tom webster Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 First, maybe I will ask that this thread be merged with my annual off season contest but that's a subject for another day. As for my line up projections; Kane - McEichel - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Ennis Foligno - Girgensons - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hjalmarsson - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Georges - Pysyk Weber Jones Enroth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 First, maybe I will ask that this thread be merged with my annual off season contest but that's a subject for another day. As for my line up projections; Kane - McEichel - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Ennis Foligno - Girgensons - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hjalmarsson - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Georges - Pysyk Weber Jones Enroth Wherefore art thou, Grigs? I guess it's a good thing to have more forwards than you have places for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny DangerFace Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 kane - mceichel - ennis moulson - reinhart - girgensons foligno - grigs - gionta deslauriers - larsson - schaller (no clue on d pairings) zadorov - bogo mccabe - risto weber - pysyk neuvirth Talbot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom webster Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Wherefore art thou, Grigs? I guess it's a good thing to have more forwards than you have places for. I expect him to be dealt in off season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samson's Flow Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 First, maybe I will ask that this thread be merged with my annual off season contest but that's a subject for another day. As for my line up projections; Kane - McEichel - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Ennis Foligno - Girgensons - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hjalmarsson - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Georges - Pysyk Weber Jones Enroth yes please. Sharp is exactly the kind of RW that we need. Those lines make sense to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Hjalmarsson would be a nice fit if he is a victim of the Hawks cap woes. I have a sneaking suspicion though they may be putting Seabrook on the market - older, higher cap hit, more likely to get a good return. The Hawks have done a real good job protecting their core in the past though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader1969 Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Whats the predicted roster when Buffalo finishes 29th and Toronto wins the lottery? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 (edited) Whats the predicted roster when Buffalo finishes 29th and Toronto wins the lottery? You shut your ###### mouth. Edit: this is a fun one. One syllable, guess the word. Edited March 4, 2015 by kvetch monstrovich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 (edited) Whats the predicted roster when Buffalo finishes 29th and Toronto wins the lottery? Kane - Ennis - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Girgensons Foligno - Grigorenko - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hanifin - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Gorges - Pysyk Weber Jones Niemi Edited March 4, 2015 by Ligerovich 4GM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Hjalmarsson would be a nice fit if he is a victim of the Hawks cap woes. I have a sneaking suspicion though they may be putting Seabrook on the market - older, higher cap hit, more likely to get a good return. The Hawks have done a real good job protecting their core in the past though. Picking up Hjalmarsson would be awesome (obviously Seabrook too but I think they keep him if that's the choice). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 You shut your ###### mouth. Edit: this is a fun one. One syllable, guess the word. W-hore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 W-hore? Yep. I always think ##### looks like the F word in every single situation. Also, I said the Clash sucks. Has this bear any claws? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude_Verret Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 I think I found the analogy that describes my disinterest in the team this season, which is strange considering I am a die-hard fan. Years ago, when the NFL had a strike, they replaced the players with scabs. Sure, it was still the Buffalo Bills, but the games were meaningless and the players were not people who you would associate or get behind. D'Amigo = Brian McClure Varone = Todd Schlopy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 (edited) Yep. I always think ##### looks like the F word in every single situation. Also, I said the Clash sucks. Has this bear any claws? Bear was learning physics :death: I went through that thread and was hoping NS would make an appearance into our showdown but no luck. I guess to get the wild NS you must make the appropriate call. FUCALE!!-FUCALE-Fucale-Fucale-Fucale FUCALE!!-FUCALE-Fucale-Fucale-Fucale Edited March 4, 2015 by WildComrade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Also, I said the Clash sucks. Has this bear any claws? Them's fightin' words, Mr. gimmick-hungry yob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sicknfla Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Kane - Ennis - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Girgensons Foligno - Grigorenko - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hanifin - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Gorges - Pysyk Weber Jones Niemi Realistic lineup. Your 3rd and 4th lines would not score a combined 40- 50 goals. Reinhart is still a big question mark to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Realistic lineup. Your 3rd and 4th lines would not score a combined 40- 50 goals. Reinhart is still a big question mark to me. True and the wild card out there are these AHLers currently up with the team. Does any of them have a breakout during the final 18 games and make the team next year. Larsson is the obvious choice, but I wonder if someone like Dalpe or even Varone who is getting a good look, opens eyes and really shines??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Realistic lineup. Your 3rd and 4th lines would not score a combined 40- 50 goals. Reinhart is still a big question mark to me. I agree that the 3rd and 4th line won't score 50 goals combined but the current team is only on pace for something like 140goals total as a team. I have very little questions about Sam Reinhart left, he has basically done everything I needed him to do this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabresFanInRochester Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Kane - Ennis - Sharp Moulson - Reinhart - Girgensons Foligno - Grigorenko - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Mitchell McCormick Hanifin - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Gorges - Pysyk Weber Jones Niemi :wallbash: No, no, no! As Rick Jeanneret once said about this team, "Now do you believe?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 :wallbash: No, no, no! As Rick Jeanneret once said about this team, "Now do you believe?" First you need to calm down. Then you need to scroll up and pay attention to what I was actually responding to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Realistic lineup. Your 3rd and 4th lines would not score a combined 40- 50 goals. How many do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKnowPhysics Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 First you need to calm down. Then you need to scroll up and pay attention to what I was actually responding to. Heh. Beatings will continue until morale improves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Bear was learning physics :death: I went through that thread and was hoping NS would make an appearance into our showdown but no luck. I guess to get the wild NS you must make the appropriate call. FUCALE!!-FUCALE-Fucale-Fucale-Fucale FUCALE!!-FUCALE-Fucale-Fucale-Fucale Hahaha getting others to fight your battles for ya. Them's fightin' words, Mr. gimmick-hungry yob. You and 11 both threatened so I'll come clean. I do like the Clash. I was just tryna poke the beah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sicknfla Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) How many do?I was being generous with 40-50. That current group doesn't have 20 so far this year. So if the top 2 lines produce 120 which is being VERY generous based on what I am looking at that means that Ligers lineup is good for 140-170 goals next year. That would have us pretty much where we are right now - last place or close to it. This is also why I think we do not pick Hannifan. With what we already have on D, and our lack of organizational scoring threats, he has to flip that pick if we have it. He has no choice. Murray's job is going to get real interesting if we don't bring this McEichel gig to fruition. Edited March 5, 2015 by sicknfla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 (edited) I was being generous with 40-50. That current group doesn't have 20 so far this year. So if the top 2 lines produce 120 which is being VERY generous based on what I am looking at that means that Ligers lineup is good for 140-170 goals next year. That would have us pretty much where we are right now - last place or close to it. I would tend to believe we would be in the 170 range next year if all goes well (meaning McEichel). As for my lineup just keep in mind I was asked what I thought it could be if we drafted #3. I personally believe we will see this lineup: Kane - McEichel - Ennis Moulson - Reinhart - Girgensons Foligno - Grigorenko - Gionta Deslauriers - Larsson - Stempniak McCormick/Kaleta Gorges - Bogosian Zadorov - Risto Boychuk - Pysyk Weber/Stachan Niemi Jones I would say the top 2 lines should get about 130 goals with the bottom 2 lines chipping in another 40. Edited March 5, 2015 by Ligerovich 4GM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.