately, if they were there, the lesson they learned was that Kane is a DB and acting like a DB gets you into super huge trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winston Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 My friend ran into Eichel at Encore on the night of the draft. He was there with.... ROR, our future captain and untradeable asset. Not that it even needs to be said. But if Eichel and/or Samson were at a bar or club with Kane, it's a pretty moot point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarasotaSabre Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 It's possible a trade has already been agreed upon, contingent on us signing Vesey though. that's a possibility plus a contingency; sounds like a real estate deal about to fall through....)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) Don't see how Murray could be upset at Kane for this. After all, he did say he wanted Kane to spend more time with his teammates :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 I feel the Sabres are their employers not their nannies. Trading Kane won't stop them enjoying themselves and nothing would stop them seeing him in the offseason anyway. I bet they have both had a sip of beer too!! Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not suggesting the Sabres are the players' nannies. Nor am I suggesting that Eichel is a stranger to having a few pops with the boys ("I'm comin' for ya, Buffalo!"). I am suggesting that Kane, under certain circumstances and possibly under the influence of certain substances, may be a genuinely not good guy, and that we may not want him socializing with the team's young stars. I doubt going to a bar with Kane is going to derail their careers, and if it will then there is nothing the Sabres can do about it. Nothing? How about trading him? Buying him out? Just wait till one of them sees boobs for the first time!! Not my point at all, in the event it were being implied it was. Don't see how Murray could be upset at Kane for this. After all, he did say he wanted Kane to spend more time with his teammates :P Right?! Remember that stuff from GM TM about how Kane needed to "open up" to these guys and enter into human relationship with them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not suggesting the Sabres are the players' nannies. Nor am I suggesting that Eichel is a stranger to having a few pops with the boys ("I'm comin' for ya, Buffalo!"). I am suggesting that Kane, under certain circumstances and possibly under the influence of certain substances, may be a genuinely not good guy, and that we may not want him socializing with the team's young stars. Nothing? How about trading him? Buying him out? Not my point at all, in the event it were being implied it was. Right?! Remember that stuff from GM TM about how Kane needed to "open up" to these guys and enter into human relationship with them? I'm just joking with you. I have no idea about Kane. By all accounts at the very least he is a 'complicated' person. My point is that if you don't want Kane mixing with your stars at all, then why did you trade for him? Murray works in the NHL, and it isn't like Kane's reputation for things didn't precede him. However, if the Sabres problem is that Kane took his teammates, who happen to be young stars, to a bar then the Sabres are in for a rough ride. Furthermore, it isn't like either of them has even hinted at being a Tyler Sequin-style character - and even then, we know how that trade turned out! - who needs to have the right people around him as he is too immature to be trusted alone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 rumour mill is cranking now: guy in my building just told me that it's being "reliably reported" (i.e., thrown around somewhere on Twitter) that the reason GM TM is done with E. Kane is because he brought Eichel and Reinhart to the Bottoms Up 18+ night in question. (i'm pretty sure Eichel is summering in Boston.) But was Vesey there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 My point is that if you don't want Kane mixing with your stars at all, then why did you trade for him? It was a calculated risk. One that appears at the risk of not working out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Fwiw, if you search on the Tweeter, it does appear that Eichel and Reinhart have previously attended other 18+ nights at Bottoms Up. (My search returned various drunk Tweets about seeing them at Bottoms Up from as long as ~400 days ago.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Fwiw, if you search on the Tweeter, it does appear that Eichel and Reinhart have previously attended other 18+ nights at Bottoms Up. (My search returned various drunk Tweets about seeing them at Bottoms Up from as long as ~400 days ago.) Phew, at least now i'll be able to sleep soundly tonight :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 I'll confess to being naive to the bar scene, especially the underage club scene. What is 18+ night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) I'll confess to being naive to the bar scene, especially the underage club scene. What is 18+ night? I think you're allowed in to mingle with the drunks with a wristband (or lack thereof) that identifies you as under 21. Edited June 30, 2016 by Claude_Verret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trettioåtta Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 I'll confess to being naive to the bar scene, especially the underage club scene. What is 18+ night? If its anything like a 16+ night here...it's interesting. Basically you allow underage people into the bar for the night but don't allow them to drink (wristbands usually identify those that are allowed to drink). They're usually rammed with two groups of people: 16/17 year olds who want to be grown up and grown ups who want 16/17 year olds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.