spndnchz Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I'm going with 69. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two or less Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I voted +71. I really think he'll be healthy for the first time for a full season. (mostly full) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Less than 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmwolf21 Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I really don't know. I voted 36-52, but I wouldn't be surprised with either a 60-game or 20-game season. I do think that if he gets caught once with his head down, it's probably career over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I'm going with 69. :thumbsup: And I don't even need to buy you a drink first? Nice! I voted 71+, but I'm an optimist. And it's a contract year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 37 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I'm down for 53-70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I'm thinking 30-35. Next time his bell gets rung, he's gone for good, but he also gets stress fractures from conditioning training, and back spasms from pre-season games and camp? I sure hope Darcy's working the phones as we speak, but knowing Darcy I'd say that's a big fat "no way". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 He'll play 65-70. 80 pts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I'll go with 98 :worthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMIRNOFF Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 46 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R_Dudley Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I selected the 53-70,,,, with the caveat if he gets's 1st-2nd line minutes risk goes up and games go down to 48-53, if minutes are more like 3rd-4th line then we sqweak 65-70 games outta him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesportsbuff Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 74 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Connolly's going to play about 75 games. I know, call me crazy, but I think this will be a good year for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swedesessed Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 I'll go with 98 :worthy: nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_otto Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 40 /crosses fingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted September 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 I'm thinking 30-35. Next time his bell gets rung, he's gone for good, but he also gets stress fractures from conditioning training, and back spasms from pre-season games and camp? I sure hope Darcy's working the phones as we speak, but knowing Darcy I'd say that's a big fat "no way". This brings up the other caveat. What if: we package Connolly AND max (notice CAP lock off)to another team for the vet center we always wanted. do we have enough to back up the winger/center loss? Again , both contract expiring players, at the deadline, yada yada... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmwolf21 Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 He'll play 65-70. 80 pts. Really? Averaging 1.14 -1.23 points per game when his career high is .87? That's going out on a limb there, Sherpa... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 42.33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 23.32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Really? Averaging 1.14 -1.23 points per game when his career high is .87? That's going out on a limb there, Sherpa... 1.38 in the 05-06 playoffs. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbochan Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 I went with 36-52, figuring about 40 or so, with (hopefully) about 35 points. He's STILL skating with his head down and it's going to get him clobbered. Players dream of catching someone as good as him skating like that. :censored: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROC Sabres Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Put me down for 55 games. Just need to make sure this thread doesn't disappear until after april. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom webster Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 I voted 52 to 70. As much as I rag on him for his injuries, I expect him to play through some pain this year. On the other hand, I don't think he is as good as that 8 game stretch in the playoffs before Ottawa knocked him out. I see 65 games, 50 points and somebody else playing the second line pivot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.