The Jokeman Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: If he is contributing in year 2 then keep him. If he leaves in UFA but you made the playoffs, sweet, we made the playoffs. Yes, I want to see us make the playoffs but we better have the forethought that one year in the playoffs and then out because lose guys in UFAs is poor management. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: Yes, I want to see us make the playoffs but we better have the forethought that one year in the playoffs and then out because lose guys in UFAs is poor management. teams lose guys to UFA all the time, Buffalo just never replaces them 1 2 Quote
The Jokeman Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: teams lose guys to UFA all the time, Buffalo just never replaces them See JJP. But I know I know you feel we won't miss his production. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, The Jokeman said: See JJP. But I know I know you feel we won't miss his production. we didnt lose him in ufa Quote
The Jokeman Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Just now, LGR4GM said: we didnt lose him in ufa Fine but we didn't replace him IMO. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Jacob Bryson is so bad that in 39mins with Dahlin at 5v5, he manages to tank Dahlin's numbers by a lot. 50.62cf%, 44.14xgf%, 35.29hdcf% Dahlin with literally anyone else 56.72cf%, 55.16xgf%, 56.79hdcf% 3 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Looking over these numbers, if Power doesn't play with Samuelsson and Bryson for about 1/3 of the season minutes, he might have actually not been total *****. He wouldn't have been good but he at least wouldn't have been hot trash. Power in 318mins at 5v5 with Mattias Samuelsson: 45.73cf%, 40.75xgf%, 51.85gf%, 37.62hdcf% and the only reason they don't look worse is they had a .918sv% saving their *****. Owen Power with anyone besides Bryson and Samuelsson: 53.64cf%, 52.43xgf%, 45.31gf%, 48.7hdcf%, and a 0.892sv% as the goalie was pooooooooo Edited 7 hours ago by LGR4GM 2 Quote
Flashsabre Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 10 hours ago, Second Line Center said: It’s definitely not. Norris. Lyon. Kesselring. Timmins. Doan. Year 2 for Zucker and McCleod. If Norris stays healthy. If Kulich, Benson, and Quinn (15 points last 16 games of season) continue to develop. Maybe one of the other kids makes a leap. If Power suddenly starts reaching his potential. And the Goaltending can just be average. Why aren’t we a playoff contender? 80-85 points should be this group’s floor. Just trying to be optimistic here. Getting Tuch to sign is now top priority. Because this is year 6 of this clown being in charge and all he has built is: ”well if all these players breakthrough maybe we have a chance at the playoffs.” Not even remotely good enough. Edited 7 hours ago by Flashsabre 4 Quote
Eleven Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 4 hours ago, LGR4GM said: So which one of you memesters can get rid of the text for me so that I can use it as a template? I'm thinking "to the pain" to start. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Flashsabre said: Because this is year 6 of this clown being in charge and all he has built is: ”well if all these players breakthrough maybe we have a chance at the playoffs.” Not even remotely good enough. But what if UPL plays the way he did in that one 30 game stretch that he hasn't shown before or since? What if Jiri Kulich is actually the 2nd coming of idk... some 35g, 40a type of center? What if Norris plays all 82 games? "Hope is a ***** strategy" as our friend Zucker said. Quote
kas23 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: Speaking of Greenway... he's basically JAG and idk why they gave him 2 years unless he's one of the vet leaders in that locker room. He gives you no offense really and just a minor level of defense. I’ve never liked Greenway. I think people like the idea of a big rough player. But he’s not a difference maker and is usually injured. He’s basically the Samuelsson of the forwards. 1 Quote
triumph_communes Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Team plays with more mojo with Greenway is out there. We’re reaching critical mass of players with that sort of effect. Bryson being the remaining total drag out there. Samuelsson is minimized. Power and Byrams faults is they play without bite and teams get cocky then they get lost chasing. A few more finished checks here and there and teams don’t try that ***** as much. But the flow falls apart as they’re covering for so many weaknesses. its at the point where Dahlin doesn’t play offense like he should be because he’s covering so much. If we traded out Byram the defense is just too thin. We’re better for it for two years. get a forward who actually forechecks with grit on every line and defenseman who don’t skate circles and the whole game gets easier for everyone Optimism comes from the mix being changed. You can still have some skill guys but they can’t be a majority; everyone can’t play the perimeter only one Edited 6 hours ago by triumph_communes 1 Quote
Doohickie Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Eleven said: So which one of you memesters can get rid of the text for me so that I can use it as a template? I'm thinking "to the pain" to start. Go to a meme generator page such as https://imgflip.com/memegenerator and see if the gif is uploaded without the text. This one is pretty close: https://imgflip.com/memetemplate/320298782/Princess-Bride-Land-War-in-Asia-gif It has a caption but you can put a bigger caption over it. Quote
Eleven Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Doohickie said: Go to a meme generator page such as https://imgflip.com/memegenerator and see if the gif is uploaded without the text. This one is pretty close: https://imgflip.com/memetemplate/320298782/Princess-Bride-Land-War-in-Asia-gif It has a caption but you can put a bigger caption over it. Yeah but I want the Byram pic. Quote
LabattBlue Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Cackling Brian Duff making it seem like the Sabres aren’t spending out of the ordinary on the blueline. I’d like to know how many teams have a top 3 blueline cap hit greater than the Sabres(25.6mil)? I bet…not many, if any. Edited 6 hours ago by LabattBlue 1 Quote
Doohickie Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Eleven said: Yeah but I want the Byram pic. You can log onto imgflp with your Google ID if you have one (I think some others too) and use that to create an account. Then you can upload pics or gifs as templates. It's how I make the goal memes. 1 Quote
Eleven Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Doohickie said: You can log onto imgflp with your Google ID if you have one (I think some others too) and use that to create an account. Then you can upload pics or gifs as templates. It's how I make the goal memes. Ah ok I will try to work on this tonight. Welcome to the 2010s, Eleven! 2 1 1 Quote
dudacek Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 3 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Cackling Brian Duff making it seem like the Sabres aren’t spending out of the ordinary on the blueline. I’d like to know how many teams have a top 3 blueline cap hit greater than the Sabres(25.6mil)? I bet…not many, if any. You get the concept that the Power and Dahlin contracts are specifically designed to be overpays in the early years and bargains at the ends? With that in mind, simple math says 7D, 23 roster spots equals about 30% of the cap on blueliners. So with a cap of $95.5M, the median would be around $29M on your D corps this year. The Sabres are currently spending $33M, which will jump a bit (probably less than a million) when Timmins signs and Jones gets sent down. Would agree that they are probably close to the high-end in terms of top 3, which shouldn’t be a surprise given that all 3 signed relatively recently, all 3 carry the pedigree of being the 1st defencemen taken in their draft year, and 2 of the 3 are getting paid for UFA years. Quote
K-9 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 5 hours ago, gilbert11 said: “That’s the fact, Jack!” 1 Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago Just ok, he should have been long dealt by now and each of or lines RHD should have gotten upgraded defensively by either UFA or through trade. Kesselering was solid but Timmins is average at best from everything I’ve read on him and Byram is know more as an offensive defenseman. Are we any better off than last season defensively? Doubtful. Quote
LabattBlue Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 15 minutes ago, dudacek said: You get the concept that the Power and Dahlin contracts are specifically designed to be overpays in the early years and bargains at the ends? With that in mind, simple math says 7D, 23 roster spots equals about 30% of the cap on blueliners. So with a cap of $95.5M, the median would be around $29M on your D corps this year. The Sabres are currently spending $33M, which will jump a bit (probably less than a million) when Timmins signs and Jones gets sent down. Would agree that they are probably close to the high-end in terms of top 3, which shouldn’t be a surprise given that all 3 signed relatively recently, all 3 carry the pedigree of being the 1st defencemen taken in their draft year, and 2 of the 3 are getting paid for UFA years. …and despite all that hype, the blueline is meh…on their best day. Quote
Taro T Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: …and despite all that hype, the blueline is meh…on their best day. You have one of the 5 best D in the entire league eating up 26 minutes. On their best day, this D is far from 'meh.' Fix the coaching and maybe it's better than 'meh' on an average day. 2 Quote
LabattBlue Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Taro T said: You have one of the 5 best D in the entire league eating up 26 minutes. On their best day, this D is far from 'meh.' Fix the coaching and maybe it's better than 'meh' on an average day. Last time I looked the coaches aren’t on the ice during the game. I get it…they could replace him, but would it improve blueline play on the ice? Who knows? Quote
Taro T Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Last time I looked the coaches aren’t on the ice during the game. I get it…they could replace him, but would it improve blueline play on the ice? Who knows? YES, it would improve the blueline play on the ice. 100%. It would change the way they practice. It would change the skills they're working on in practice. It would alter the empahsis of how they play in games. Send him and Appert into the sun and replace them with COMPETENT coaches and the team wins absolutely minimum 4 more games. From a baseline of 85 points. Now 93 points doesn't get you there typically (though it would've at least 2 of the last 3 years); but even if that doesn't get you there. How much puckluck does it take to go from 93 to 96-98 points? A heck of a lot less than it does to go from 85 to 96-98. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.