DarthEbriate Posted Thursday at 06:03 PM Report Posted Thursday at 06:03 PM 6 minutes ago, dudacek said: Here's something I suspect the Sabres are very much aware of even if Sabrespace is not: Owen Power is the only LHD the Sabres have picked in the first 3 rounds of the past 5 drafts. Centre: Kulich, Östlund, Savoie, Wahlberg, Helenius RSW: Quinn, Sardarian, Rosen, Zeimer LSW: Peterka, Bloom, Kisakov, Poltapov, Neuchev, Benson LSD: Power RSD: McCarthy, Strbak, Kleber Goalie: Leinonen That glut you see on the NHL roster? Bryson is a spare part, Dahlin is comfortable on the right, Byram is getting traded and Samuelsson may follow him out the door. If I had to predict their pick, it would be Smith: a big, mobile 2-way D who plays with the edge Lindy says is missing, and is headed to Terry's alma mater. Aitcheson is also in the mix. Good call. 5 drafts? Sheesh, Ryan Johnson is old. Too old to begin the training. For everyone else keeping score on LSD: Osburn 4th, Geary 6th, Keohane 6th, Panocha 7th, Novikov 6th 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted Thursday at 06:09 PM Author Report Posted Thursday at 06:09 PM Osburn is underrated. As long as Buffalo keeps their 2nd and 3rd, they'll have a bunch of lhd options. Quote
dudacek Posted Thursday at 06:28 PM Report Posted Thursday at 06:28 PM 10 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Osburn is underrated. As long as Buffalo keeps their 2nd and 3rd, they'll have a bunch of lhd options. I think @DarthEbriate is correct to add Johnson and Novikkv to the mix and agree with you on Osburn. The TLDR version is the Sabres are well-balanced in all positions in the pipeline, to the point that position this year is probably irrelevant. I’d take the best player available with size and/or edge and make that the theme of my entire draft. Plenty of that available at 9. And for the record, I would happy if the Sabres decide that is Smith. Quote
DarthEbriate Posted Thursday at 06:31 PM Report Posted Thursday at 06:31 PM 14 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Osburn is underrated. As long as Buffalo keeps their 2nd and 3rd, they'll have a bunch of lhd options. Quick prospect aside in the draft thread: Osburn has a good opportunity with a very young Badgers squad the next two seasons -- he's their only incoming freshman defenseman this year and his offensive skills should earn him PP time this season, when compared against the returning members of the D-corps. As to NHL talent, their other NHL D prospects are Phelan and Schulz who are definitely not offensive studs. Quote
LGR4GM Posted Thursday at 06:47 PM Author Report Posted Thursday at 06:47 PM 8 minutes ago, dudacek said: I think @DarthEbriate is correct to add Johnson and Novikkv to the mix and agree with you on Osburn. The TLDR version is the Sabres are well-balanced in all positions in the pipeline, to the point that position this year is probably irrelevant. I’d take the best player available with size and/or edge and make that the theme of my entire draft. Plenty of that available at 9. And for the record, I would happy if the Sabres decide that is Smith. Smith has sublime skating. He has decision making issues but he's got good size and plays physical. He works hard all over the ice and I don't think his offensive game has even scratched the surface. Outside of needing to refine his overall game, there's a ton to like in his package. At 6'4" 199lbs, there's a potential top pairing defender there. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted Thursday at 08:11 PM Report Posted Thursday at 08:11 PM 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: Smith has sublime skating. He has decision making issues but he's got good size and plays physical. He works hard all over the ice and I don't think his offensive game has even scratched the surface. Outside of needing to refine his overall game, there's a ton to like in his package. At 6'4" 199lbs, there's a potential top pairing defender there. And again, the Penn State connection raises the Bat Signal. And THIS GM seems to do what his owner wants unlike some in the past (Nylander fiasco, cough, cough, cough). Quote
shrader Posted Thursday at 10:55 PM Report Posted Thursday at 10:55 PM 2 hours ago, Taro T said: And again, the Penn State connection raises the Bat Signal. And THIS GM seems to do what his owner wants unlike some in the past (Nylander fiasco, cough, cough, cough). Have they actually drafted any Penn State player other than Brett Murray? Quote
Taro T Posted Thursday at 11:57 PM Report Posted Thursday at 11:57 PM 1 hour ago, shrader said: Have they actually drafted any Penn State player other than Brett Murray? Has any Penn State player actually been ranked this high? Quote
shrader Posted Friday at 12:04 AM Report Posted Friday at 12:04 AM 7 minutes ago, Taro T said: Has any Penn State player actually been ranked this high? To be fair, this is the first time they’ve been able to buy one. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted Friday at 09:01 AM Author Report Posted Friday at 09:01 AM This is Caleb Desnoyers who most consider an excellent 2way forward that will probably go in the 3-6 range: this is Carter Bear who almost no one even talks about as a top 10 pick... because ppl don't evaluate players like Bear correctly: Quote
Mr. Allen Posted Friday at 11:33 AM Report Posted Friday at 11:33 AM I’m starting to get a sense that we aren’t making the pick at 9. Quote
The Jokeman Posted Friday at 12:55 PM Report Posted Friday at 12:55 PM 3 hours ago, LGR4GM said: This is Caleb Desnoyers who most consider an excellent 2way forward that will probably go in the 3-6 range: this is Carter Bear who almost no one even talks about as a top 10 pick... because ppl don't evaluate players like Bear correctly: Bear gets buried because of the injury but I stated earlier he'd be on my short list of guys I'd take for the Sabres if we keep 9OA. Quote
LGR4GM Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM Reason #54 why I don't trust Pronman... He ranks the best skills and one of them is "compete level". Carter Bear doesn't appear on the list, at all. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6372836/2025/06/13/2025-nhl-draft-prospects-skills-tools-traits/ 1 Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago I might just take this day off. I’m genuinely excited to see what the Sabres do. KA better not screw this up. Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 7 minutes ago, SABRES 0311 said: I might just take this day off. I’m genuinely excited to see what the Sabres do. KA better not screw this up. It's exciting for sure, but before you dig into your PTO, remember we don't get to see them play until training camp. I'm excited too since this would have been my son's draft year and he's played with or against a lot of the Ontario and US kids (he wasn't quite big/good enough to play major junior). But with all the lead up, I'm expecting to feel a bit of the "now what?" feeling once it's all over. 2 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 15 hours ago Author Report Posted 15 hours ago 26 minutes ago, SABRES 0311 said: I might just take this day off. I’m genuinely excited to see what the Sabres do. KA better not screw this up. Take a half day at most. Nothing will happen until after noon. 1 Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 17 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Take a half day at most. Nothing will happen until after noon. I’m on PST and it’s an hour drive to work one way. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 16 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Reason #54 why I don't trust Pronman... He ranks the best skills and one of them is "compete level". Carter Bear doesn't appear on the list, at all. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6372836/2025/06/13/2025-nhl-draft-prospects-skills-tools-traits/ I found that funny as well. Isn't "compete" Carter Bear's best attribute? I haven't (and won't) do my usual deep dive into this draft, but Bear seems like the right choice for the Sabres at 9 unless something crazy happens early in the draft. Edited 14 hours ago by GASabresIUFAN Quote
steveoath Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago What’s the deal with the O’Brien kid? Few mocks have us taking him at 9. And heard him compared to Krebs (playmaker type player). Cant say that comparison gets me excited. Quote
Flashsabre Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, steveoath said: What’s the deal with the O’Brien kid? Few mocks have us taking him at 9. And heard him compared to Krebs (playmaker type player). Cant say that comparison gets me excited. He’s a tall lanky RHC with tremendous hockey sense, playmaking ability. Great skill but he doesn’t compete like a Martin or Bear. Has potential to be a top 6 centre. https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=271144 Edited 14 hours ago by Flashsabre 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 52 minutes ago, steveoath said: What’s the deal with the O’Brien kid? Few mocks have us taking him at 9. And heard him compared to Krebs (playmaker type player). Cant say that comparison gets me excited. A lot of pp assists and he's not physical. He also played with a guy who got 71g and sure, his setup helps but Lardis has a great shot. O'Brien needs to work on rounding out his defensive game. Idk, I just don't love the profile and think his assent is because of his last couple months. If he was nastier, I'd be interested but he's a 6'2" center with great passing and hands who isn't particularly adept at checking. If you want one of most creative puck distribution machines in the draft, he's your guy. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.