Eleven Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Tough choice between Stamkos and Eichel. But I think I want to build a team that wins now and remains solid for a few years, so Stamkos it is. WildCard, you are on the clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 So my next picks are 32 and 33. Let's see what kind of handsome talent falls down to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I pick Taves, and changed the spelling of his stupid name. :lol: :lol: With the #8 overall pick, the BJ's select-Great 8, Alexander Ovechkin Surprised a multiple time Rocket Richard winner has fallen so low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 :lol: :lol: With the #8 overall pick, the BJ's select-Great 8, Alexander Ovechkin Surprised a multiple time Rocket Richard winner has fallen so low. I was really close, but center. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I was really close, but center. I do think Taves is a better player/more valuable than Ovechkin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I do think Taves is a better player/more valuable than Ovechkin. It makes me really uneasy whenever I read a scouting report comparing Samwise to Taves. A part of me wants to get wet, but mostly it just sounds like BS. I can see him becoming a shutdown scoring center, but his temperament and style strikes me as being more similar to Patrice Bergeron. I feel like Samson would have to take being a dick lessons from Steve Ott for a few years to become like Taves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 It makes me really uneasy whenever I read a scouting report comparing Samwise to Taves. A part of me wants to get wet, but mostly it just sounds like BS. I can see him becoming a shutdown scoring center, but his temperament and style strikes me as being more similar to Patrice Bergeron. I feel like Samson would have to take being a dick lessons from Steve Ott for a few years to become like Taves. I feel like Reinhart gets compared to Toews because they're both cerebral players and overshadowed by flashy counterparts. I don't know how physical Toews was to enter his career, or if Reinhart has anywhere near the leadership abilities Toews does, but comparing Sam to arguably the best Center in the league right now also makes me uneasy. And I'll admit I've been guilty of it, but the more I watch Toews the more impressed I am and the larger that gap gets between him and a likely expectation for Reinhart. I kinda think we have a Toews combination in Reinhart and Girgrensons mixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I pick Taves, and changed the spelling of his stupid name. Why change the spelling when you can simply changes the pronunciation to "toes"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Why change the spelling when you can simply changes the pronunciation to "toes"? Because nobody pronounces things on a message board. Thorny is on the clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Come on Thorny, I've got my pick in hand just waiting to give it to the Commish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Because nobody pronounces things on a message board. Thorny is on the clock. That's what would make it so great! It would be like a Seinfeld episode playing out in modern times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Come on Thorny, I've got my pick in hand just waiting to give it to the Commish. Ew. Ewwwwww. Gross. Ohhh.... "pick" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted May 11, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Tough choice between Stamkos and Eichel. But I think I want to build a team that wins now and remains solid for a few years, so Stamkos it is. WildCard, you are on the clock. Dudacek - your ranking idea is not sticking and was never the original intent of the topic. The original post called for a draft of all eligible nhl players with he purpose of swing where undrafted players might be taken with current stars. Eleven is the latest to reference building a team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Ew. Ewwwwww. Gross. Ohhh.... "pick" :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Ew. Ewwwwww. Gross. Ohhh.... "pick" :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Dudacek - your ranking idea is not sticking and was never the original intent of the topic. The original post called for a draft of all eligible nhl players with he purpose of swing where undrafted players might be taken with current stars. Eleven is the latest to reference building a team. See the thing is that a "superdraft" is about building a team. You must consider what the player will do for your team long-term. Otherwise it's just a "superranking." Eleven might not be drafting to build a team (meaning that he might not go after certain positions later) but he has to consider what a player means for a team and the amount of time they have left in the league. If you really want just a ranking of the best players in order then teams shouldn't have been assigned. This whole thing was rushed and poorly communicated. I don't even know what I'm actually doing at this point. Is it purely based on who they are right now (the answer must be yes if we're not considering any form of team building)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I thought it was a way to add a little entertainment to the original idea and that was to draft a team for right now. Originally it was who is the top 10. Not who could be the top 10, not who was the top 10. I didn't think 'draft' meant to build a team for the future, I figured 'draft' meant each of us got to choose one at a time who we think is the best of the remaining players. I'm picking based on current conditions as the original post implied. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I thought the OP was discussing who are the best players if you are building a team. Not who is the best player today. Otherwise the 2015 draft would not be included. Eichel is not the best player today but if I'm building a team today based on any NHL player I think Eichel is top 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 With an eye on what this player will do for our team in the short and long term, The San Jose Sharks select...From Boston University, Jack Eichel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 With a run on forwards to start the draft and knowing defence wins championships, the Colorado Avalanche select Shea weber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 Blue is on the clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I thought the OP was discussing who are the best players if you are building a team. Not who is the best player today. Otherwise the 2015 draft would not be included. Eichel is not the best player today but if I'm building a team today based on any NHL player I think Eichel is top 10. I want my team to win right now. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrico Posted May 11, 2015 Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 I want my team to win right now. :D I wanted Eichel it!!!!! I almost took doughty due to age haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted May 12, 2015 Report Share Posted May 12, 2015 Well this is easy: Tyler Seguin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted May 12, 2015 Report Share Posted May 12, 2015 (edited) Here's the draft so far: EDIT: Up to date list as requested: 1. WildCard (Buffalo) - Patrick Kane 2. Randall Flagg (Arizona) - Connor McDavid 3. Liger (Edmonton) - John Tavares 4. JJ (Toronto) - Corey Perry 5. Qwksndmonster (Carolina) - Jonathan Toews 6. Dudacek (New Jersey) - Sidney Crosby 7. Eleven (Philly) - Steven Stamkos 8. WildCard (Columbus) - Alexander Ovechkin 9. Thorny (San Jose) - Jack Eichel 10. Derrico (Colorado) - Shea Weber 11. TrueBlue (Florida) - Tyler Seguin Whisky is on the clock. Then 3Putt and Taro, and two from Ubkev. I'll keep an updated list in my post at the top of page 3 for reference. With an eye on what this player will do for our team in the short and long term, The San Jose Sharks select...From Boston University, Jack Eichel. Interesting one. If you think he is Tavares or Stamkos, it's warranted. (Wouldn't that be nice?) Edited May 12, 2015 by dudacek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.