JohnC Posted yesterday at 05:31 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:31 PM 2 minutes ago, dudacek said: The bold is your opinion. My opinion is Terry is bringing back Kevyn because he’s been in lockstep with every move. Firing him would be an acknowledgement that Terry himself was wrong and he’s not ready to admit that. When’s the last time you’ve witnessed an incompetent person acknowledging his/ her own incompetence? Usually, the accusing finger is pointing outwards and not inwards. Quote
Weave Posted yesterday at 05:31 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:31 PM 6 minutes ago, dudacek said: The bold is your opinion. My opinion is Terry is bringing back Kevyn because he’s been in lockstep with every move. Firing him would be an acknowledgement that Terry himself was wrong and he’s not ready to admit that. I would not be surprised to here that KA is the first GM Terry hired that didn’t object to “Terry’s way”. Quote
darksabre Posted yesterday at 06:25 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:25 PM 53 minutes ago, dudacek said: The bold is your opinion. My opinion is Terry is bringing back Kevyn because he’s been in lockstep with every move. Firing him would be an acknowledgement that Terry himself was wrong and he’s not ready to admit that. It's a matter of trust. Terry took a lot of advice from a lot of people after he bought the club, and I suspect he feels betrayed. These outsiders led him astray. Snakes in the grass. Deceivers. Kevyn has been with him a long time, and seems to be the only person he thinks isn't playing games with him. He's never going to fire the guy, not in any way that fans want. They may "reorganize the front office", but it'll always be in a way that Kevyn is able to save face. As long as Terry owns this team, KA is going to be around. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted yesterday at 06:29 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:29 PM 2 minutes ago, darksabre said: It's a matter of trust. Terry took a lot of advice from a lot of people after he bought the club, and I suspect he feels betrayed. These outsiders led him astray. Snakes in the grass. Deceivers. Kevyn has been with him a long time, and seems to be the only person he thinks isn't playing games with him. He's never going to fire the guy, not in any way that fans want. They may "reorganize the front office", but it'll always be in a way that Kevyn is able to save face. As long as Terry owns this team, KA is going to be around. 100%. But Adams doesn't HAVE to ALWAYS be associated with running the team. He could (dear Lord, PLEASE let this happen) get moved to a position running some other piece of Pegula's empire. Kevyn gets a promotion and we get a reprieve. (At least until we find it is was so that Jerry Forton gets to take over. 😢 ) 2 Quote
darksabre Posted yesterday at 06:33 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:33 PM 3 minutes ago, Taro T said: 100%. But Adams doesn't HAVE to ALWAYS be associated with running the team. He could (dear Lord, PLEASE let this happen) get moved to a position running some other piece of Pegula's empire. Kevyn gets a promotion and we get a reprieve. (At least until we find it is was so that Jerry Forton gets to take over. 😢 ) [one finger on the monkey's paw curls] 2 Quote
mjd1001 Posted yesterday at 07:23 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:23 PM So, I haven't looked into the numbers that much, and maybe someone brought this up...but the Rangers were supposedly interested in Peterka, right? Is trading Kreider the start of moves to fee up money to put a decent sized/bigger offer sheet for Peterka? Quote
thewookie1 Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 4 minutes ago, mjd1001 said: So, I haven't looked into the numbers that much, and maybe someone brought this up...but the Rangers were supposedly interested in Peterka, right? Is trading Kreider the start of moves to fee up money to put a decent sized/bigger offer sheet for Peterka? They'd have to pay him quite over the top Quote
dudacek Posted 23 hours ago Author Report Posted 23 hours ago 26 minutes ago, mjd1001 said: So, I haven't looked into the numbers that much, and maybe someone brought this up...but the Rangers were supposedly interested in Peterka, right? Is trading Kreider the start of moves to fee up money to put a decent sized/bigger offer sheet for Peterka? Unlikely. It basically gives them space to sign their two big RFAs Cuylle and Miller. Besides, the don't have their 2nd rounder next year, which they would need for a sheet between $7-11M AAV 1 Quote
ponokasabre Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago Interesting! Id be interested in moving him if we got Adam Klapka and Kevin Bahl back in the trade Bahl is 24 6'6 230lbs right shot defensman who is an RFA, perfect partner for Owen Power, he was the main piece in the Jacob Markstrom deal from New Jersey so Lindy would know him Klapka is 24 6'8 235 lbs 4th line forward that hits everything that moves, he was one of Calgary's best players down the stretch, they just resigned him at 2 years 1.25 per year This is the kind of deal I would take for Peterka, it sends him out west and it solves so many holes for us. This deal would also bring back minimal cap so we could then go free agent hunting if we wanted to to get a vet to take Peterkas spot. The Byram deal would also open up cap that could be used elsewhere to add vets and salary to really help this team improve! 1 2 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Ever since the Eichel stuff, I've found the Rangers to be annoying. I also think Drury is a gm you can outmatch. 1 Quote
ponokasabre Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: Ever since the Eichel stuff, I've found the Rangers to be annoying. I also think Drury is a gm you can outmatch. Ya if they want Peterka they can have him for Cuylle and Schnieder, id even add to that if they wanted 2 Quote
Brawndo Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 10 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Ever since the Eichel stuff, I've found the Rangers to be annoying. I also think Drury is a gm you can outmatch. They will never reach Adams level of incompetence, but Drury and Verbeek are not good GMs Quote
thewookie1 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Brawndo said: If they honestly OS the 4 1sts level I’d let him go and be happy for Peterka. He’s a great player but he’s certainly nowhere near 11.7mil per. i also believe 8x9mil would put him at that level too. I’d be saddened but accept 4 1sts because 8x9mil isn’t exactly a number we can afford next season. Did they change the whole 5 year thing? Where 6/7 year deals would have their total divided by 5 for compensation levels. Edited 20 hours ago by thewookie1 Quote
Porous Five Hole Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 6 hours ago, darksabre said: I think the Sabres consistently have too many players that don't have an extra gear. We see flashes of it from time to time, but mostly they're just overloaded with okay players who thrive when surrounded by players who do have that extra gear. You were suggesting to trade Tage and called him garbage. Apologies if you were being funny or sarcastic, but Tage is the first guy to have two 40+ goal seasons for this franchise in almost 20 years. Tage was also third in the league in goal scoring. To me, that’s the extra gear and you wanted it traded. So you’re suggesting to trade a bunch of “non extra gear” guys for the “extra gear” guys? Seems likely. Quote
thewookie1 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Apparently the Rangers want to OS Peterka but they don’t have anywhere near a decent contract they can offer. 5x7mil is like their max until reaching about 7x9mil. 7x9mil would mean the 12th pick goes to Pittsburgh and then 26, 27, 28, 29 1sts would be our compensation. At 5x7mil we can easily match and skip to the bank. Quote
Flashsabre Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 3 hours ago, ponokasabre said: Interesting! Id be interested in moving him if we got Adam Klapka and Kevin Bahl back in the trade Bahl is 24 6'6 230lbs right shot defensman who is an RFA, perfect partner for Owen Power, he was the main piece in the Jacob Markstrom deal from New Jersey so Lindy would know him Klapka is 24 6'8 235 lbs 4th line forward that hits everything that moves, he was one of Calgary's best players down the stretch, they just resigned him at 2 years 1.25 per year This is the kind of deal I would take for Peterka, it sends him out west and it solves so many holes for us. This deal would also bring back minimal cap so we could then go free agent hunting if we wanted to to get a vet to take Peterkas spot. The Byram deal would also open up cap that could be used elsewhere to add vets and salary to really help this team improve! Kevin Bahl is a LHD 2 Quote
JohnC Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Brawndo said: They will never reach Adams level of incompetence, but Drury and Verbeek are not good GMs Are you suggesting that KA is a standard setter that will be difficult to match? Edited 19 hours ago by JohnC Quote
Mr. Allen Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, ponokasabre said: Ya if they want Peterka they can have him for Cuylle and Schnieder, id even add to that if they wanted You’re probably awesome as a person, but your trade offers are terrible. lol. The Bahl Klapka one is worse though. lol Quote
Mr. Allen Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago Actually, your offers are probably more realistic with Adams at the helm, but we like to dream here in Sabre space. Ha Quote
Palm Trees And Taxes Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago If JJ Peterka signs an offer sheet with NY, the AAV would make the compensation be a 1st, 2nd and a 3rd. IF the Sabres were able to land another top forward like a Jason Robertson, or even a Jordan Kyrou (who is rumored to be available), I would gladly let JJ walk for that compensation. Quote
Mr Peabody Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mr. Allen said: You’re probably awesome as a person, but your trade offers are terrible. lol. The Bahl Klapka one is worse though. lol I think the Rangers would turn down the JJ trade Pono proposed. Quote
Night Train Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago On 6/11/2025 at 8:52 AM, darksabre said: Package him up with Thompson and see what we get. empty seats comes to mind.. 1 2 Quote
darksabre Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 16 hours ago, Porous Five Hole said: You were suggesting to trade Tage and called him garbage. Apologies if you were being funny or sarcastic, but Tage is the first guy to have two 40+ goal seasons for this franchise in almost 20 years. Tage was also third in the league in goal scoring. To me, that’s the extra gear and you wanted it traded. So you’re suggesting to trade a bunch of “non extra gear” guys for the “extra gear” guys? Seems likely. I'm not interested in stats as justification for chaining ourselves to players who don't get it done when it counts. We've been playing that game for like 20 years on this site. How many massive losing streaks have Tage Thompson's Sabres experienced? What's Tage bringing to this team when he's getting shoved off the puck in the corners despite being 6 foot 6? Guess the Sabres shouldn't have traded Pierre Turgeon either. 3 hours ago, Night Train said: empty seats comes to mind.. Anyone still showing up is a fool anyway. Quote
inkman Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 19 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Ever since the Eichel stuff, I've found the Rangers to be annoying. I also think Drury is a gm you can outmatch. You mean how Rangers fans wouldn’t give up Kakko or Laff for Eichel. Yeah I’m done with that too. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.