Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, LGR4GM said:

Would be ***** peak Kevyn Adams to trade Quinn and more for Rossi.

I know why you say this with how the draft went down and how their careers have begun but Marco is much more of a certainty at this point and Mattias / Isak aren’t assets the Sabres need. 

Posted

Aren't you a little short to be a stormtrooper win a faceoff?

Rossi is good; his potential is still not reached.

I'm just wondering why yet another 23 year-old who isn't a superstar or powerplay savant...    and hasn't shown any veteran grind, long playoff-run, relentless tenacity, holding-others-accountable, being a punk to play against, angst-at-the-world fervor makes sense for this roster at forward.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, The Jokeman said:

and this has what exactly to do with Marco Rossi?

Ok I will elaborate ... the title said the "Sabres interested in Marco Rossi..."  my response was Yes I am interested in Carrie Underwood too...  the dripping sarcastic innuendo is that they have as much likelihood in getting Marco Rossi as I do Carrie Underwood...  essentially saying, I dont believe us getting Marco Rossi is likely to happen.   

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

I want Adams to trade for a 5'9" center so bad, just to watch this place lose their *****. 

And lineup Benson-Rossi to take the opening face off of next season.😛. Minny want a bigger centre. I would offer broken Norris for him in a heartbeat. I have no faith Norris plays regularly next season.

Edited by Flashsabre
Posted
2 minutes ago, Flashsabre said:

And lineup Benson-Rossi to take the opening face off of next season.😛. Minny want a bigger centre. I would offer broken Norris for him in a heartbeat. I have no faith Norris plays regularly next season.

I actually or oddly enough, have faith in Norris. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

I actually or oddly enough, have faith in Norris. 

I think he’s a good player he just always seems injured.  If he can stay healthy great but IDK.  If they could acquire Rossi with other pieces and go:

Norris

Rossi

McLeod

Krebs

down the middle that is not bad at all.

Posted
1 hour ago, DarthEbriate said:

Aren't you a little short to be a stormtrooper win a faceoff?

Rossi is good; his potential is still not reached.

I'm just wondering why yet another 23 year-old who isn't a superstar or powerplay savant...    and hasn't shown any veteran grind, long playoff-run, relentless tenacity, holding-others-accountable, being a punk to play against, angst-at-the-world fervor makes sense for this roster at forward.

Yeah, as much as I like collecting more talent, this isn’t the droid we should be looking for.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

I actually or oddly enough, have faith in Norris. 

Me too!

 

Norris is so talented. Remember everyone thought Byram was injury prone and then he plays 82 games for us this year, I know his injury history is a risk, but he is an extremely talented player that once people start to see what he brings, no one will be upset with that trade anymore

1 hour ago, DarthEbriate said:

Aren't you a little short to be a stormtrooper win a faceoff?

Rossi is good; his potential is still not reached.

I'm just wondering why yet another 23 year-old who isn't a superstar or powerplay savant...    and hasn't shown any veteran grind, long playoff-run, relentless tenacity, holding-others-accountable, being a punk to play against, angst-at-the-world fervor makes sense for this roster at forward.

Now i thought Rossi had high end compete and was labeled as a poop disturber coming into his draft year? Am i not correct on this?

 

I dont exactly remember all I know I was screaming Rossi at the tv when we picked Quinn

Posted
5 minutes ago, ponokasabre said:

Now i thought Rossi had high end compete and was labeled as a poop disturber coming into his draft year? Am i not correct on this?

I dont exactly remember all I know I was screaming Rossi at the tv when we picked Quinn

200' player, engaged defensively, and ever around-the-puck -- yes, yes, and yes. Stirrer and pest making life miserable for opponents and getting under their skin? No. Theoren Fleury, Esa Tikkanen, Marchand he was and is not.

Posted

Here's the thing, you trade for Rossi, Rosen and Östlund are basically redundant pieces here now. Rosen already is but, and ik some of you will be shocked, you can't run a forward group of 5'11" forwards. It's just not gonna work. 

You can fit Rossi and Benson on the roster and Helenius has a chance but adding Östlund and Rosen... meh. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, xzy89c1 said:

Samuelson, with that contract and injury history, is untradeable. Would you want him? Long term commitment to a guy who will be available half the time and soft as a marshmallow the rest of the time.

I'm in agreement.  I'm not saying he has no value, but I don't think he can be traded.  We'd have to give up picks and or prospects to get someone to take on his contract, IMO 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...