FearTheReaper Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 whiner That is awesome. :thumbsup: On a side note,why does Crosby attempt to grow facial hair during the playoffs? He clearly cannot grow a beard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 What are the chances that versus does something right and shows the national anthems live on tv? The US anthem in Chicago is UNREAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 What are the chances that versus does something right and shows the national anthems live on tv? The US anthem in Chicago is UNREAL. That was a big fat NO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpandean Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Heartbreaker for Detroit. Hossa, who has been held pointless in the playoffs, seemingly bangs home a loose puck to tie it up with 1:04 left. But, no, the ref thought the puck was under Hiller and whistled it dead. Of course, he didn't actually get the whistle to his mouth to blow it dead before the puck was hit in, but in his mind, he had made the decision, so no goal. Ducks win 2-1 to take a 2-1 lead in the series. Not sure how I feel about that rule. They could certainly say that if, after review, the puck was determined to be loose and that it went in before the whistle blows, then it can be overturned. That first part could get tricky, though, when the puck is sort of covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwcolour Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Heartbreaker for Detroit. Hossa, who has been held pointless in the playoffs, seemingly bangs home a loose puck to tie it up with 1:04 left. But, no, the ref thought the puck was under Hiller and whistled it dead. Of course, he didn't actually get the whistle to his mouth to blow it dead before the puck was hit in, but in his mind, he had made the decision, so no goal. Ducks win 2-1 to take a 2-1 lead in the series. Not sure how I feel about that rule. They could certainly say that if, after review, the puck was determined to be loose and that it went in before the whistle blows, then it can be overturned. That first part could get tricky, though, when the puck is sort of covered. Either way someone may get screwed... but I feel if the puck is "sort of covered" it might as well not be covered at all. The RWings got screwed hard on that, but a rule is a rule. In any sport I think it should be play until the whistle... not play until the ref makes up his mind he wants to blow the whistle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Wings Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Heartbreaker for Detroit. Hossa, who has been held pointless in the playoffs, seemingly bangs home a loose puck to tie it up with 1:04 left. But, no, the ref thought the puck was under Hiller and whistled it dead. Of course, he didn't actually get the whistle to his mouth to blow it dead before the puck was hit in, but in his mind, he had made the decision, so no goal. Ducks win 2-1 to take a 2-1 lead in the series. Not sure how I feel about that rule. They could certainly say that if, after review, the puck was determined to be loose and that it went in before the whistle blows, then it can be overturned. That first part could get tricky, though, when the puck is sort of covered. Imagine you're the referee in this case..... You see the scramble and the puck go under Hiller and begin to move your hand to your mouth to blow the whistle, but then see the puck cross the line. Do you stop yourself and call it a goal? I realize this all happens in a split second and you probably couldn't change your mind THAT quickly, but.....? This is really a tough spot to be in if you're the ref. You can't let the play go too long, but you want to be 100% sure the puck is covered/controlled by the goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudz Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 At some point you have to help the goalie too, because he can have the puck trapped and still have it wacked out. Even though Detroit was screwed and I'd be pissed as a fan, I agree with the call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cereal Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 At some point you have to help the goalie too, because he can have the puck trapped and still have it wacked out. Even though Detroit was screwed and I'd be pissed as a fan, I agree with the call. Exactly. Definitely the right call, but sucks for Detroit. Imagine how much we'd all be complaining if that happened to the Sabres? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Exactly. Definitely the right call, but sucks for Detroit. Imagine how much we'd all be complaining if that happened to the Sabres? This place would be going apeshit if it happened to the Sabres. I'm just shocked that it happened to another team in the playoffs before it bit the Sabres. I am fully confident however that if and when the Sabres make the playoffs again the screwings will continue as per usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted May 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Exactly. Definitely the right call, but sucks for Detroit. Imagine how much we'd all be complaining if that happened to the Sabres? How about not "definitely" the right call, but, well, that was the call. It's fun to observe this crap without the Sabres involved for once. Or, it's another manifestation of the "anti-Detroit bias" that we all know the league has, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted May 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Oh, Pittsburgh! Not so easy...2-2 on another nifty Ovechkin play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matter2003 Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pittsburgh back in the series 2-1 and Jokkinen puts the Canes up 2-1...I can't stand them---please don't let them get to the finals again... Both overtime games tonite... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted May 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Damn, I'm not very happy with either result. I guess there will be a place to complain about it tomorrow, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 What a classic game from the Igloo. Good win for Pittsburgh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpandean Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Damn, I'm not very happy with either result. I guess there will be a place to complain about it tomorrow, though. Me neither. I am really tempted now to dig up my Jussi Jokinen thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Me neither. I am really tempted now to dig up my Jussi Jokinen thread. lol Im not too happy with Carolina winning either. I just can not stand their fans. I don't care if i'm bitter or what not, i just had one too many bad experiences with their fan base and can not stand several of their current players. But, i'm glad Pittsburgh won. I am hoping that Hockey wins in that series. i don't care which team advances though. I would like to see Washington move on but i could live with either. But hockey is on the spotlight and could be the big winner and thats why i am hoping that series goes 7 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearTheReaper Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pittsburgh's Ot winner was bull. It bounced off of Morisonn. I cant stand bounces like that.It would of been better if there was a goal after Malkins nifty move rather than a bouncer. Regardless i figured Pitt would win tonight in front of the home crowd. And up until the Ot winner they were the better team. Kudos to the Caps for coming back late in the third. I still pick the Caps in this series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pittsburgh's Ot winner was bull. It bounced off of Morisonn. I cant stand bounces like that.It would of been better if there was a goal after Malkins nifty move rather than a bouncer. Regardless i figured Pitt would win tonight in front of the home crowd. And up until the Ot winner they were the better team. Kudos to the Caps for coming back late in the third. I still pick the Caps in this series. Malkin after a 'quiet' two games was all over the ice last night. He was dangling everywhere. That was probably the best skating performance I've seen in a very, very, very long time. OV is just an awesome hockey player. A tough-as-nail forward. Both Crosby and OV took crunching, de-skating hits last night. What a fantastic series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Wings Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pittsburgh back in the series 2-1 and Jokkinen puts the Canes up 2-1...I can't stand them---please don't let them get to the finals again... Both overtime games tonite... Two classic, tightly-played playoff games, at that. So far, I'm not upset with the games I've seen. I really think the NHL would benefit from the Bruins winning this series, though. One of the original six and a big market playing either Washington or Pittsburgh would give the league a very good amount of exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Pittsburgh back in the series 2-1 and Jokkinen puts the Canes up 2-1...I can't stand them---please don't let them get to the finals again...Both overtime games tonite... I don't think anyone hates the Canes organization and fan base more than me, but at least this time around they deserve to be in the position they are in. They aren't backing their way towards the Cup like in '06. I'm never going to wish injury on anyone but if there was ever a team due for a stretch of bad fortune it's the Canes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 Malkin after a 'quiet' two games was all over the ice last night. He was dangling everywhere. That was probably the best skating performance I've seen in a very, very, very long time. OV is just an awesome hockey player. A tough-as-nail forward. Both Crosby and OV took crunching, de-skating hits last night. What a fantastic series. Great article from the Buffalo News today about Malkin's game, from John Vogl, who is actually in Pittsburgh covering the series- http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/663413.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Be careful people http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=ap-o...p&type=lgns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted May 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Be careful peoplehttp://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=ap-o...p&type=lgns WOW. You know what, if you (I don't mean you, spndnchz, necessarily) ever think about reaching that level, please do it on another board. We're looking at you, SDS; you're always near that line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 The Blackhawks make me tingly inside. :wub: I think if there were a team's bandwagon I would jump on, the Hawks would be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 I didn't think Ovechkin should have gotten a penalty for that. He was trying to hit the guy and Gonchar tried avoiding his hit and they hit knee on knee by accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.