Jump to content

Is Adams Serious About Winning?


GASabresIUFAN

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, seer775 said:

So it's settled. Neither our GM nor our Owner want to build a successful hockey franchise. 

Leave it to the player to void their contract if they don't want to play. We literally handed Reinhart, Ullmark, and Eichel to winning teams for nothing in return. What sane person would do that?

You're flat out wrong here and we're sick of your lies. Ullmark was an ufa. Reinhart and Eichel netted returns, stop lying. This isn't some ***** reddit forum or WGR where we don't know wtf happened. 

Stop posting this garbage. 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

You're flat out wrong here and we're sick of your lies. Ullmark was an ufa. Reinhart and Eichel netted returns, stop lying. This isn't some ***** reddit forum or WGR where we don't know wtf happened. 

Stop posting this garbage. 

Prove me wrong. What did we get back for two 500 point players? A middle-6 winger and some draft picks? And where's the 1A goalie? Oh yeah, starting for the Bruins.

This ownership sucks donkey balls. To deny that is to deny the truth as we have been humiliated time and time again for a dozen years. There is no hope for this franchise as long as Pegula is at the helm.

Might as well cheer for the Leafs. They are one playoff series win ahead of us in 17 years. We will continue to develop young hockey talent and so generously deliver them to serious hockey teams practically free of charge.

Edited by seer775
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, thewookie1 said:

we made a promise to Levi about not blocking him and giving him an opportunity to be our starter

It certainly seems as if Adams himself is very much aware of this and has made attempts to fix the issue.  

they certainly point to Adams knowing of and trying to fix the issue.

We aren’t happy with what he ended up trying but it had its merits.

In theory an ok bandaid for the D core when imagining continued progression.

Now Adams is sort of trapped defensively for this season.

The emergence of R. Johnson gives him no wiggle room.

Unless your on a Cup team, GMs of all other teams would be extremely unlikely to play with either of those scenarios.

He’s more or less handcuffed to this D group by proper etiquette 

Complimentary pieces are honestly a crap shoot.

I didn’t feel bad about them bringing back the group wholesale.

Perhaps I’m sentimental but I really wanted Okposo to hit game 1000 and Girgs to be here for a playoff berth for his years of hard work. 

poor Kevyn Adams

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he wants to win. Last year went in some ways better than expected, and that messed up the "plan". Tages new contract was a success then, and that made Adams confident in handing out new, long contracts to several other. He could have made cheaper contracts by keeping his head cool. 

He did sign EJ and CC and I tought he did okey, they seemed like good additions by then. The defense needed an upgrade. Well, he has to make another move now! The face offs was another problem, do not know if he even tried to solve that.

Just guessing, but I think that before Devon Levi made his debut last spring, the plan was to get a veteran goaltender in the summer to pair with UPL, and keeping Levi in AHL. But Levi was so damn good, so he taught he could save some money. He should have stayed with the plan.

And since their magnificent scoring from last season has disappeared and there has not been any progress on the defensive game, Kevyn Adams has to make a new plan.

Many fans seem to be asking for a trade, I just do not really know who to trade for that A) would not be a expensive rental, B) would like to play in Buffalo? But they have a lot to offer in a trade on the other hand.

I have never liked it when the coach is the one who have to go when the players do not play well, but in this case I think Granatos contract extension is the biggest misstake made. There are no progress on any areas. But they could change the assistans coaches also.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thorny said:

poor Kevyn Adams

Merely telling you as I see it; I don't exactly feel bad for Adams but I can sympathize based on what we do know. What good does it do to just stomp our feet and whine about Kevyn not doing something if we give no context. It would be like blaming a person trying to buy a computer at a Best Buy on Black Friday who chooses not to because none of the deals made sense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

Merely telling you as I see it; I don't exactly feel bad for Adams but I can sympathize based on what we do know. What good does it do to just stomp our feet and whine about Kevyn not doing something if we give no context. It would be like blaming a person trying to buy a computer at a Best Buy on Black Friday who chooses not to because none of the deals made sense.

The Sabres finished 25th place in the league when Botterill was fired. 4 years later, Kevyn Adams has the Sabres sitting…in 26th place.

What a plan.

It’s not whining - your standards are quite *literally* non existent. You can grant him the absurdly long list of caveats you went out of your way to laboriously detail and he STILL will have done an objectively terrible job.

We’ve done nothing. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, seer775 said:

So it's settled. Neither our GM nor our Owner want to build a successful hockey franchise. 

Leave it to the player to void their contract if they don't want to play. We literally handed Reinhart, Ullmark, and Eichel to winning teams for nothing in return. What sane person would do that?

I would not call this settled.  I am sure they do want to build a successful franchise, they must believe that winning is better than losing, the business itself would be easier to deal with.   Terry does not know how to , or where to go to find out.  Adams has a plan and after some steady improvement they are off the track this season and likely to miss their goal of playoffs.   There are signs (IMO) that Adams is limited by some of the past problems with this organization and signs that his slow and deliberate approach is further alienating the fan base.  

Eichel wanted out and his injury, and the treatment for it,  was a vehicle for that.  We acquired Tuch, Krebs, Östlund,  and another pick (can't recall who).  Tuch is a top 6 power forward that had more points than Eichel last year, this he is slow by injuries and the overall bad start of the team.  Krebs so far is a very young bottom 6 player, and shows a bit of upside.  Östlund is a top prospect, right now playing as the 1C for Sweden in the WJC.  Considering Eichel was injured and going for a surgery that was still fairly new I think Adams got about as much as he could, there was the injury risk that hurt the return.  

Reinhart was not going to re-sign so the trade was made.  We acquired a first round pick who turned about to be Jiri Kulich, now a top prospect in Rochester, on e of the top scorers in the AHL, and currently Captain of Czechia WJC Team.  In addition we received  Devon Levi, our top Goalie prospect.  Reinhart is fulfilling his promise in Florida, while Kulich and Levi show enough promise to make this trade one of the best in Sabres history.  

Ullmark was an UFA, free to go anywhere.  He wanted to move on from Buffalo.  Can't blame him.  

Players cannot void their contracts.  That has never happened to my knowledge.  If you are referring to Eichel, why would you want the distraction.  You would certainly lose favor with players around the league.  The divorce was better for both parties.  

I don't like everything Adams has done, and I think he has not done enough overall,  but you must acknowledge that he has the additional and painful job of repairing this clubs poor image around the league with players, coaches and FO people.   That unfortunate fact has been a hindrance to progress.   So far he has handled that part well.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thorny said:

The Sabres finished 25th place in the league when Botterill was fired. 4 years later, Kevyn Adams has the Sabres sitting…in 26th place.

What a plan.

It’s not whining - your standards are quite *literally* non existent. You can grant him the absurdly long list of caveats you went out of your way to laboriously detail and he STILL will have done an objectively terrible job.

We’ve done nothing. 

You know that’s not entirely fair when last year they were one point away from the playoffs. I’m not sure the consensus on the team was that we were going to take this large of a step backwards.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SDS said:

You know that’s not entirely fair when last year they were one point away from the playoffs. I’m not sure the consensus on the team was that we were going to take this large of a step backwards.

And yet, we DID take that step backwards. The consensus on whether it would happen or not is not relevant. Average out our point total from over the course of 4 seasons, then, if you prefer. 

Edited by Thorny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thorny said:

And yet, we DID take that step backwards. The consensus on whether it would happen or not is not relevant. Average out our point total from over the course of 4 seasons, then, if you prefer. 

The Sabres have played at a 75 point pace over Kevyn Adams 4 seasons as GM

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Then average out our point total from over the course of 4 seasons 

But that isn’t accurate; each year is a separate entity. You can’t merely average seasons together due to the massive differences in circumstances between each season as well as one being a shortened season against a makeshift division.

Adams had a train wreck 1st season while being copilot to Krueger’s wild ride

The 2nd season saw marginal improvements

The 3rd season was our most successful season since 2012 with us being in the race until game 78. 

Thus far Season 4 has been at minimum a moderate step back. 
 

If I knew for certain that Adams willingly ignored a potential 1G trade with a reasonable ask then I’d be far less lenient but I can’t know that because I don’t work in the front office. You can be hellbent on hating Adams for inaction all you want but you are doing so from a very limited scope of information. 
 

What would you say if the extreme case was true? No one is trading a 1G for anything remotely sane. And they haven’t since Ullmark’s departure. I have no idea how close to reality this could be but would your vitriol change? 
 

I hate losing, I want better results too. I just don’t have any motivation to get worked up over a lack of moves in a position that has few trades to begin with and a league that trades are rarely done outside of the Deadline or draft/FA time. I can’t bring myself to wholesale denounce Adams for something I do not know the full story. It may be a result based world but not knowing the causes can make any final determination difficult to make. For instance, I have no qualms with Adams turning down a hypothetical Saros for 4 1sts deal this past offseason since it would be borderline psychotic. Or a Cozens for Pesce type deal. Trade offers that are ridiculous that he declines aren’t automatically a blight on his record due to circumstances. If you need $1000 and someone offers you $1000 for your Porsche you wouldn’t take it because it’s insane.

Making trades for goalies is a borderline impossible job. If it were so simple then Toronto and Edmonton wouldn’t be in constant disarray over their goalies. There are “64” NHL goalies, less than 32 would be considered legitimate 1Gs. Boston has two and the Rangers/Isles have 1.5 1Gs. Trading for a goalie is very nearly the same as trading for a QB in the NFL. The best QBs don’t get traded, the mediocre ones occasionally do when their team drops off and decide to rebuild, the bad ones are a dime a dozen and are swapped at random as needed. Rarely, if ever, do you see a generally good goalie or QB traded and when it happens you see massive overpayment and 9/10th of the time huge regrets by the team receiving the major player. After all, there’s a reason a goalie is being dealt and rarely is it flattering to the goalie. 

Arguably the best goalie we could theoretically get our hands on is John Gibson from Anaheim who is covered in warts and scars. After all good goalies are on good teams and good teams don’t trade away good goalies barring cap issues as well as a cheaper and likely better option in the wings. Jacob Markstrom would be the only other goalie that would fit the criteria of a once well thought of goalie with ok stats usually being borderline expendable. Even then those teams know they have a rare commodity and thus ask for far more than the player is actually worth. Gibson for instance has been on trade rumors for 3 years and yet nothing has happened likely due to Anaheim asking for a King’s ransom for a guy who’s at best a Prince. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thorny said:

And yet, we DID take that step backwards. The consensus on whether it would happen or not is not relevant. Average out our point total from over the course of 4 seasons, then, if you prefer. 

Obviously I can’t make a strong case about results given where we are today, other than point out how much better last year was. It did happen. It was real. It did happen on his watch. Neither pointing out where we are today, nor averaging four seasons tell the complete story and you know that.

Regardless, the topic is about whether he is serious about winning. I know you have massive disagreements with him and I’m not arguing those points. But just because you or anyone else disagrees with his approach, doesn’t mean he isn’t serious. He could be wrong. He could be incompetent. But as I said before, and you disagreed with, disparaging his intentions is just cheap shot fan straw-man fodder. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Vomit 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SDS said:

Obviously I can’t make a strong case about results given where we are today, other than point out how much better last year was. It did happen. It was real. It did happen on his watch. Neither pointing out where we are today, nor averaging four seasons tell the complete story and you know that.

Regardless, the topic is about whether he is serious about winning. I know you have massive disagreements with him and I’m not arguing those points. But just because you or anyone else disagrees with his approach, doesn’t mean he isn’t serious. He could be wrong. He could be incompetent. But as I said before, and you disagreed with, disparaging his intentions is just cheap shot fan straw-man fodder. 

It’s not a cheap shot, it’s a nuance: he’s only interested in winning today in so far as it results from prioritizing winning later

Disastrous results need not follow only from a failure to want to win. They can and clearly due arise from that desire, as it relates to the now term, not being prioritized 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Thorny said:

poor Kevyn Adams

Poor Buffalo Sabres… Adams set us back a couple years, imo…

His rebuild strategy… his roster-building, his contracts, his decision-making… amounts to failure… See the BN today… Even Lysowski is beginning to see the truth…

Unclear the owner or Adams would agree, though… Pegula is enjoying his ride with the Bills… and Adams is wearing rose-colored glasses…

Given the current reality and regime, maybe we make the playoffs in the next couple years…

Unless big changes happen.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, seer775 said:

So it's settled. Neither our GM nor our Owner want to build a successful hockey franchise. 

Leave it to the player to void their contract if they don't want to play. We literally handed Reinhart, Ullmark, and Eichel to winning teams for nothing in return. What sane person would do that?

Really ??

Nonsense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, seer775 said:

So it's settled. Neither our GM nor our Owner want to build a successful hockey franchise. 

Leave it to the player to void their contract if they don't want to play. We literally handed Reinhart, Ullmark, and Eichel to winning teams for nothing in return. What sane person would do that?

I don't think people know what literally means. It's becoming the most overused word....and used incorrectly... My head is going to literally explode.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's trying to build a roster that wins and I like a lot of the talent in the pipeline and on the team but it comes down to poor coaching above all, imo. Secondly, poor player development (not just in play but in terms of individual development). They need to put a ton more resources into that. And that is on Pegula and Adams. That said, as I and others (and the video above) have noted (generating ill-tempered criticism) it's generally the same players he keeps drafting or accumulating. Arguably the most consistently physical player is also the most skilled - Dahlin. Cozens tries but the guy has to add strength and muscle weight (about 10 more lbs) as do most of the rest of the club. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

No, I don't think Adams or Granato is serious about winning. 

I think they both want to win. Problem is, Granato doesn't know how to get these guys to play the way they need to to win. I think Adams believes in his plan and it eventually will win, but when? It seems pretty clear he's all in on building the roster with homegrown talent. Problem is, that will likely take years and you have a fanbase that's staring down a 13th consecutive season without sniffing the playoffs and there is no patience for a further prolonged rebuild.

Personally, I think the current roster, with a few tweaks, absolutely can win. Unfortunately, right now, they're saddled with a coaching staff that has no idea how to get them to play with the effort and ability they flash occasionally. We see the same ***** issues almost every game and nobody is held accountable and few changes are made...the ones that are made amount to shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic. This team is going to pass 2 months without winning back-to-back games. The special teams are a sludge fart. They come out listless and uninspired almost every game. They make the same boneheaded mistakes pretty much every game. Almost the entire roster has regressed significantly from a strong finish last season. These are all coaching issues. But, it seems like Adams is "all in" on Granato and crew. I don't see them making a move any time soon. We'll hear the same platitudes after every loss. We'll hear them blame injuries. We'll hear them say they just need to get back to work. And they'll keep taking one step forward followed by 2 steps back.

What this organization lacks is a buffer between the owner and the operational side. They have nobody to hold anybody accountable. A serious hockey organization would see this season slipping away, judge it a failure and hold the GM's feet to the fire. A serious organization would move on from Granato and be looking for a coach that can get these guys to actually play hockey. This is not a serious hockey organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...