dudacek Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM Here is the UFA market. Not sure there are answers there. Quote
The Jokeman Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM Report Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM 55 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: We all agree they need an experienced #1 NHL goalie right? That you can't run upl/ Levi and expect any hope of playoffs? Yes, keep Levi in Rochester unless injury. Quote
LGR4GM Posted Sunday at 03:55 PM Report Posted Sunday at 03:55 PM (edited) 15 minutes ago, dudacek said: Here is the UFA market. Not sure there are answers there. Jake Allen maybe? Actually Anton Forsberg is an option, Our new Sr advisor knows him Edited Sunday at 03:59 PM by LGR4GM Quote
The Jokeman Posted Sunday at 04:28 PM Report Posted Sunday at 04:28 PM 29 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Jake Allen maybe? Actually Anton Forsberg is an option, Our new Sr advisor knows him I brought up Vladar earlier as his GAA and save percentage numbers been solid minus 2023-2024. To me he's as good as can find as a 1B you can find. I keep UPL to pair with him and eventually Levi. Quote
Flashsabre Posted Sunday at 05:00 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:00 PM 29 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: I brought up Vladar earlier as his GAA and save percentage numbers been solid minus 2023-2024. To me he's as good as can find as a 1B you can find. I keep UPL to pair with him and eventually Levi. This is where Jarmo would come in. Adams is so obsessed with Levi being the answer that he can’t see any other option. Hopefully Jarmo can shake it up a bit in that front office. Ive always liked Vladar but he’s never taken that step I thought he would. 1 Quote
Broken Ankles Posted Sunday at 05:04 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:04 PM 59 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Jake Allen maybe? Actually Anton Forsberg is an option, Our new Sr advisor knows him Forsberg, with a high bid on AAV (cause taxes and tree types) but low term. Give him a legit chance to capture a 1a role and spin it into a long term deal in summer of 2026/27. Don’t use trade capital on a Demko or others this year. Use Bo + prospects + Draft picks to solidify two RD/stay at home types. Then see results of a 1a/1b tandem can do. We need at least one season with a respectable top 4 group. Question is how much does the offer have to be over others to convince a UFA to sign with Buffalo? If he was $2.75M in OTT would $4M do it? Quote
LGR4GM Posted Sunday at 05:46 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:46 PM 41 minutes ago, Broken Ankles said: Forsberg, with a high bid on AAV (cause taxes and tree types) but low term. Give him a legit chance to capture a 1a role and spin it into a long term deal in summer of 2026/27. Don’t use trade capital on a Demko or others this year. Use Bo + prospects + Draft picks to solidify two RD/stay at home types. Then see results of a 1a/1b tandem can do. We need at least one season with a respectable top 4 group. Question is how much does the offer have to be over others to convince a UFA to sign with Buffalo? If he was $2.75M in OTT would $4M do it? We don't need 2 rhd stay at homes, we need one for Power. Dahlin needs a lhd stay at home type. Quote
Broken Ankles Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:55 PM 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: We don't need 2 rhd stay at homes, we need one for Power. Dahlin needs a lhd stay at home type. Just because he can play on his off-hand, doesn’t mean he should. Dahlin provides flexibility that other defenders do not but for planning, it needs to be RD. In addition, others on the farm (little Nikita and RJ) are LD and will soon need a vet RD to support. Let’s cross that bridge now in stead of waiting like they did with Owen. Quote
Thorny Posted Sunday at 07:26 PM Report Posted Sunday at 07:26 PM 4 hours ago, LGR4GM said: We all agree they need an experienced #1 NHL goalie right? That you can't run upl/ Levi and expect any hope of playoffs? I honestly don’t even think about goalie upgrades. We are going on 6 years now it’s just not an area Adams addresses. I guess with Jarmo in the fold I should at least start considering the possibility If we see a substantial move, it’s likely due to his influence Quote
Palm Trees And Taxes Posted Sunday at 09:04 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:04 PM On 5/29/2025 at 12:23 PM, Mr. Allen said: Trade for Demko a possibility? I like this idea. I am absolutely not married to the idea of Levi becoming a franchise goalie. Demko has a lot of skill and IF he can stay healthy, can be a steal for Buffalo. And he is only signed for 1 more year 1 Quote
French Collection Posted Sunday at 10:29 PM Report Posted Sunday at 10:29 PM 24 minutes ago, Palm Trees And Taxes said: I like this idea. I am absolutely not married to the idea of Levi becoming a franchise goalie. Demko has a lot of skill and IF he can stay healthy, can be a steal for Buffalo. And he is only signed for 1 more year Sometimes you have to gamble a bit and you’re buying low. Capitals got lucky with that position last year. 4 hours ago, Flashsabre said: This is where Jarmo would come in. Adams is so obsessed with Levi being the answer that he can’t see any other option. Hopefully Jarmo can shake it up a bit in that front office. Ive always liked Vladar but he’s never taken that step I thought he would. Jarmo, being a Finn, could also tell UPL to shape up or he will be shipped out in his native tongue. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Monday at 06:35 AM Report Posted Monday at 06:35 AM Demko might be very available given how good Silovs has been in the Abbotsford Canucks playoff run. He's no longer waiver exempt and so Canucks might decide to move Demko and keep him. Quote
thewookie1 Posted Monday at 06:46 AM Report Posted Monday at 06:46 AM 11 hours ago, Broken Ankles said: Just because he can play on his off-hand, doesn’t mean he should. Dahlin provides flexibility that other defenders do not but for planning, it needs to be RD. In addition, others on the farm (little Nikita and RJ) are LD and will soon need a vet RD to support. Let’s cross that bridge now in stead of waiting like they did with Owen. Dahlin actually looks better on his off-side 9 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Demko might be very available given how good Silovs has been in the Abbotsford Canucks playoff run. He's no longer waiver exempt and so Canucks might decide to move Demko and keep him. It would take some cap finagling but I'd be happy to give him a shot. Let him and UPL compete Quote
LGR4GM Posted Monday at 10:29 AM Report Posted Monday at 10:29 AM 15 hours ago, Broken Ankles said: Just because he can play on his off-hand, doesn’t mean he should. Dahlin provides flexibility that other defenders do not but for planning, it needs to be RD. In addition, others on the farm (little Nikita and RJ) are LD and will soon need a vet RD to support. Let’s cross that bridge now in stead of waiting like they did with Owen. Dahlin prefers his off side. Nikita Novikov actually has more pro experience than Owen Power. Finding a veteran 3rd line rhd isn't a big concern impo but maybe Fabbro or Perbix can be slotted there. Quote
Drag0nDan Posted Monday at 02:07 PM Report Posted Monday at 02:07 PM (edited) 7 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Demko might be very available given how good Silovs has been in the Abbotsford Canucks playoff run. He's no longer waiver exempt and so Canucks might decide to move Demko and keep him. They already extended Lankinen, so I assume theyre moving demko either this offseason or at the deadline. Me personally? Step 1 is getting rid of UPL somehow. Edited Monday at 02:08 PM by Drag0nDan Quote
LGR4GM Posted Monday at 03:26 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:26 PM Adams will run back UPL and Levi because he doesn't have his own ideas. Quote
Flashsabre Posted Monday at 03:28 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:28 PM 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: Adams will run back UPL and Levi because he doesn't have his own ideas. Hopefully Jarmo’s ideas are better😃 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Monday at 07:22 PM Report Posted Monday at 07:22 PM 12 hours ago, thewookie1 said: Dahlin actually looks better on his off-side It would take some cap finagling but I'd be happy to give him a shot. Let him and UPL compete Cap finagling isn't the problem some people keep thinking it is. You can move bodies out if you are a creative GM. It's done constantly around the league. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Monday at 07:26 PM Report Posted Monday at 07:26 PM 5 hours ago, Drag0nDan said: They already extended Lankinen, so I assume theyre moving demko either this offseason or at the deadline. Me personally? Step 1 is getting rid of UPL somehow. I don't see the urgency in getting rid of UPL. If we got Demko he starts, Levi can battle UPL for the back up job and if he earns it definitively then you can look at it but otherwise you start Levi in Rochester and let it play out the way these things play out on other teams. Rookies EARNING jobs, not being given them. Quote
The Jokeman Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 18 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: I don't see the urgency in getting rid of UPL. If we got Demko he starts, Levi can battle UPL for the back up job and if he earns it definitively then you can look at it but otherwise you start Levi in Rochester and let it play out the way these things play out on other teams. Rookies EARNING jobs, not being given them. The only way I move UPL is if we acquire a legitimate #1 G, I know some have suggested Oettinger which is nice except he under contract til 2033. That's a super commitment and I am not comfortable with it as this team, I don't know if system/players or combo of both but worry he won't live up to that contract here. Quote
Drag0nDan Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 20 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: I don't see the urgency in getting rid of UPL. If we got Demko he starts, Levi can battle UPL for the back up job and if he earns it definitively then you can look at it but otherwise you start Levi in Rochester and let it play out the way these things play out on other teams. Rookies EARNING jobs, not being given them. My issue with UPL is he is not very good, especially when considering what he's being paid now. If he is starting 30ish games, i expect to lose more than i win with him in net, and i don't see a ceiling of anything notable. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 7 hours ago, The Jokeman said: The only way I move UPL is if we acquire a legitimate #1 G, I know some have suggested Oettinger which is nice except he under contract til 2033. That's a super commitment and I am not comfortable with it as this team, I don't know if system/players or combo of both but worry he won't live up to that contract here. I'm making that deal . imo you want to build a winning team you start with 3 pillars. A franchise goalie, a franchise D man and a top scoring forward. We have the D man 100% in Dahlin, Thompson isn't the best in the league but he can be viewed as a top level scoring forward, and the missing pillar is a star goalie. Oettinger can be that. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 5 hours ago, Drag0nDan said: My issue with UPL is he is not very good, especially when considering what he's being paid now. If he is starting 30ish games, i expect to lose more than i win with him in net, and i don't see a ceiling of anything notable. Consistent no, but as a back up I think adequate. overpaid in that role but so be it until Levi can take it from him. Depth is important too if we want to be serious about winning Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.