Jump to content

Cam Fowler Trade Speculation Thread

LGR4GM

By LGR4GM
in The Aud Club

 Share

Recommended Posts

LGR4GM Hall of Famer

LGR4GM

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm sure Anaheim is doing its best to remind GM TM of that.

 

Yeah.

 

I am reluctant to surrender the 8th, but am gonna be pissed if MTL gets the guy for the 9th.

Anaheim I think is trying to leverage Montreal to get more but Murray should value Fowler at X and then not be willing to spend more than X+ maybe a touch more for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrueBlueGED Hall of Famer

TrueBlueGED

Posted
Posted

Mortgaging the future by trading away top-10 picks is the exact thing that will place us in a perpetual rebuild. We may be great for the next 4-5 years, but what happens after that when we can't afford our players and the cupboards are bare? Blow it up again by trading off all our overpriced vets? We're going to need a steady stream of quality players.

Well, if we're great for 4-5 years, then the rebuild has in fact ended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thorny Hall of Famer

Thorny

Posted
Posted

Honestly, if you were a Ducks a fan would you be satisfied w/ Ennis or Girgensons + Pysyk for Fowler? 

 

Good point. 

 

And Fowler was drafted 54th overall. 

 

It could absolutely take 4 years for the #8 pick to be as good as Fowler but he also has the very real potential to be better than Fowler. The question is, is Fowler worth giving up that and something else like Zemgus or Ennis? 

 

Fowler was drafted 12th overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claude_Verret First Liner

Claude_Verret

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm sure Anaheim is doing its best to remind GM TM of that.

 

Yeah.

 

I am reluctant to surrender the 8th, but am gonna be pissed if MTL gets the guy for the 9th.

 

I don't doubt the Habs interest in Fowler, but part of their interest may be getting us to give up #8.

Edited by Claude_Verret
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LGR4GM Hall of Famer

LGR4GM

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Good point. 

 

 

Fowler was drafted 12th overall. 

And? Fowler was drafted 12th overall but I don't understand the point. oooo I meant Duncan Keith, sorry for the typo

I don't doubt the Habs interest in Fowler, but part of their interest may be getting us to give up #8.

I don't think the Habs will trade #9 because they need it. That team is light as hell on depth and their prospect department is just eh. 

Edited by LGR4GM
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Derrico First Liner

Derrico

Posted
Posted

And Fowler was drafted 54th overall. 

 

It could absolutely take 4 years for the #8 pick to be as good as Fowler but he also has the very real potential to be better than Fowler. The question is, is Fowler worth giving up that and something else like Zemgus or Ennis? 

What?  Fowler was drafted 12th overall......At the time people were surprised he lasted that long.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darksabre Hall of Famer

darksabre

Posted
Posted

Mortgaging the future by trading away top-10 picks is the exact thing that will place us in a perpetual rebuild. We may be great for the next 4-5 years, but what happens after that when we can't afford our players and the cupboards are bare? Blow it up again by trading off all our overpriced vets? We're going to need a steady stream of quality players.

 

Cam Fowler is 24 years old real NHL defenceman.

 

#8 overall is vaporware. 

 

Banking your future on one draft pick panning out is not smart. Better to have real players on the roster every time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thorny Hall of Famer

Thorny

Posted
Posted

I agree. I feel like if he was close to a deal and then Anaheim came back and said "hey montreal is giving us #9 so better up your offer" Murray would be grab his junk and flip them the bird and walk out. 

 

Great, and then we can sign Kris Russell, miss the playoffs, and everyone will complain that this year was supposed to be playoffs or bust :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thorny Hall of Famer

Thorny

Posted
Posted (edited)

And? Fowler was drafted 12th overall but I don't understand the point. oooo I meant Duncan Keith, sorry for the typo

I don't think the Habs will trade #9 because they need it. That team is light as hell on depth and their prospect department is just eh. 

 

The post I quoted, you said he was drafted 54th

 

Edit - oh ok, keith you meant

What?  Fowler was drafted 12th overall......At the time people were surprised he lasted that long.....

 

yup. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites
That Aud Smell Hall of Famer

That Aud Smell

Posted
Posted

If you could do so while wearing an O'Reilly jersey, that'd be swell.

 

I feel sort of badly for them -- those are not impressive digs from what I can see. Looks like a dog-eared conference room without a lot of modern amenities. Friend of mine has more second-tier FO guys (scouts, a couple analytic types) from an NHL club at his office's big conference room -- now that is a sweet-ass room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kas23 Second Liner

kas23

Posted
Posted

Well, if we're great for 4-5 years, then the rebuild has in fact ended.

True. But there's going to come a time when we have a lot of great vets that are going to be clamoring for huge contracts. What happens then? We'll have the unload them and I hope we have decent replacements in our system to fill the void. If we don't, we'll be heading for another rebuild. We can't let this team get too top heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rasmus_ Second Liner

Rasmus_

Posted
Posted

Comparing someone like Keith to a player like Fowler is asinine.  Keith went a time prior to analytics being a key to the business at hand.  He also had a so-so college career especially in his final season.  He was developed properly and exceeded every step of the way.  Fowler is a quality player, but at the right cost.  To me that is a non-starter with #8 involved.  I get the semantics of winning now, but over extending yourself on semantics is where you get away from long term vision with nearsightedness.  Stay the coarse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Derrico First Liner

Derrico

Posted
Posted

I haven't watched a ton of Fowler out west but from all the info I've gathered it sounds like he would be with Risto on our first pairing next season (unless we can pull off a blockbuster which I doubt we have the resources for).  In a couple of years when we're hopefully cup contenders we need this guy to be on our second pairing.  There's also the worry that his contract runs out in 2 years.  Therefore we would need him to re-up with us rather than going UFA.  Also, that's the year Sam and Jack will be due hefty raises. 

 

If Fowler had 4 years left on his deal I'm all in on giving up 8.  With only 2 years left I'm very hesitant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kas23 Second Liner

kas23

Posted
Posted

Cam Fowler is 24 years old real NHL defenceman.

 

#8 overall is vaporware.

 

Banking your future on one draft pick panning out is not smart. Better to have real players on the roster every time.

We definitely don't know what we're getting with #8, but I trust GMTM will pick the right one. What's even more vaporware is a pick in 20-30 range, which I hope where we'll be drafting for the foreseeable future. #8 is a unique situation I doubt we'll sniff for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...