thewookie1 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago They have been trying to sell the team for awhile now; owning 2 teams in the same league is a tad odd to say the least. 2 Quote
tom webster Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago I’m not surprised by decision but giving a one week notice seems like a bit of a pressure move. Quote
Eleven Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago I'm sitting with Josh Byrne's sister-in-law right now. She's a little concerned about what this means for Josh's brother Taylor. Quote
Porous Five Hole Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/lacrosse/2025/06/23/rochester-knighthawks-looking-for-new-owners-after-pegula-divest/84319445007/ More info here, but soft paywall. This coincides with the Pegula’s giving up control of the arena, so it makes sense for them. I can confirm the Pegula’s made their intentions known with the NLL a long time before today. “I can confirm there are local entities that have interest in keeping the team in Rochester,” Guelli said. “That’s the goal…The league is basically taking over those conversations, with the goal of getting someone in place before next season starts. They’re pretty bullish that they can get somebody in here and take over.” Personally, I think this franchise is cooked, unfortunately. They may play in ROC for one more year, but the love for this team left when the Hawks relocated the first time. It was never the same after that. Quote
Taro T Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, Brawndo said: Interesting. TIL. Honestly thought the Pegulas had sold that team about 1-1/2 years ago. Didn't realize they still owned and ran them. Guess they just put them up for sale 1-1/2 years ago. Oops. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Taro T said: Interesting. TIL. Honestly thought the Pegulas had sold that team about 1-1/2 years ago. Didn't realize they still owned and ran them. Guess they just put them up for sale 1-1/2 years ago. Oops. I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. 1 Quote
pastajoe Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 24 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. The attendance of their biggest attraction, the Amerks, averages around 6,000. So there is no justification for that large of a venue. Quote
Timonthy 76 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said: I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. NLL is a money loser, look for the owner of the Rock to sell in the next 4 months, he’s had enough of losing money. With Toronto, Philadelphia and others I can see NLL folding in 5 years Quote
Taro T Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 58 minutes ago, pastajoe said: The attendance of their biggest attraction, the Amerks, averages around 6,000. So there is no justification for that large of a venue. Thanks, Jabba. Thank you for bringing in the Swamp Cats as the parent to the Amerks when they were what the Sabres are now. Thank you for killing a very vibrant hockey market. Too bad for you, you only essentially killed pro hockey in the area. Youth hockey is thriving and one of the local rinks is even adding a new sheet this summer. Go fork yourself, Donner the Hutt. Quote
Doohickie Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said: I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. So much demand that when the Fort Worth NLL club stopped operations last year, no other city was interested in buying a team that was established and had made playoffs the last two seasons. They just folded. The Bandits are a unicorn that they have a good team in a big league city arena and little to no competition for fans during their season (since the Sabres suck hard ballz). Rochester is a more typical city for the league and if they can't support an NLL club, why would another city want to jump on that? Edited 2 hours ago by Doohickie Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Doohickie said: So much demand that when the Fort Worth NLL club stopped operations last year, no other city was interested in buying a team that was established and had made playoffs the last two seasons. They just folded. I'm surprised. The Las Vegas team had an expansion fee of $10 million. Quote
Doohickie Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Just now, PromoTheRobot said: I'm surprised. The Las Vegas team had an expansion fee of $10 million. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Quote
shrader Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Taro T said: Thanks, Jabba. Thank you for bringing in the Swamp Cats as the parent to the Amerks when they were what the Sabres are now. Thank you for killing a very vibrant hockey market. Too bad for you, you only essentially killed pro hockey in the area. Youth hockey is thriving and one of the local rinks is even adding a new sheet this summer. Go fork yourself, Donner the Hutt. I miss those days. I know that sounds crazy, but your posts were fun and the Sabres have imploded right after he finally left. 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted 25 minutes ago Report Posted 25 minutes ago PSE was dissolved several years ago. Who’s the “we” in Pete’s statement? Weird. Quote
Big Guava Posted 7 minutes ago Report Posted 7 minutes ago 8 hours ago, Eleven said: I'm sitting with Josh Byrne's sister-in-law right now. She's a little concerned about what this means for Josh's brother Taylor. Is she hot? Quote
Eleven Posted just now Report Posted just now 5 minutes ago, Big Guava said: Is she hot? Wow, those eighteen months or so that I missed really brought in some quality posters. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.