Gramps Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 They ditched Tyrod after leading them to the best record the team has had in 17 years. They ditched Tyrod after an abysmal loss to the the Jets and a slaughter @ home by the Saints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod played just fine against the Jets. True story. (I meant in the away game against the Jets.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gramps Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod played just fine against the Jets. True story. (I meant in the away game against the Jets.) That be true, but Dareus was gone and the defense left the building. TT sucked against the Saints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkard Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 So be it - do you think it's fair that they ditch Peterman after one half of play ? What would be rationale for playing TT if the defense continues to suck ? So they lose by less ? How about the fact that Taylor gives them the best chance to win? Peterman is in over his head. Taylor is no world beater but he's still the QB they've had since Flutie. They have almost no chance to win if Peterman starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gramps Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) How about the fact that Taylor gives them the best chance to win? Peterman is in over his head. Taylor is no world beater but he's still the QB they've had since Flutie. They have almost no chance to win if Peterman starts. Fact ... but does it matter if the D sucks ? They're not beating the Chiefs or the Pats. I'd go with the probability of 8-8 not making the playoffs and tank with Peterman. A few spots up in the '18 draft might make a difference in getting the right QB. Edited November 20, 2017 by gramps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 20, 2017 Report Share Posted November 20, 2017 They ditched Tyrod after leading them to the best record the team has had in 17 years. The +14 turnover ratio led them to the best record they've had since whenever. Tyrod helps keep turnovers down but the defense wasn't going to keep creating them at 4+ per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 The +14 turnover ratio led them to the best record they've had since whenever. Tyrod helps keep turnovers down but the defense wasn't going to keep creating them at 4+ per game. Oh, of course. But the guy who throws 5 picks in 20 minutes doesn't help at all. Like, not even a little bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Oh, of course. But the guy who throws 5 picks in 20 minutes doesn't help at all. Like, not even a little bit. We can agree on that. He looked so... Under qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 We can agree on that. He looked so... Under qualified. Like sh!t is the term I used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Oh, of course. But the guy who throws 5 picks in 20 minutes doesn't help at all. Like, not even a little bit. Peterman is only the second QB since the 1930s to throw 5 picks on fewer than 15 attempts. Archie Manning did it in 1973, in a 62-7 loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted November 21, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Peterman is only the second QB since the 1930s to throw 5 picks on fewer than 15 attempts. Archie Manning did it in 1973, in a 62-7 loss. So we have to wait until Peterman has a kid and then draft that guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 So we have to wait until Peterman has a kid and then draft that guy No, the first one sucks. It's the second one that you tank for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkard Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) No, the first one sucks. It's the second one that you tank for. Yeah but you know the second one is going to be an entitled brat and demand to choose the team he wants to play for. It definitely won't be us, but could you really blame him? Edited November 21, 2017 by Drunkard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Yeah but you know the second one is going to be an entitled brat and demand to choose the team he wants to play for. It definitely won't be us, but could you really blame him? Um, you're thinking of the third one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Um, you're thinking of the third one. Correct. The second one will go back to school for his senior year if we are in position to draft him after his junior year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 McDermott is almost making Rex look competent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkard Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Um, you're thinking of the third one. So there was another Manning kid before Peyton? Never knew that. McDermott is almost making Rex look competent Never thought I'd miss that oaf. Even he wouldn't put Peterman back in there after what happened last game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Cooper manning. We were very high on the process and etc... Now we are not. We suck a lot, you don't go from 5-2 to this mess of allowing 50 pets a game without sucking... But what it ultimately shows is that our guys can play, but our coaches cannot adjust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Cooper manning. We were very high on the process and etc... Now we are not. We suck a lot, you don't go from 5-2 to this mess of allowing 50 pets a game without sucking... But what it ultimately shows is that our guys can play, but our coaches cannot adjust. Orrrrr the Bills were creating turnovers at an unprecedented level which given their level of talent was going to reverse itself. This team was never good. Their bereft of talent. They unloaded 5 of their best players before or during the season. The only issue with this team was that they actually found a way to win a few games to start the season they had no business winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Orrrrr the Bills were creating turnovers at an unprecedented level which given their level of talent was going to reverse itself. This team was never good. Their bereft of talent. They unloaded 5 of their best players before or during the season. The only issue with this team was that they actually found a way to win a few games to start the season they had no business winning. I think that many of the faithful had convinced themselves that was sustainable. It was not. And it almost never is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Tyrod played just fine against the Jets. True story. (I meant in the away game against the Jets.) I beg to differ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 I think that many of the faithful had convinced themselves that was sustainable. It was not. And it almost never is. Uh huh. Just look at earlier in this thread, people talking about how the randomness of turnovers is overstated, and the type we were generating were coached and repeatable. Blah blah blah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 Uh huh. Just look at earlier in this thread, people talking about how the randomness of turnovers is overstated, and the type we were generating were coached and repeatable. Blah blah blah. I still believe that, if we had kept Dareus. It all starts with the line. Now that they have to play the run a lot more, they aren't able to swarm to the ball like they had when he was here. Stupid move. If only he didn't like the Devil's weed so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 I still believe that, if we had kept Dareus. It all starts with the line. Now that they have to play the run a lot more, they aren't able to swarm to the ball like they had when he was here. Stupid move. If only he didn't like the Devil's weed so much. He was playing a third of the snaps. The turnovers didn't dry up because we traded a rotational player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted November 21, 2017 Report Share Posted November 21, 2017 He was playing a third of the snaps. The turnovers didn't dry up because we traded a rotational player. Sure. So one third of the plays are just not important? That doesn't sound like something a numbers guy would say. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts