All Activity
- Past hour
-
Y’all were told the only successful course of action was trading Byram for offense. Which could still happen. Unfortunately, WGR and Sabres Twitter mandated that it was the only path to success. Now, just like the WR situation with the Bills, things took a turn in a different direction and we are calling it a failure based on predetermined expectations set by outside influences.
-
I would say yes. If the GM couldn't get a fair-value return for him in a trade, then it made sense for the player and the franchise to stay here. With him, our blue line unit is more than solid, it can be quite good. Of course, there is an assumption that Power will advance as a player and that Samuelsson stabilizes his game. What this short-term deal is give the franchise more time to seek better options if they arise. There are a lot of things to criticize our GM for, but not for how he handled the Byram situation.
-
The offseason so far - Are the Sabres better?
JohnC replied to GASabresIUFAN's topic in The Aud Club
Why did the coach ride JJP? It surely wasn’t because he was responding to what the coach/es were telling him. So an old school coach coached like an old school coach. Big freaking deal! The player couldn’t handle it. I’m not suggesting that JJP is a bad fellow. What’s obvious is that he wasn’t as receptive to coaching and as resilient as he needed to be. In the end, the player made it clear that he wanted out, and got out. He was traded for players that filled other needs. What this backwater franchise doesn’t need is lingering dissatisfaction in a room already filled with a lot of existing frustrations. - Today
-
There are a lot of ifs involved in this team hitting its ceiling. We all see it and all we can do is hope. They need to come out of blocks strong and get points early when teams are getting their legs and figuring things out. Once mid season hits and teams start grinding for playoff spots the Sabres “softness” will be exposed.
-
Goaltending could very well be better, they added a guy who might help out a lot, we shall see. JJP gets replaced by Norris and added production by up and comers. The defense is better The team is another year older. I seriously doubt this team will fold with the lead like last years team did at start of last season. I'd be very surprised if we see them losing games again after taking leads into third period where other team just runs over them.
-
I don't know hockey well enough to have an established opinion here, so I come asking questions, not stating facts: Is the NHL clsoer to MLB, where you need a robust farm system to have any chance at succeeding? Or is like the NFL/NBA, where you can cycle guys out every offseason and totally revamp the team, but as long as one or 2 superstars are anchoring your roster, you will be fine? I ask, because to the totally uninformed (me), it seems like the Sabres are riiiiiiiiight there. You look at their 20 game splits over the last 3 seasons, and they basically play like a top 5 Eastern conference team for quarter-season stretches, and then a last place team for (more) quarter-season stretches. At each point in the last 3 years tough, they have spent at least a quarter of a season playing on a heater, including the end of last season. In other sports, that's indicative of a young team finding its footing and learning how to win. I ask my original question because it colors my outlook on this team: If the entire farm system needed to be rebuilt from the ground-up to get a pipeline of talent coming in that can get the team "over the hump"... to the uninformed, it would seem like they're very close to getting over that hump. If that's not at all how success is attained in this league, and it's closer to the NFL/NBA, where we're basically just treadmilling in the 10 spot with uneven play, and have a GM that won't plop down the cash to get the team over the hump, and what ACTUALLY needs to happen is trading away the farm(system) to get expensive talent that Terry won't pay for because a new stadium is being built for Josh, then I'll plan on giving up on the Sabres again this year before Thanksgiving.
-
Too many things involved to not think Trump is a disgusting human being. "He likes them on the younger side" https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/ I love that Trump has a big mouth b.c it makes this so much easier.
-
Im not singling out your comment alone, more the attitude currently of the sabres fanbase because it is interesting to me. The team sucks, but we want to extend everyone to long term deals? We can't trade peterka because he's going to be a superstar? We need to spend to the cap, but who are we going to spend the money on? After like a day of free agency Jeff Skinner was one of the best free agents left. The way I see it, Byram is currently dman 3 or 4 with warts that the analytic community is quick to point out. But hes still super young too. A 2 year deal still gives you leverage to sign or do a sign and trade next year. I'd think the last thing all parties would want is a 5+ year deal.
-
Frog legs for dinner at Indabuff’s house!
-
The offseason so far - Are the Sabres better?
Weave replied to GASabresIUFAN's topic in The Aud Club
You completely wiffed on my use of the word defensive.